Notes on

1 John

2024 Edition

Dr. Thomas L. Constable



This epistle, like Hebrews, does not contain the name of its writer, but from its very early history the church believed that the Apostle John wrote it. Several ancient writers referred to this book as John's writing.[1] Though modern critics have challenged this view, they have not destroyed it.[2]

Original recipients

Neither is there any reference to who the first recipients of this epistle were, or where they lived, other than that they were Christians (2:12-14, 21; 5:13). They may have been the leaders of churches (2:20, 27). According to early church tradition, John ministered in Ephesus, the capital of the Roman province of Asia, for many years after he left Judea. We know from Revelation 2 and 3 that he knew the churches and the Christians in that Roman province well. Perhaps his readers lived in that province.[3] This was probably a letter designed to circulate among several congregations in contrast to having been intended for only one.[4] By way of contrast, John's second and third epistles contain the name of the writer, the recipient, and greetings.

The false teachers and teachings to which John alluded in this letter suggest that he wrote about teachings that existed in Asia: Judaism, Gnosticism, Docetism, the teachings of Cerinthus (a prominent Gnostic), and others.[5] Explanations of these will follow in the exposition. These philosophies extended beyond Asia, but they were present there during John's lifetime.

"The heresy which occasioned 1 and 2 John cannot be parallel with any other manifestation of heresy known from that era. Yet it has affinities with more than one such movement."[6]

"The writer of 1 John was thus addressing a community, made up of a number of house-churches in and around Ephesus … which was split in three ways. It consisted of the following: (a) Johannine Christians who were committed to the apostolic gospel of Jesus as they had received it; (b) heretically inclined members from a Jewish background; (c) heterodox followers from a Hellenistic (and/or pagan) background. The problems relating to the two 'heretical' groups, (b) and (c), were primarily theological and (by extension) ethical; although related difficulties concerning eschatology [future things] and pneumatology [the Holy Spirit] may have been present also (see on 2:18 and 4:1 …). To complete the picture, it should be noted that the life of the Johannine community was marked by the presence of a fourth group of people: the secessionists. Whereas the members of the first three groups could be found within John's circle, the anti-Christian secessionists had begun to break away from it. These were heretically inclined adherents of the Johannine community. In some cases they may have been genuine, if uninformed, believers. But in other instances they perhaps never properly belonged to John's church (although they thought they did), because they never really belonged to God (see on 1 John 2:18-19; cf. also 2:22-23)."[7]


This is one of the most difficult of all the New Testament books to date. One of the few references in the book that may help us date it is 2:19. If John meant that the false teachers had departed from among the apostles, a date in the 60s seems possible. This could place it about A.D. 60-65, before the Jewish revolts of A.D. 66-70 resulted in the scattering of the Jews from Judea. In this case John may have written from Jerusalem.[8] However many conservative scholars believe that John wrote this epistle much later, between about A.D. 85 and 97, when he evidently wrote the Gospel of John (ca. A.D. 85-95) and the Book of Revelation (ca. A.D. 95-96).[9] I prefer a date in the 90s, following the writing of John's Gospel, which 1 John seems to assume knowledge of.[10]

"Indeed the Epistle throughout has the Gospel as its background and is hardly intelligible without it."[11]

In view of the nature and the conclusion of the Book of Revelation, which seems to be God's final revelatory word to humankind, I think John probably composed his epistles before he wrote that book. So a date for 1 John in the early 90s, A.D. 90-95, seems most probable to me.[12]

Place of writing

Since John ministered in and around Ephesus later in his life, Ephesus seems to be the most probable place from which he wrote this epistle.[13]


"The Epistle is not a polemic [attack] primarily, but a letter for the edification of the readers in the truth and the life in Christ. And yet the errors of the Gnostics are constantly before John's mind."[14]

"John is contemplative rather than argumentative. He presents truths as they come by intuitive perception rather than by reasoned conclusion. He is mystical rather than logical. He sees the confirmation of truth in one's experience of it rather than in demonstration by argument."[15]

"John's pen is a surgeon's knife, not a philosopher's quill."[16]

"St. John has no liking for progress along an unending straight road; he loves a circling flight, like his symbol, the eagle."[17]

"… we should read 1 John, not trying to discern the flow of the argument as we would in a Pauline letter, but rather recognizing that it is, in its structure and rhetorical form [a form that is intended to persuade or impress], a piece of epideictic rhetoric [namely, characterized by a display of speaking or writing skill]."[18]


John's style of writing makes it difficult to outline this book. He flows from one subject to another so smoothly that it is often difficult to see clear breaks in his thought. In contrast, Paul typically identified changes in his subject matter clearly. Consequently, in the outline below some divisions occur at unusual places in the text: not necessarily chapter divisions or even verse divisions. The following outline reflects the structure of a typical deliberative oration that was common in John's world.[19]

I.       Introduction: the purpose of the epistle 1:1-4

II.       Living in the light of fellowship with God 1:5—2:11

A.      Staying on the path by walking in God's light 1:5—2:2

B.      Reaching the goal by knowing the God of light 2:3-11

III.      Resisting enemies 2:12-27

A.      Appreciating spiritual advances 2:12-14

B.      Recognizing spiritual adversaries 2:15-27

1.      Overcoming the world 2:15-17

2.      Resisting the antichrists 2:18-27

IV.     Living in anticipation of Christ's judgment seat 2:28—4:19

A.      Abiding to face Christ confidently 2:28

B.      Learning to recognize God's children 2:29—3:10a

C.      Learning to recognize Christian love 3:10b-23

1.      What love is not 3:10b-15

2.      What love is 3:16-18

3.      What love does for believers 3:19-23

D.      Learning to recognize the God of love 3:24—4:16

1.      God's indwelling affirmed 3:24

2.      God's Spirit recognized 4:1-6

3.      God's indwelling recognized 4:7-16

E.      Having boldness at Christ's judgment seat 4:17-19

V.      Learning how to live obediently 4:20—5:17

A.      The meaning of brotherly love 4:20—5:3a

B.      The empowerment of brotherly love 5:3b-15

C.      The consequences of brotherly love 5:16-17

VI.     Christian certainties 5:18-21


Ron Bigalke saw the structure of 1 John as being chiastic:[20]

"A     Prologue: Eternal Life (1:1-4)

B       Three Witnesses (1:5—2:2) (to deny sin is to make God a liar) (walk)

C       The love of God and the believer (2:3-17)

D       False christs (2:18-27)

E       Believer's confidence (2:28—3:10) (do not sin)

F       Love proves abiding (3:11-18)

E'      Believer's confidence (3:19-24) (do keep God's commands)

D'      False prophets (4:1-6)

C'      The love of God and the believer (4:7-21)

B'      Three Witnesses (5:1-12) (to deny Jesus is to make God a liar) (testimony)

A'      Epilogue: Eternal life (5:13-21)"[21]


If I were to boil down the message of this epistle into one sentence it would be this: Fellowship with God is the essence of eternal life. Paul wrote in Philippians 3:7 through 14 that his relationship with God was the most important thing in his life—by far. John wrote this epistle in order to enable believers to appreciate their fellowship with God, and he wrote to deepen that fellowship.

"It would not be inappropriate to write over this epistle as a whole, THE GATEWAY TO FELLOWSHIP WITH GOD."[22]

Both the Gospel of John and the First Epistle of John deal with the subject of eternal life.[23] John wrote his Gospel so that his readers might "believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in His name" (John 20:31).[24] John wrote this epistle to Christians so that they could have fellowship with the apostles, with God the Father, and with Jesus Christ (1 John 1:3). He wrote it so that we might experience the fullness of the eternal life that we possess (cf. John 10:10). However, the subject of this epistle is not eternal life but fellowship with God. Fellowship with God is the essence of eternal life (cf. John 17:3).

This epistle grew out of Jesus' Upper Room Discourse (John 14—17). Similarly, James' epistle grew out of Jesus' Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5—7), Peter's first epistle grew out of Jesus' Discipleship Discourse (Matt. 10), and the Book of Revelation grew out of the Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24—25). In the Upper Room Discourse Jesus explained what the apostles' relationship to God would be after He sent the Holy Spirit to indwell them (John 14:16-17). John expounded that revelation in this letter.

There are several terms in this epistle that John used as synonyms: fellowship with God, knowing God, abiding in God, and seeing God. These terms all describe the experience of Christians, and they all describe our relationship with God in varying degrees of intimacy.

Our relationships with people vary. Some are more intimate, and some are less intimate. Fellowship with God is also a matter of greater or lesser intimacy. When we speak of being in fellowship or out of fellowship, we are oversimplifying our relationship to God. For example, a child's fellowship with his or her parents is rarely either perfect or non-existent. It is usually somewhere between these extremes, and it may vary from day to day.

John's purpose in writing was to motivate his readers to cultivate greater intimacy with God. The greater the intimacy, the greater our fellowship, the better we know God experientially, and the closer we abide in Him (cf. John 14:21-24). The greater our intimacy with God, the more we will experience the life that is eternal. All Christians possess eternal life, but not all Christians experience that life as God intended us to enjoy it (John 10:10). Similarly, all living human beings have life, but not all live an abundant life.

This letter reveals two things about the life of fellowship: First, it reveals the resources of this life. There are two resources:

The first resource is objective. God has provided a pattern for the life of fellowship, and that pattern is Jesus Christ. In Christ we have personified two qualities that are characteristics of God that should also characterize us as the children of God:

The first of these qualities is light. Jesus Christ constantly walked in the light of God's holiness (1:5-6; 2:6). He never hid from God. He also conformed to the light of God's will perfectly. He was submissive, sinless, pure, and consecrated. The second of these qualities is love. Jesus also constantly manifested the love of God (cf. 4:10). In His attitudes and activities Jesus always demonstrated perfect love. His words and His deeds were a revelation of God's love. Jesus put others before Himself. He was selfless as well as holy.

The second resource of the life of fellowship is, according to this epistle, subjective. God has not only provided a pattern for the life of fellowship, He has also provided the power for it. Jesus Christ is not only an external example for us to imitate. But, even more helpfully, He is an internal power whom God has placed within us, who is at work in our lives. With eternal life we get Jesus (5:11-12). And with Him come two things:

First, we get light. We see spiritual things that we never saw before (2:20). We see how we ought to walk (2:27). We become sensitive to sin. Second, we get love. We see the need of other people who are groping in darkness, and we desire to reach out to them in service, and to bring them into the light (4:7). As soon as we share God's life, we begin to love with God's love. We can quench love, but every person who has eternal life has love within him or her.

To review, this letter reveals two things about the life of fellowship: first the resources of this life, which are an external pattern and internal power. Both of these come from Jesus Christ.

This letter also reveals the results of a life of intimate fellowship with God. These are two also:

First, there is value for the Christian. This value is that we realize life as God intended people to live it. We can experience life as God meant it to be when He first made people. We achieve our potential as human beings to the degree to which we walk in fellowship with God (i.e., abide in Him). Our intimacy with God perfects our personalities.

Second, there is also value for God. God enjoys fellowship with people. God's purpose in creation and redemption was to have fellowship with people. God finds in every person who walks with Him in intimate fellowship a person through whom He can manifest Himself, an instrument through whom He can accomplish His purposes. The abiding believer reveals God to those around him or her. God does not have to work on abiding believers with chastening, but He can work through them in blessing others and themselves.

John also called on his readers to fulfill their responsibilities in the life of fellowship. Regarding the light, we have two responsibilities:

First, we must obey the light (1:7). That means responding positively to the knowledge of God's will that we gain. We can become calloused to the truth. This is a special danger when one spends a lot of time dealing with spiritual matters. Believers need to cultivate their relationship with God daily. We all need to keep weeding the gardens of our spiritual lives.

Second, we must seek the light (1:9). We need to forsake the darkness of sin and keep walking in the light. The circle of God's light may move. We may gain new understanding of His will. When that happens, we need to move into that light in obedience (cf. Ps. 119:105).

Regarding love, we also have two responsibilities:

First, we must yield to its impulse. We can destroy our capacity to love by not expressing love when God moves us to do so. We can lose our passion for the lost by resisting the Holy Spirit's promptings to reach out in love. We need to be ready to sacrifice rather than to put ourselves first. However, if we yield to the impulse of love, to serve others, our love will deepen and intensify. We must not quench the Spirit if He is prompting us to reach out to someone with love.

Second, we must also guard love's purity. We need to watch out for false charity. True love never sacrifices principle. God never loved at the expense of light. Love never justifies sin.

In conclusion, I would like to suggest two applications of the message of this epistle, one to the individual and one to the church.

First, let me make one application to us as individual Christians. We can easily test whether we are living in close fellowship with God. Check the light and the love that is in your life. Is the light of holiness shining clearly, or are you walking in darkness? Is your love still burning brightly, or has your life deteriorated to the level of only learning God's Word? Learning is only one means to the end of living—living in intimate fellowship with God. What do you want people to remember you for, your knowledge or your love? In view of 1 Corinthians 13, I want to be remembered for my love more than for my knowledge.

Second, let me make one application to us Christians as the church of Jesus Christ. We need to keep our priorities in line with God's. Intimacy is His goal for us. God prefers a few committed disciples to a multitude of compromising disciples (cf. Jesus' 12 disciples). A pure church is more important to Him than a large church. Pastors should not draw back from urging people to walk in the light, and to walk in love, just to increase the size of their congregations. They need to make as broad an appeal as possible without pulling their punches in ministry. I am referring here to the church's ministry of equipping the saints. In presenting the gospel, we should make as broad an appeal as possible.[25]


I.      Introduction: THE PURPOSE OF THE EPISTLE 1:1-4

"This writing begins without any of the formal features characteristic of a letter, such as we found in 2 John and 3 John. Since the conclusion also lacks any typical features of a letter, we must conclude that the writing is not so much a letter as a written sermon or address."[26]

John began what he had to say by explaining to his audience why he wrote. He said that he wrote so that his readers would enjoy the fellowship with God that before this was possible only to those who had seen Him in person. This fellowship, he explained, rests on the reality of Jesus Christ's incarnation, and it results in full joy for those who experience it.

"No writer in the New Testament holds with greater intensity the full reality of the incarnation."[27]

1:1             "The beginning" (Gr. arche) may refer to the beginning of all things (2:13-14; John 1:1), or the beginning of the creation (3:8; Gen. 1:1), or to Jesus' incarnation (v. 2; cf. John 1:14). It could also refer to the beginning of Jesus' earthly ministry (Acts 1:22-24), the beginning of the Christian gospel (Mark 1:1-4), or the beginning of the readers' experience as Christians (2:7, 24; 3:11). The beginning of Jesus' earthly ministry, specifically the beginning of His teaching ministry, seems most consistent with what John proceeded to say about that beginning (cf. vv. 1b, 3a).

"… he [John] proclaims a message that has been embodied in a person—the person of Jesus Christ."[28]

"The phrase 'from the beginning,' frequently used in 1 John [2:7, 13, 14, 24 (twice); 3:8, 11; cf. 2 John 5, 6], refers for the most part to the doctrine proclaimed at the beginning (2:7, 24; 3:11) and is intended to move the readers to remain faithful to that doctrine as against the teachers of heresy who appeared only later."[29]

"The source of spiritual life to men is that which was, in the first instance, the source of natural life to all creatures. Here lies the foundation-stone of the Johannine theology. It assumes the solidarity of being, the unity of the seen and unseen. It rules out from the beginning all dualistic and Doketic conceptions of the world."[30]

John was probably referring to all that the apostles had experienced with Jesus from the time that they first became His disciples. John's verbs ("have heard," "have seen," "have looked at," and "touched") indicate a progressively closer approach to the object of investigation. The essence of fellowship is increasing intimacy. Our fellowship with God must involve drawing closer to Him and viewing Him more intently all the time in order for it to be genuine fellowship. The same is true of our fellowship with other human beings.

"To look, saves; to gaze, sanctifies."[31]

John used three of his basic senses (hearing, eyesight, and feeling) to highlight the reality of the object so that his readers would know that he was not speaking metaphorically. He cited personal experience and appealed to verifiable evidence to support the humanity of Jesus Christ (cf. Luke 24:39). Some false teachers denied His humanity.[32]

"Extreme Docetism [i.e., Docetic Gnostics] held that Jesus was not human at all but was merely a prolonged theophany, while moderate Docetism [i.e., Cerinthian Gnostics] considered Jesus the natural son of Joseph and Mary, upon whom Christ came at the time of baptism."[33]

Specific instances of personal encounter with Jesus Christ (cf. Luke 24:39) had left a continuing impression on John, as is clear from the perfect verb tenses in the Greek text.

John may have used "we" editorially to represent himself personally, or "we" may include all Christians. It is more likely, however, that "we" represents John and the other eyewitnesses of Jesus Christ, namely, Jesus' chosen apostles.[34] In this epistle John was speaking for others besides himself, and he was seeking to persuade still other believers of something not all of them had experienced or acknowledged (cf. Luke 1:2).[35]

"The Word of Life" probably refers to the message about Jesus Christ, namely, the gospel.[36] John referred to Jesus as "the Word" in his Gospel (John 1:1, 14), and he described Jesus claiming to be "the life" (John 14:6). The phrase "Word of Life" seems more likely to describe the message about the Person who is and who personifies life (cf. v. 2; Phil. 2:16; Acts 5:20). John probably spoke of Christ as "what," rather than "He" because here he wanted to emphasize the content of the message about Christ rather than the person of Christ.

1:2             "Life" is a title of Jesus Christ here, like "Word" is in John's Gospel (John 1:1, 14). "Life" (Gr. zoe) reflects the Christian experiences about which John wrote here, whereas the "Word" (Gr. logos) reflects the facts that Jesus declared and that John recorded in the fourth Gospel. Grace and truth explain the Word in John's Gospel (John 1:14), but light and love clarify the Life in his epistles.

In verse 1 the progression in the series of verbs ("heard," "seen," "looked at," and "touched") reflects increasingly intent attention to Jesus as the essence of fellowship. The progression in the verbs in verse 2 ("revealed," "seen," "testify," and "proclaim") shows the result of contemplating Jesus Christ and enjoying His fellowship, namely, bearing witness. One first sees the manifested Christ. Then, having seen, he or she is able to bear witness. Finally, one feels impelled by what he or she has seen to announce to others the message of life.

There is a strong stress on the eternality of "the life" (Jesus Christ) in this verse. The emphases on the quality of "the life" (eternal), and its equality with the Father, make this point (cf. John 1:2). The Incarnation is in view.

"Eternal life" is such a dominant theme in this epistle that one writer even entitled his commentary on 1 John: The Epistle of Eternal Life.[37] In John's writings, "eternal life" is also synonymous with salvation.[38]

1:3             "You," the recipients of this epistle, must have been genuine believers in view of how John referred to them (cf. 2:12-14, 21, 27; 5:13). They had not known Jesus Christ in the flesh as the apostles had. John wrote to them so they could enter into, and continue to enjoy, the intimate "fellowship" with Christ that the apostolic eyewitnesses enjoyed (cf. Acts 10:40-41).[39]

"This verse introduces the purpose of the Epistle: 'that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.'"[40]

This book is about how to have a more intimate relationship with God.

"The main theme of the Epistle is fellowship with God."[41]

"As a basis for comparison it is important to recognize that 1 John can express its favorite ideas in various ways. Alongside of 'to have fellowship with God,' which sounds general enough and is only found in 1:3 and 6, one of the commonest phrases is 'to be in God' (2:5; 5:20) or 'to abide' (2:6, 24; 3:24; 4:13, 15, 16). … Another expression for fellowship with God found only in John is 'to have God (or the Son)' (1 John 2:23; 5:12; 2 John 9). Finally, 'to know God' comes to the same thing. It occurs in the perfect tense in 2:3 (cf. 2:5); 2:13, 14 (cf. 1:3) with the same meaning."[42]

"Here we are given, without any hesitation, a description, the summum bonum [greatest good], of the Christian life; here, indeed, is the whole object, the ultimate, the goal of all Christian experience and all Christian endeavour. This, beyond any question, is the central message of the Christian gospel and of the Christian faith."[43]

Fellowship requires and rests on information, a common body of knowledge, and mutual acceptance of that data. John wrote to share this information with his readers.

"Thus two fundamental truths, which the philosophical heresies of the age were apt to obscure or deny, are here clearly laid down at the outset: (1) the distinctness of personality and equality of dignity between the Father and the Son; (2) the identity of the eternal Son of God with the historical person Jesus Christ."[44]

"It is an interpretive mistake of considerable moment to treat the term 'fellowship' as though it meant little more than 'to be a Christian.'"[45]

False teachers were preaching information about Jesus Christ that was not true. John also wrote to combat their deception (2:26).

"… the epistle … is written to a believing community that is dealing with fallout from the departure (2:19) of persons with beliefs and practices the author cannot endorse."[46]

"Only when we think aright of Jesus Christ, are we in unison with God. Only when we think aright of Him and are rightly disposed toward Him, can we have fellowship with each other; only on this condition can we work together with God for the world's redemption …"[47]

1:4             Here "we" is probably editorial. "These things" refers to what John wrote in this epistle. Not only would his readers experience full ("complete") "joy," but so would John, as the readers entered into and continued in intimate fellowship with God (cf. 3 John 4). Joy is the product of fellowship with God. When there is no joy, there is no fellowship (cf. John 15:11; 16:24).

In summary, John wrote as an apostolic eyewitness of Jesus Christ and His earthly ministry. He identified two dangers to readers that are still prevalent in the church today: One is the assumption that Christian fellowship is possible without common belief in Christ. The other is the assumption that someone can have a relationship with God without a relationship with Jesus Christ.[48] John wrote this epistle so his readers might join and continue in the fellowship with God that is possible only for those who have seen God, as the apostolic eyewitnesses of the incarnate Christ had done.

"He has the heart of a pastor which cannot be completely happy so long as some of those for whom he feels responsible are not experiencing the full blessings of the gospel."[49]

These verses, rather than 5:13, constitute the comprehensive purpose statement of the epistle. There are five purpose statements in 1 John (1:3, 4; 2:1, 26; 5:13) plus 10 imperatives (2:15, 24, 27, 28; 3:1, 7, 13; 4:1 [2 times]; 5:21), any of which could possibly provide John's purpose for writing. But 1:3 and 4 give his most comprehensive primary (fellowship) and secondary (joy) purposes in writing.[50]

"It is usually true that in the introduction to a book we find the key to that book. In the first four verses of this Epistle we find the key."[51]

II.     Living in the light of fellowship with God 1:5—2:11

"Since the apostle's expressed concern is that his readers might have fellowship with the apostolic circle and thus also with the Father and the Son (1:3), it is reasonable to specify what this fellowship is really like. So, as an introductory section to his epistle, John discusses the nature of true fellowship with God"[52]

A.     Staying on the Path by Walking in God's Light 1:5—2:2

John began his explanation of what it means to walk (live) in the light of God's fellowship by stressing the importance of continuing to obey God. Some antinomian Gnostics believed that knowledge was superior to virtue and morality, and John's revelation here countered that error.[53]

"The sum and substance of true religion is fellowship with God. Hence any number of men claim to have such fellowship, in particular the heretics who deny that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that his blood alone places us into and maintains us in fellowship with God."[54]

"If the readers are to have fellowship with the Father and with the Son (v. 3), they must understand what makes this possible. They must know who God is in himself and, consequently, who they are in themselves as creatures of God. So the author first describes the moral character of God in terms of light (v. 5) and then goes on to deny three claims made by those who falsely boast of their knowledge and fellowship with God. The false positions are (1) moral behavior is a matter of indifference in one's relationship to God (v. 6); (2) immoral conduct does not issue in sin for one who knows God (v. 8); and (3) the knowledge of God removes sin as even a possibility in the life of the believer (v. 10). True 'tests' or evidence of fellowship with God or walking in the light are (1) fellowship with one another (v. 7), with subsequent cleansing by the blood of Christ; (2) confession of sin, (v. 9) which brings both forgiveness and cleansing; and (3) trusting that if we sin we have Jesus Christ as an advocate and sacrifice for our sins (2:2)."[55]

J. Sidlow Baxter noted seven contrasts in this epistle, and he believed a key clause is: "Hereby we know":[56]

·      The light versus darkness (1:5—2:11)

·      The Father versus the world (2:12-17)

·      Christ versus the Antichrist (2:18-28)

·      Good works versus evil works (2:29—3:24)

·      The Holy Spirit versus error (4:1-6)

·      Love versus pious pretense (4:7-21)

·      The God-born versus others (5:1-21)

1:5             This verse provides a basis for what follows in verses 6 through 10 and, in a sense, for the whole rest of the letter. Schnachenburg saw it as the message of 1:6 through 2:17.[57] Yarbrough regarded this verse as the main burden of the epistle.[58] It gives the standard against which the three following professions fall short.

"Nothing has ever given such relief to the human mind as the announcement of the simple truth of this verse."[59]

"The message" in view in this verse is the truth that Jesus Christ revealed to the apostolic eyewitnesses.

The figure of "light" that John used to describe God emphasizes both His ability to reveal and His ability to deal with what the light of His holiness reveals (cf. John 1:4-5, 7-9; 3:19-21; 8:12; 9:5; 12:35-36, 46; Rev. 21:23). John elsewhere described God as "spirit" (John 4:24) and as "love" (1 John 4:8). All three comparisons of God stress His immateriality and essence. God exposes and condemns sin (called "darkness" in John 1:5; 3:19; 12:35 [twice], and in 1 John 1:5-6; 2:8-9, 11 [twice]). The "light" figure emphasizes these qualities in God: His splendor and glory, His truthfulness, His purity, His self-communicative nature (cf. Ps. 27:1; 36:9; Isa. 49:6; John 1:9), His empowering activity (cf. John 8:12; 12:35; Eph. 5:8-14), and His right to demand (cf. John 3:19-21).

"A God that is not infinitely above finite comprehension is not God. To reduce God to the range of finite thought is to produce a mental idol."[60]

The light/darkness motif was common in both the Hellenistic and Jewish thought life of John's day and culture.[61] For John these concepts were mainly ethical (cf. Eph. 5:8-14).

"Whatever other qualities this metaphorical designation [i.e. "light"] may include, it clearly involves the intellectual and moral—enlightenment and holiness. Just as light reveals and purifies, so by His very nature God illuminates and purifies those who come to Him. His nature determines the conditions for fellowship with Him."[62]

"As darkness has no place in God, so all that is of the darkness is excluded from having fellowship with God."[63]

"As all material life and growth depends on light, so all spiritual life and growth depends on GOD."[64]

John frequently clarified and emphasized his statements by restating them in terms of what they are not, as he did here.

1:6             John may have used the "If we claim" phrase in verses 6, 8, and 10 in order to voice the teaching of false teachers.

"It is probable that these claims were real statements made by people in the church to which John was writing, and that they reflect the outlook of the people who were causing trouble in the church."[65]

The Nicolaitans, a group of antinomians, made such claims.[66] In our day any person who claims that it is not important to do the will of God, as expressed in Scripture, makes this claim.

"John is concerned to alert his readers to approaches to human wrong and wrongdoing that are—or are not—commensurate with God's brilliant character as revealed in his Son."[67]

John's claim here is that the Christian who professes to have fellowship with Him who is light (holiness), but disobeys Him (walks "in the darkness"), is lying. A practicing sinner cannot have close fellowship with a holy God, though he can have a relationship with God (i.e., be a true Christian). God revealed this truth throughout Scripture. We do not need to reestablish our relationship with God every time we sin, though we do need to reestablish our fellowship with Him. Faith in Christ results in our becoming the children of God and obtaining eternal life. Action, specifically obedience, was a very important part of true knowledge for John, and it must be for us as well (cf. James).

The Greek word translated "fellowship" (koinonia) here means sharing things in common by two or more parties. It does not mean sharing salvation, which is individually experienced.

Some commentators take the phrases "have fellowship with Him" and "walk in the Light" as describing salvation.[68] Advocates of this view say that if a Christian does not persevere in the faith, he or she is not a Christian. This interpretation may result in backloading the gospel with works.

One writer held that walking in the light describes the criteria for access to the Father. The criterion for validation that one is walking in the light, according to this view, is not good works but believing the revelation of imputed righteousness and forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ, which John defines as the light (revelation). Thus, one walks in the light if he or she believes in Jesus Christ. If one walks in darkness, he or she does not believe in Jesus Christ and thus has no access to the Father.[69] I do not support this view.

John earlier said that his aim was that his readers, who were Christians (2:12-14, 21, 27), should enjoy fellowship with the apostolic eyewitnesses that they did not then share (v. 3).

"… all true 'fellowship' is predicated on apostolic doctrine."[70]

1:7             Walking "in the light" means walking in the sphere that the light of God's will prescribes. Here "light" does not mean God Himself, as in verse 5, but the sphere in which God lives and operates. The idea is more where we walk than how we walk. Had John said according to the light, rather than in the light, he would have been requiring sinless perfection for fellowship with God. We must be open and responsive to the light that we have, which increases as we grow in our knowledge of God's will.

"How do we do this? If I enter a lighted room and walk around in it, I am walking in the light; I am moving in a sphere which the light illuminates as it shines not only on me but upon everything around me. If I were to personalize the light, I could also say that I was walking in the presence of the light. Since according to this passage God not only is light (verse 5), but He is also in the light, to walk in the light must mean essentially to live in God's presence, exposed to what He has revealed about Himself. This, of course, is done through openness in prayer and through openness to the Word of God in which He is revealed. By contrast, to 'walk in darkness' (verse 6) is to hide from God and to refuse to acknowledge what we know about Him."[71]

"It [walking in the light] is … to be responsive to the light which God sheds into the heart. It is an attitude of willingness to confess immediately every sin as soon as it is recognized to be sin. Such confession brings the Christian at once into moral agreement with God."[72]

"One another" evidently refers to God and us, rather than our fellow believers and us, in view of the context. We share the light in which God dwells. Another view is that John meant that we cannot enjoy fellowship with God if we neglect fellowship with other Christians.[73]

Two things are equally true of believers who walk in the light, according to this verse: we enjoy fellowship with God and others, and we are experiencing cleansing from "all sin."

"This ["all sin"] refers to man's sinful nature in general, although it may include the wrong acts which can occur even when a Christian is living 'in the light.'"[74]

"The thought is not of the forgiveness of sin only, but of the removal of sin. The sin is done away; and the purifying action is exerted continuously."[75]

God "cleanses" us at conversion in the sense that He will never bring us into condemnation for our sins (cf. Rom. 8:1; 1 Cor. 6:11; Eph. 1:7). However, we need continual cleansing from the defilement that sinful daily living brings, because it hinders our fellowship with God (cf. John 13:10). "The blood of Jesus" is a metonymy for the death of Jesus.[76] It is the power of Jesus' blood-sacrifice, the pouring out of His blood in His death, that cleanses us (cf. Heb. 9:22). It is not Jesus' physical blood that cleanses us by some magical and literal cleansing process.

Some Christians believe that Jesus' physical blood is literally what cleanses people when they sin, but this is not supported in Scripture. Some believe that His literal blood was transported to and has been kept in heaven, and is supernaturally applied to believers from there. This is a conclusion that is based on a literal interpretation and inference made from Heb. 9:24 and 25, which passage they believe means that Jesus entered into heaven with His own literal physical blood. Spiritually, on the other hand, we believe that Christ's historical physical blood-sacrifice continues to cleanse believers from the defilement of sin, and this cleansing process is absolutely necessary for the believer's continued fellowship with God.

In Old Testament Israel believers had to offer sacrifices repeatedly in order to keep themselves spiritually clean before God. But Jesus Christ's perfect sacrifice has that lasting (unbroken, uninterrupted) effect for the believer who walks in the light.

"What John has in mind here is the cleansing of the conscience from guilt and moral defilement which is so insisted on in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Heb. 9:14; 10:2, 22), and which takes a leading place among the saving benefits of the redemptive self-sacrifice of Christ."[77]

1:8             This second claim (cf. v. 6) is more serious than the first, and its results are worse: We do not just "lie," but "we are deceiving ourselves," "if we say that we have no sin." The claim in verse 6 seeks to bring God down to our level, whereas the claim in verse 8 seeks to bring man up to God's level.[78]

If a Christian claims to be enjoying fellowship with God, he may think that he is temporarily or permanently entirely sinless. Yet our sinfulness exceeds our consciousness of sinfulness. We have only a very limited appreciation of the extent to which we sin. We commit sins of thought as well as deed, sins of omission as well as commission, and sins that spring from our nature as well as from our actions. This verse warns against all forms of the heresy of perfectionism.[79]

Some have interpreted the phrase "has no sin" to mean "has no sin nature" or "has no sin principle."[80] However this seems out of harmony with John's other uses of the phrase to "have sin" (cf. John 15:22, 24; 19:11). It probably means to have no guilt for sin.[81]

God's truth, as Scripture reveals it, does not have a full hold on us—it is not controlling our thinking—if we make this claim. "In us" suggests not that we have the facts in our mental grasp, but that they have control over us. They are in us like alcohol is in the stomach, rather than like a penny is in a pocket. The facts influence how we behave. The same contrast exists between saving faith and intellectual assent.

1:9             This verse is the converse of verse 8. Acknowledging the sins of which we are aware is opposite to saying that we are not guilty for sinning. The Greek word translated "confess" (homologeo) literally means "to say the same" thing. Confessing, therefore, means saying about our sins what God says about them, namely, that they are indeed sins, offenses against Him, and not just mistakes, blunders, or errors. One scholar wrote that this is public confession.[82] But there does not seem to be good reason to read that into the text.

"'He who confesses and condemns his sins,' says Augustine, 'already acts with God. God condemns thy sins: if thou also dost condemn them, thou art linked on to God.'"[83]

"If we confess our sins" God will then "forgive" the sins that we confess and will, in addition, "cleanse us from all unrighteousness." Consequently we do not need to worry that He might have failed to forgive us for sins of which we are unaware. Sin incurs a debt to God, but forgiveness (Gr. aphiemi) cancels the debt and dismisses the charge. Sin also pollutes the sinner, but God's cleansing (katharizo) removes the stain so that we can be holy again. God absolutely promises forgiveness that is consistent with His justice (because Jesus Christ paid the penalty for all of our sins).

Some expositors teach that this verse cannot apply to Christians since God has already forgiven Christians (Rom. 8:1). Therefore we do not need to ask for what we already have.[84] This viewpoint fails to distinguish between judicial forgiveness, which we receive at conversion, and family forgiveness, which we need after conversion. For example, a judge could accept payment for his own son's fine in court and set him free from the legal demands of the law but still discipline him when he got home. Jesus instructed His believing disciples to ask the "Father," not the Judge, for forgiveness (Matt. 6:12; Luke 11:4).

The fact that God has removed the penalty for our sins at conversion (1 Cor. 6:11; Eph. 1:7; 4:32; Col. 2:13) does not remove the need to confess our sins frequently. Again, the issue is not acceptance by God, but fellowship with God. Conversion (judicial, forensic, positional) forgiveness makes us acceptable as members of God's family. Continual (parental, family, practical) forgiveness enables us to experience intimate fellowship as God's children within His family.

"Sin interrupts fellowship but cannot change relationship."[85]

"The status just described is analogous to God's full acceptance of Israel, as expressed in Balaam's inspired utterance: 'He has not observed iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen wickedness in Israel' (Numbers 23:21). Yet, on a practical level, Israel was full of failures!"[86]

Must confession include turning away from sin (repentance) in order to be true confession? Since true confession involves saying the same thing about our sin that God does, it must include repentance. God not only said that sin is wrong, but He also said that we should turn from it. If we only label a particular act of sin as sin, we are not really saying the same thing about it that God says. We must be willing to say that we will turn from it if we want to say about our sin what God says about it.

"Confession of sin to God and to one another (James 5:16) is urged throughout the N.T. from John the Baptist (Mark 1:5) on."[87]

"Keep short accounts with God. Do not wait until Sunday morning to confess a sin."[88]

Another view is that this verse explains how to distinguish a teacher of the truth from a false teacher. Thus this verse is not a promise as much as it is a test. According to this view true teachers confess their sins, but false teachers do not.[89] This interpretation arises out of the conviction that the main purposes of the epistle were to identify reliable teachers (2:26) and to confirm believers in their faith (5:13).

1:10           The false claim here is that the sin we have committed is not really sin. This is the third and most serious claim (cf. vv. 6, 8). It puts God's revelation of sin aside and makes people the authority for what is and what is not sin. This claim says that God is wrong in His judgment of people and is therefore a liar. The claimant dismisses His Word as invalid (e.g., Ps. 14:3; Isa. 53:6; John 2:24-25; Rom. 3:23).

Each of these three false claims, in verses 6, 8, and 10, is a denial of the truth that immediately precedes it, in verses 5, 7, and 9 respectively. The corrective to each of the first two false claims follows in the verse immediately after those claims.




False claim

God is light (v. 5).

We can have fellowship with Him even though we walk in darkness (v. 6).

Walking in the light is necessary for fellowship with God (v. 7).

We are not guilty when we sin (v. 8).

Confession is necessary to restore fellowship with God (v. 9).

We have not sinned (v. 10).


"It would be difficult to find any single passage of Scripture more crucial and fundamental to daily Christian living than 1 John 1:5-10. For here, in a few brief verses, the 'disciple whom Jesus loved' has laid down for us the basic principles which underlie a vital walk with God."[90]

"What then is the principle of fellowship with God? Succinctly stated, it is openness to God and full integrity in the light of His Word."[91]

"The Christian religion is the religion of sinners. The Christian life is a life of continued repentance, of continual faith in, thankfulness for, and love to the Redeemer."[92]

2:1             John's preceding comments on the inevitability of sinful behavior (vv. 6-10) could have led his readers to two conclusions: Either it is useless to strive against sin, since we can never in this life be done with it, or, if escape from sin is so easy, why dread falling into it?[93] John proceeded to assure his readers here that he did not want them to sin at all (cf. John 5:14). This was one of his purposes in writing this epistle, and it is the third of John's five purpose statements (cf. 1:3, 4). Avoidance of sin is important, even though it is not entirely possible. Similarly, we try to avoid bad weather, even though that is not completely possible.

"Thus far John's epistle has announced its purpose (1:1-4), affirmed God's character as light (1:5), and explored implications of God's character for life in the Christian community (1:6-10), focusing on appropriate and inappropriate responses of the mouth and heart. In the present section [2:1-8] John turns directly to his readers with the first of numerous poignant appeals growing out of the broad yet surprisingly deep foundation he has laid in such short compass."[94]

John used the Greek word translated "children" here (teknia) as a family term of endearment. It means little born ones (2:12, 28; 3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21; John 13:33; cf. Gal. 4:19). "My" adds a further note of tenderness. (Compare the "we" statements in chapter 1.) These terms ("my little children" and "I") do not require us to conclude that the recipients were necessarily John's personal converts, but they were very dear to him. Since this letter indicates that they were mature Christians, they may have been the leaders of various house-churches in Asia Minor.

"Let me remind you that 1 John is a family epistle; it emphasizes the relationship of the family of God."[95]

"May not sin" does not mean may never ever sin again. Sinning is inevitable for sinners, even forgiven sinners, but in every instance of temptation there is always the possibility that we will not fall (1 Cor. 10:13). "If" introduces a condition assumed to take place for the sake of the argument (a third class condition in Greek).

It is hard to strive for greater intimacy with God when our lives are moving along without major problems or sins. It is easy to be content with mediocrity in our relationship with God. Nevertheless, God wants us to be holy as He is holy, not just holy enough to muddle through life without making major blunders. Only He can give us the desire and the ability to pursue holiness as a goal in life (Phil. 2:13).

As our "Advocate" (friend in court, mediator, intercessor, or defense attorney), Jesus Christ "pleads the cause" of the sinning Christian before God the Father (cf. Rom. 8:34; Heb. 7:25; 9:24). This ministry appears to be broader than simply aiding the sinner after he or she sins. It evidently includes pleading the sinner's cause with the Father whenever that becomes necessary—like when Jesus prayed that Peter's faith would not fail (Luke 22:31-32). Here, however, the emphasis is on Jesus Christ's help after we have sinned. Since Jesus Christ is "righteous," He is the perfect Advocate with God (cf. Acts 3:14; 7:52).

The Greek word translated "Advocate" is parakleton, which transliterated into English is "Paraclete." It means one who gets called to the side of another to help. Jesus used this word four times in the Upper Room Discourse to describe the Holy Spirit (John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7).[96] He called the Holy Spirit "another Helper" like Himself (John 14:16). This is the only other place in the New Testament where this Greek word appears.

"Demosthenes uses it [the word parakleton] to designate the friends of the accused who voluntarily step in and personally urge the judge to decide in his favor. That is the sense of this word here because 'with the Father' as well as 1:9 refer to God as the Judge in the case. In John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7, where the Holy Spirit is the Paraclete, we have a different case, for the term is there used in the nonforensic, the wider sense of one who comes to our aid."[97]

"The Holy Spirit is our Comforter down here, and Christ is our Comforter up there."[98]

"Whereas in the first part of this v[erse] John is anticipating too lenient an attitude toward sin, in the second half he is countering the possibility of too harsh a view."[99]

"As a physician might say to his patient: 'Your trouble is obstinate; the poison is in your blood, and it will take a long time to eradicate it. But I do not tell you this to discourage you or make you careless; no, on the contrary, to make you watchful and diligent in the use of the remedy' …"[100]

2:2             Jesus Christ did not just make satisfaction for our sins, as a priest, though He did that. He is the satisfaction Himself, as a sacrifice (cf. Rom. 3:25). The Septuagint translators used the same Greek word translated "propitiation" here (hilasmos, satisfaction, cf. 4:10) to translate the mercy seat on the ark of the covenant. Jesus' body was the site where God placated His wrath against sin. Verses 1:5 through 2:2 all have Old Testament tabernacle connotations. Jesus' death not only expiated (cancelled, dismissed, waived) our sins, but it provided cleansing from their defilement and satisfied God's wrath against sin with an acceptable offering.[101]

This verse provides strong support for the fact that Jesus Christ died for all people (unlimited atonement). In His death the Lord Jesus provided salvation that is sufficient for all ("the whole world"), though it is efficient (or effective, efficacious) only for those who trust in Him (2 Cor. 5:14-15, 19; Heb. 2:9; Rev. 22:17). In other words, Christ's death made eternal life available for all but not automatic for all. "Our" refers to the sins of all believers, and the "whole world" means all humankind, not just the elect (cf. 4:14; John 1:12, 29; 3:16).[102] Those who hold to particular redemption (or limited atonement, i.e., that Jesus died only for the elect) limit the meaning of "the whole world" to the world of the elect.

"Johannine thought and terminology leave absolutely no room for any such concept as 'the world of the elect.'"[103]

R. T. Kendall has shown that John Calvin did not believe in limited atonement, though many of his followers have believed and still do believe in limited atonement. That theory was put forth by Theodore Beza, Calvin's successor in Geneva, and was popularized by William Perkins in British Reformed theology.[104]

John reminded his readers in this section of his epistle (1:8—2:2) that fellowship with God is possible only when we deal with sin in our lives. This is true of believers (1:5—2:1) as well as unbelievers (2:2). John articulated four fundamental principles that underlie fellowship with God in order to facilitate his readers' experience of that fellowship. One must renounce sin (1:8—2:2), obey God (2:3-11), reject worldliness (2:12-17), and keep the faith (2:18-29) to live in the light of God's presence.

B.     Reaching the Goal by Knowing the God of Light 2:3-11

"The author is explaining to the members of his church, in answer to developing heretical tendencies, the nature of true Christian belief and practice, and the way in which these interact. To do this he first chooses as his theme and for his exhortation the necessity of 'living in the light' (1:5-7). The first (negative) condition required for a genuinely Christlike existence, the writer suggests, is the renunciation of sin (1:8—2:2). The second (positive) condition he now proceeds to discuss: it is obedience, especially to the law of love (2:3-11)."[105]

"Though the immediate effect of the light is to expose sin, its primary purpose is to reveal duty."[106]

From his comments on fellowship with God, John moved to a discussion of knowing God. He did so to enable his readers to appreciate the fundamental importance of knowing God as well as having intimate fellowship with God. These concepts are virtually synonymous.[107] John said similar things about knowing God as he had said about having fellowship with God. Increased fellowship with God and increased knowledge of God are inseparable. Fellowship with God should always lead to more perfect knowledge of God. This should be its result.

"Fellowship" (Gr. koinonia) is the less common term, occurring only four times in 1 John: 1:3 (twice), 6, 7. "Know" is more common. Ginosko (to know experientially) appears 24 times: 2:3, 4, 5, 13 (twice), 14, 18, 29; 3:1 (twice), 6, 16, 19, 20, 24; 4:2, 6 (twice), 7, 8, 13, 16; 5:2, 20. Oida (intellectual knowledge) appears 15 times: 2:11, 20, 21 (twice), 29; 3:2, 5, 14, 15; 5:13, 15 (twice), 18, 19, 20. John did not use the noun ginosis (experiential knowledge) in this epistle.

"Again the false claims to knowledge by the opponents are stated first, this time introduced by the clause 'he who says' (cf. vv. 4, 6, 9). Each of these claims is again denied and the evidence or 'tests' of the true knowledge of God is set forth: obeying his commands (v. 5), walking in his likeness (v. 6), and loving one's brother (v. 10)."[108]

2:3             John proposed a test whereby we can measure our experiential knowledge of God (Father and Son, 1:3), that is, how well we really "know" Him. He said: Look at your response to God's revealed will. How well do you "keep His commandments"? To "keep" (Gr. tereo) His commandments means "to observe" or "to attend carefully" to them. The opposite is throwing them away (cf. v. 4; 3:22; 5:3). In other words, we are to obey them.

"A study was released by the University of Southern California indicating that one-third of the medical patients in this country ignore what doctors tell them to do. … The situation is not much different when it comes to the believer doing what God tells him [or her] to do."[109]

All believers know God to some extent (John 17:3). However some know Him more fully and intimately than others do (John 14:7-9, 21-23). Occasionally a person who has been married for a long time, and then gets a divorce, will say of his or her spouse: I never really knew her (or him). Obviously they knew each other in one sense, but their knowledge of one another was not very complete or intimate. John's point was that our personal experiential knowledge of God will affect the way we live, and the way we live, obediently or disobediently, will reveal how well we really know God.

"To know God was not merely to know Him as the philosopher knows Him; it was to know Him as a friend knows Him. In Hebrew the word to know is used of the relationship between husband and of [sic] wife, and especially of the sexual act, the most intimate of all relationships (cp. Genesis 4:1)."[110]

"This verse is often taken as a way of knowing whether or not we are really saved. But that view flies directly into the face of all Johannine theology, according to which we are saved by believing in Christ for eternal life (John 3:16; 5:24; 6:35 and passim; the references are numerous). … The idea that a Christian can believe in Christ, without knowing whether he or she has really believed, is complete nonsense. Of course we can know whether or not we believe. That we can know this is both common sense and completely biblical [cf. John 9:35-38; 11:25-27].[111]

"Thus the test suggested by 1 John 2:3 is not of the saving knowledge of God or of Christ, but of the experiential knowledge of God and His Son. To get this wrong, as many commentators have, is to lay the groundwork for a complete misreading of the epistle! Such a misreading is indeed common in the commentaries today and may be traced back primarily to Robert Law's study on this epistle."[112]

"The sign of [experiential] knowledge of God is obedience to his commands and recognition of the way of life that he expects from his people."[113]

"In other words, to 'know' God is not a matter of correct thought-processes, but of a genuine spiritual relationship. The knowledge of God, and fellowship with him, are complementary aspects of Christian experience."[114]

2:4             The profession in view in this verse ("I have come to know Him"), in the light of the context (1:6, 8, 10), is evidently another claim to having a close relationship with God, not a claim to being saved.[115]

"Relationship [to God] does not change. Fellowship [with God] does."[116]

If a person says he knows God intimately, but is not obedient to the revealed will of God, he "is a liar." He does not know God intimately and does not have a close relationship with God. Furthermore, God's truth does not have a controlling influence over his life (is not "in him," cf. 1:8, 10).

"We may not like John's verbal style [i.e., his hateful-sounding denunciation; e.g., 4:20], but he may simply be stating a fact in God's sight as a pastoral messenger to God's people who need a wakeup call."[117]

Jesus used similar language in Matthew 23:13 through 33 and John 8:55, and John was one of two "Sons of Thunder" (Mark 3:17).

"… who is not keeping God's commands does not know God experientially no matter what he claims verbally."[118]

"St. John never uses the word nomos ["law"] for the rule of Christian obedience: this word is reserved for the Mosaic law, John i. 17, 46, and in all fifteen times in the Gospel: but almost always entolai ["commandment"] …"[119]

Verses 4, 6, and 9 contain three more claims (cf. 1:6, 8, 10).





I have come to know Him (v. 4; cf. John 17:3).

He keeps His word (v. 5).

I abide in him (v. 6; cf. John 15:4).

He walks as He walked (v. 6).

I am in the light (v. 9; cf. John 12:46).

He loves his brother (v. 10).


"The three assertions about knowing God, abiding in him, and being in the light (as he himself is in the light, v 7), are parallel versions of a single claim to be in a right relationship with the Father through the Son."[120]

2:5a            On the other hand ("But"), the Christian who is careful to observe all of God's "word" (not just His commandments, v. 4), gives evidence that he has come to understand and appreciate God's love for him. God's love is "perfected" in him in the sense that the Christian has perceived it, has responded to it, and it is having its intended effect in his or her behavior. Our love for God is in view here ("the love of God") rather than His love for us (cf. v. 15; 4:12; 5:3).[121] Loving God is synonymous with knowing God (vv. 3-4). When a Christian moves beyond simply obeying God and desires to please Him, God's love in him or her has reached its desired effect: It has truly been perfected.

"… the perfect observation of His commandments is the perfection of love to Him."[122]

Bible students have often called John "the apostle of love" because of his frequent references to love. There are no fewer than 46 references to love in 1 John. The verb agapao ("to love") appears 28 times in these verses: 2:10, 15 (twice); 3:10, 11, 14 (twice), 18, 23; 4:7 (twice), 8, 10 (twice), 11 (twice), 12, 19 (twice), 20 (thrice), 21 (twice); 5:1 (twice), 2 (twice). The noun agape ("love") occurs 18 times: 2:5, 15; 3:1, 16, 17; 4:7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16 (thrice), 17, 18 (thrice); 5:3. Likewise many have referred to Paul as "the apostle of faith" and to Peter as "the apostle of hope," because of their major emphases.

"Love for Christ and obedience to His word are in no way a test of saving faith, despite the repeated claim of many that they are. Instead, they are tests of genuine, heartfelt discipleship to Jesus."[123]

2:5b-6        John's use of the phrase "in Him" is different from Paul's use of the phrase "in Christ." Paul used this phrase to describe every believer's relationship to Christ because of his or her justification. The unsaved are not "in Christ." However, John used "in Him" like Jesus did, in the Upper Room Discourse, to describe, not all believers, but the group of believers who abide in Christ (John 15:1-8). In John 15:8 Jesus said, "My Father is glorified by this, that you bear much fruit, and so prove to be my disciples." He did not say: and so prove to be believers. Jesus linked obeying His commandments with abiding in His love (John 15:10).

"Thus the test of 'abiding' in him is, as before, whether or not the claimant is living a life of obedience to God."[124]

The term or expression "remains in Christ" is a synonym for having an intimate relationship with Him, as are the terms "having fellowship with God" and "knowing God [experientially]." John's point was that a believer who is remaining in God ("in Him") will obey God, just as Jesus Christ ("He") remained in God and gave evidence of that by obeying His Father. John used the word translated "remains" (Gr. meno, abides) 24 times in 1 John (2:6, 10, 14, 17, 19, 24 [thrice], 27 [twice], 28; 3:6, 9, 14, 15, 17, 24 [twice]; 4:12, 13, 15, 16 [thrice]). This indicates a major emphasis on the believer's abiding relationship in this epistle.

Unfortunately the translators of the NASB (2020 ed.) rendered the Greek word meno "remain" rather than "abide." This implies that the Christian simply needs to remain as he is rather than that he needs to pursue and maintain a close relationship with God.

The obligation of every Christian is not just to obey God's orders (vv. 4-5) but also to "walk" (live) in the same manner as Jesus "walked," namely, to follow the obedient example of Jesus (v. 6).

"We cannot claim to abide in Him unless we behave like Him."[125]

"To walk as He walked is something we cannot accomplish in our own strength. It is supernatural. It is impossible for a man to imitate Christ [without divine enablement]."[126]

Rather, we must allow Christ to manifest His life through us as we obey God even as Jesus did.

"Johannine imitation means to follow as a disciple, a completely dedicated adherent and advocate."[127]

The next few verses explain what it means to behave like Jesus did.

2:7             What other possible commandments did John have in mind when he wrote in verses 3 and 4 "keep His commandments"? He explained in this verse that he referred to "no new commandment" with which his readers were unfamiliar. He referred to "the old commandment" that they had known about "from the beginning" of their experience as Christians (i.e., the command to love each other, vv. 9-11; cf. John 13:34-35).[128] The command to "love one another" appears at least a dozen times in the New Testament: John 13:34; 15:9, 12, 17; Romans 13:8; 1 Thessalonians 4:9; 1 Pet. 1:22; 1 John 3:11, 23; 4:7, 11-12; and 2 John 5.

"The life of Christ was one of self-sacrificing love; therefore, the proof of imitating him is exhibited in love. Love is that which seeks the highest good in the one loved; and since the highest good is the will of God, love is doing the will of God."[129]

2:8             In another sense, however, this "old commandment" was "new" (lit. fresh, Gr. kainos). John often wrote in terms of black or white contrasts in this epistle (either or), but in verses 7 and 8 he spoke of both and. With the Incarnation the light of God had entered the world more brightly than ever before (Heb. 1:1-3). The old commandment is new in that it belongs to the new era that Jesus had inaugurated (John 14:6).

"It is not a recent innovation, yet it is qualitatively new as experienced in Christ."[130]

The "new commandment" is "true" (Gr. alethes, revealed) in Christ and in Christians in this sense: Jesus Christ's obedience to His Father demonstrated it first, and Christians' obedience to God is demonstrating it now. Christian love is truth manifested, both in Jesus who modeled it, and in His disciples who follow His example.

This "true Light" (the gospel of Christ) was dispelling the darkness of sin, and it would continue to do so until the final increase of that light results in the complete annihilation of darkness. When Jesus Christ issued the Great Commandment anew, He called it a "new commandment," even though God had given it previously (Lev. 19:18). Now it was important in a new sense, due to Christ's coming as the Light of the World (John 13:34-35).

The NASB translators capitalized "Light" because they believed that John was referring to Jesus here. This is possible. The "true Light" (Jesus) had come into the world and was dispelling the darkness of sin. John's statement is true whether he meant the light of the gospel or the Light of the World.

2:9             This verse contains a concrete example of what John had been talking about. It is another claim to intimate fellowship with God that a person's behavior reveals as false (1:6, 8, 10; 2:4, 6). Hatred of other Christians is a sure sign that one is not walking with God in close fellowship.

Obviously genuine Christians have hated other Christians. It is naive to claim, as some expositors have, that the one who is hating must be an unbeliever. John regarded the hater and the one hated as brothers. In this letter the community of Christians is in view, so John meant a brother Christian, rather than an unsaved neighbor.[131]

"If the Bible taught that feelings of hatred were a sure sign of an unsaved condition, then virtually no one in the whole church would be saved! But the Bible does not teach this."[132]

It is likely that John was speaking of hatred in a comparative sense, as Jesus sometimes did (Matt. 6:24; 24:10; Luke 14:26; 16:13; cf. Deut. 21:15-17; 2 Sam. 19:7; Prov. 13:24; Mal. 1:2-3; Rom. 9:12). Hyperbolically, to fail to show love is to demonstrate hate.[133]

The person who makes this claim is "in the darkness." He is not enjoying intimate fellowship with God who is Light. "Until now" implies that this condition can end.

2:10                    "… whoever loves his brother remains in the light; and being in the light he can both see where he is going, and therefore avoid yielding constantly to temptation, and also (as a result) avoid causing others to fall."[134]

"… the Gospel light not only illumines the understanding, but warms the heart into love."[135]

"Want of love is the most prolific source of offenses."[136]

The "cause" of "stumbling" in this verse is hatred in the heart. Hatred causes the hater to stumble in his or her walk with God (cf. John 11:9).

2:11           The hater's sin affects him in three ways: (1) It places him "in the darkness," outside of God's fellowship. (2) It leads to aimless activity ("does not know where he is going") in which he is in great spiritual danger and in which there is the possibility of a fall (cf. John 9:41). (3) It also results in mental confusion ("blinded his eyes"; cf. John 12:35). The Christian who hates his brother loses his sense of spiritual direction in life, either partially or totally—if his hatred continues. No course of life is more dangerous for a Christian than one that includes hatred toward another believer.

"By saying that someone walks in darkness, John means that his or her ethical and spiritual life is benighted."[137]

"The penalty of living in the darkness is not merely that one does not see, but that one goes blind."[138]

John argued that intimate fellowship with God is possible only when a person has renounced sin in his or her life (1:5—2:2) and is obedient to God (2:3-11), especially by loving his or her fellow believers (2:7-11).

III.     Resisting enemies 2:12-27

"In this section … John refers to the Revisionists [those people among his readers who were teaching false doctrine] directly. In so doing he makes clear the overall purpose of the epistle. The appearance of these 'antichrists' on the scene is what has occasioned this letter. Appropriately, the apostle's concern is with the threat they constitute to the readers' continuing fellowship with God (cf. 1:3). Of course, no matter how much the readership might be misled, there was no danger to their eternal salvation; although, as we shall see, there was a threat to their assurance of salvation."[139]

A.     Appreciating Spiritual Advances 2:12-14

John began this section of his letter by affirming the spiritual competence of his readers. He reminded them of their spiritual blessings in order to motivate them to cultivate more intimate fellowship with God.

"Verses 12-14 clearly reveal that John does not regard his readers as 'false professors.' Viewing this epistle as presenting 'tests' by which to determine the genuineness of a person's salvation misreads the epistle."[140]

"Because his readers are Christians and have in part experienced the power of their faith he moves them to nobler efforts; his object is that their 'joy may be fulfilled' (cf. 1. 4)."[141]

This pericope (section of text) contains two series of three sentences. Each sentence begins, "I am writing to you … because …"

2:12-13b    Who did John have in mind when he addressed his readers as "little children," "fathers," and "young men"? Perhaps he meant those who physically fell into these categories. If he did, what about his female readers and others who were not in these categories?

Perhaps he was thinking of those in his audience who were children, men, and youths in their spiritual development.[142] If this is what he meant, why did he address them in this unnatural order? We could ask the same question about the first possibility too.

Perhaps John first addressed all of his readers as little children (vv. 1, 28; 3:7, 18; 4:4; 5:21; cf. John 21:5), and then spoke more specifically to the more mature or older (the fathers), and lastly to the less mature or younger (the young men).[143] Yet what he said to the three groups is so similar that it seems more likely that he was addressing three distinct groups.

It may be that John used these three stages of life to describe qualities typical of each age group that ought to characterize all believers.[144] I think he was addressing the children (newer believers), fathers (mature believers), and young men (less mature but not new believers) among his readers in terms of their spiritual development.

Another problem is whether John meant that he was writing "because" the stated condition was true of each group, or "so that" the condition might become true of them. The Greek particle hoti can have either sense: causal or declarative, and John could have intended both meanings. However, the causal meaning seems a bit more probable.[145]

The spiritual "little children" (new believers) among John's readers had known forgiveness by their heavenly Father (cf. 1:5—2:2). Forgiveness is one of the first things that a new believer appreciates about his or her salvation.

The "fathers" had experienced fellowship with Jesus Christ ("you know Him who has been from the beginning"; cf. John 1:1). The father figure suggests someone who has had some fellowship with Christ over time (cf. John 1:1), not Christians who had led others to faith and were therefore their spiritual fathers.

The spiritually "young men" among the readers had known some victory over their spiritual adversary, Satan ("you have overcome the evil one"; cf. 2:15-23).[146]

John mentioned these three experiences in their proper experiential sequence in the Christian life. That is, a Christian typically appreciates forgiveness as a new believer, then appreciates having fellowship with Christ, and then overcomes the evil one.

"The designation young men follows fathers because the readers' invaluable experience as little children (the forgiveness of sins) and as fathers (the knowledge of God) renders them vigorous young men prepared to do battle with Satan."[147]

2:13c-14    John then proceeded to point out other characteristics of his readers, again by using the same three stages of life to illustrate their progress. Perhaps John repeated the cycle of descriptions in order to assure his readers that he was aware of their growth and strength in the faith. This would have encouraged them.

In the first series of three (vv. 12-13b) we have the minimal spiritual experience for each stage of spiritual growth. In the second series of three (vv. 13c-14), we have the more advanced spiritual experience for each stage.

The spiritually "little children" (Gr. teknion, born ones, used in v. 12) know that God has forgiven their sins. But "children" (Gr. paidion, taught ones, used in this verse) can advance to know the Father more intimately ("you know the Father"). John implied that the new Christians among his readership had advanced from just appreciating that God had forgiven their sins. They had been taught and had learned to know God the Father to some extent in their experience.

Both statements about "fathers" (Gr. pateres, used in both verses) are identical, because there can be no variation here. When one knows Christ, the only thing that one can do in order to advance is to get to know Him better.

John initially said the "young men" (Gr. neaviskoi, used in both verses) had defeated the evil one, but he said nothing of their condition after gaining the victory. They could have become weak and vulnerable. However the second statement about them adds that they "are strong" and that "the word of God remains in" them. This is a more robust spiritual condition. They had grown strong by abiding in God's Word.

John emphasized the sense of progress in these verses in the following way: He used present tense verbs in the first set of sentences (vv. 12-13b), which describe ongoing action. Then he used aorist tense verbs in the second set (vv. 13c-14), which imply a state of greater spiritual maturity.

"In all the main Johannine writings—Gospel (John 16:33), First Epistle (1 John 4:4; 5:4-5) and Revelation (Rev. 2:7, 11, 17, 26; 3:5, 12, 21; 5:5; 12:11; 15:2; 21:7) alike—the theme of overcoming is present, and in all it is through Christ, the supreme Overcomer, that His people overcome."[148]

Of the 28 occurrences of the verb nikao ("to conquer" or "to be victorious") in the New Testament, 24 are in John's writings. The noun nika ("victory") appears in 1 John 5:4. Thus the victory motif is prominent in John's writings.[149]

In this section of verses John was not saying that his readers were all immature or all mature. He was acknowledging their spiritual state and their progress in order to encourage them to press on to know the Lord better and to pursue more intimate fellowship with Him.

As noted before, a popular interpretation of 1 John that many commentators have advocated is that John wrote this epistle to enable his readers to determine whether they were true believers. The questions that John raised throughout the epistle, they say, were "tests of [the presence of spiritual] life."[150] However, in the verses just considered (vv. 12-14), John did not say he was writing to test his readers' salvation. He said that he was writing to them because they were genuine believers. John challenged his readers with tests of fellowship rather than with tests of regeneration.

"It would be hard to devise an approach to John's first epistle more hopelessly misguided or more completely self-defeating [than the tests of regeneration approach]. If the premise on which this approach is based were true, it would be quite impossible for either the original audience of 1 John or any of its subsequent readers to possess the assurance of salvation. Since the writer repeatedly enjoins the 'abiding' life marked by obedience to Christ's commands, one cannot really be certain until the end of his earthly experience whether he has abided or persevered in the requisite obedience. Meanwhile, one must entertain the possibility that he is a spurious Christian! Few errors of contemporary exposition are more blatant than this one. Not only does John not say that he is writing to 'test' whether his readers are saved or not, he says the reverse [in 1:3-4]!"[151]

B.     Recognizing Spiritual Adversaries 2:15-27

Having encouraged the readers with affirmations that their spiritual condition was very good (2:12-14), John turned next to the enemies that they must face: the world (2:15-17) and the antichrists (2:18-27).

1.     Overcoming the World 2:15-17

"'Love the Father' (v. 5), 'love the brethren' (vers. 9-11), is the sum of St John's exhortations; 'love not the world' is the key-note of his warnings and dehortations [negative exhortations]."[152]

John warned his readers of worldly dangers that face the Christian as he or she seeks to get to know God better. He did this in order to enable them to prepare for and overcome these obstacles with God's help.

"The author is convinced that his readers have fellowship with God. He forcefully reassures them that they are in a state of grace. At the same time, however, he is aware of the temptations they are still exposed to from the world."[153]

"As often in 1 John, a section of parenesis [reminders of what the readers already knew or were doing or of what they knew they should avoid] follows a series of dogmatic statements."[154]

The New Testament uses the term "world" (Gr. kosmos) in at least three ways: Sometimes "the world" refers to planet earth, the physical world (e.g., Acts 17:24). Sometimes it refers to humankind, the human world (e.g., John 3:16), and sometimes it refers to human culture as influenced by Satan: the world system. John used the word in the last of these ways here.

John again presented three pairs, as he did in verses 12 through 14.


V. 15 The love of the world …


The love of the Father …

V. 16 … comes from the world.

comes from the Father.

V. 17 The world passes away.

The one who obeys God remains forever.


2:15           The Greek negative prohibition me, occurring with a present active imperative verb, means either stop doing something, or do not have the habit of doing it. The term "the world" (kosmos) describes the system of values, priorities, and beliefs that unbelievers hold that excludes God (cf. John 14:30; Gal. 6:14; Eph. 2:2; 2 Pet. 2:20). In this context it does not refer to the world of creation or the world of humanity in general, which God loves (John 3:16).

"The cosmos means to him [John] the prevailing spiritual and moral order of human affairs; and this system of things is hostile to God and alien from His love, and therefore radically evil and doomed to perish."[155]

"The world is that organized system which acts as a rival to God."[156]

"The world" is a moral and spiritual system designed to draw people away from God. It is a seductive system that appeals to all people, believers as well as unbelievers, and calls for our affection, participation, and loyalty (cf. John 3:16-17, 18-19; James 4:4). Satan controls this system, and believers should shun it (cf. 5:19; John 12:31; 14:30). As noted above, here kosmos does not refer primarily to the created order, though that order is also passing away (1 Cor. 7:31; 2 Pet. 3:7-13; Rev. 21:1-4).[157]

"It is the Father who is in opposition to the world (I John 2:15). … It is the Spirit who is in opposition to the flesh (Gal. 5:16, 25; Rom. 8:12, 13). It is Christ who is in opposition to Satan, or antichrist (I John 3:8; Heb. 2:14, 15; I John 4:2, 3)."[158]

"If" assumes that some Christians will love the world (third class condition in Greek), which is unfortunately often true to reality. One writer responded to the question of many: What's so bad about the world?[159]

"The love of the Father" is probably the believers' love for the Father (objective genitive), not His love for us (subjective genitive).[160] "In him" again reflects a controlling influence (cf. 1:8; 2:4). If anyone loves the world, his or her love for the Father is not what is driving him or her. His or her love for the world is.

2:16           John summarized the appeal of the world system as three-fold. Here is a picture of the infernal trinity, the three faces of the world, the three sources of worldly temptation (cf. Gen. 3; Matt. 4). Lusts are cravings or desires, and in the context they are evil because they are not in harmony with God's will.

"The lust of the flesh" is the desire to do something apart from the will of God. It includes all corrupt bodily desires and every sinful activity that appeals to the sinful hearts of people. "The lust of the eyes" is the desire to have something apart from the will of God. Whatever is appealing to our senses, but is not properly ours to desire or obtain, falls into this category. "The boastful pride of life" is the desire to be something apart from the will of God. It refers to boastful pretension in earthly matters.

The first desire appeals mainly to the body, the second appeals to the soul (mind or intellect), and the third to the spirit. Perhaps the most common manifestation of "the lust of the flesh" in modern western civilization is illicit sex (hedonism, idolizing pleasure). Perhaps the most common manifestation of "the lust of the eyes" is excessive buying (materialism, idolizing possessions). Perhaps the most common manifestation of "the … pride of life" is trying to control people, circumstances, history, or even God (egoism, idolizing power).

"Hence lust of the flesh means such desires as are prompted by the internal pressures of our human nature. The lust of the eyes means the desire aroused in us by external objects or persons. The pride of life indicates the arrogance that comes from possessions or power."[161]

Matthew Henry called the lust of the flesh luxury, the lust of the eyes covetousness, and the pride of life ambition.[162] Zane Hodges defined the lust of the flesh as "every illicit physical activity that appeals to people's sinful hearts," the lust of the eyes "whatever is visually appealing but not proper to desire or obtain," and the pride of life "the vain display of earthly life … (arrogance, pretentiousness, or boasting about self, possessions, or accomplishments)."[163]

"The 'wants' which man feels can be divided into two great classes. Some things he desires to appropriate personally: some things he desires to enjoy without appropriation. The desire of the flesh embraces the one class (e.g. gratification of appetites); the desire of the eyes the other (e.g. pursuit of art as an end)."[164]

"Pride is a perverse attitude of mind making us forget our dependence on God and leading to self-glorification. At the same time it prevents people from paying attention to their fellows."[165]

"'Pride of life' will be reflected in whatever status symbol is important to me or seems to define my identity. When I define myself to others in terms of my honorary [or earned] degrees, the reputation of the church I serve, my annual income, the size of my library, my expensive car or house, and if in doing this I misrepresent the truth and in my boasting show myself to be only a pompous fool who has deceived no one, then I have succumbed to what John calls the pride of life."[166]

"The 'vainglory of life' that St John ascribes to 'the world,' is therefore an ostentation of worldly possessions or advantages, the disposition to 'show off' and to make other people look small."[167]

"The same three foes appear in the three classes of soil on which the divine seed falls: the wayside hearers, the devil; the thorns, the world; the rock undersoil, the flesh."[168]

These three basic desires come from the world system, "not from the Father," and the believer should pursue the Father's desires rather than those of the world. The Father desires our welfare, but the world will destroy us (v. 17).

"'From the Father' (Greek ek with genitive) does not denote origin, but as often in John, nature. It does not mean that everything in the world comes from it; rather it means that evil behaviors are altogether worldly and as such are contrary to what God wills."[169]

"Morality is not the grounds for assurance [of salvation], but the fruit of it."[170]


The Christian's Three-Fold Enemy

 The Problem

The Solution

The World

(1 John 2:15-17)

Lust of the flesh

Lust of the eyes

Pride of life


(1 Tim. 6:11; 2 Tim. 2:22)

The flesh

(Rom. 7:18-24)


(Rom. 6:12-13; 8:13)

The devil

(1 Peter 5:8)


(1 Peter 5:9)


John not only helped us to identify the infernal trinity in the Book of Revelation (the dragon and the two beasts in chs. 12 and 13), but he also gave much revelation in this epistle about "how each Person of the Godhead works with and through the others to accomplish God's plan of salvation for us."[171]


The Trinity in 1 John

"God the Father

God the Son

God the Holy Spirit

Through Christ, we have fellowship with the Father (1:3).

Jesus is called 'the Word of life' (1:1).

The Spirit indwells us and gives assurance of salvation (3:24).

God is light (1:5).

Jesus' blood cleanses us from sin (1:7).

The Spirit causes us to confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh (4:2).

The Father has great love for His children (3:1).

Jesus is our Advocate with the Father (2:1).

The Spirit is the gift of God to all believers (4:13).

God is 'greater than our heart, and knows all things' (3:20).

Jesus is the propitiation for our sin (2:2).

The Spirit bears witness to the truth and to Jesus Christ (5:6).

God is love (4:8).

Jesus is sinless (3:5).

The Spirit is one with the Father and the Son (5:7, 8).

God 'sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins' (4:10).

The Son of God destroyed the works of the devil (3:8).


God abides in believers, and they in Him (4:15).

Jesus has come in the flesh (4:2).


God is the Giver of eternal life through Jesus Christ (5:11).

The Son is the Savior of the world (4:14).



The Son is the source of eternal life (5:11).



Believing in the Son of God is necessary for us to inherit eternal life (5:13)."[172]



2:17           Another reason that we should not pursue the lusts of the world is that this system, along with its desires, is in the process of passing out of existence. Actually we are living in what John called "the last hour" of the world's existence (v. 18). The world is only temporary and fleeting (cf. 1 Peter).

In spite of this, those who do God's will abide ("continues to live") forever. Since all Christians will live forever (John 10:28), John was not saying that we attain eternal life by our obedience. However, we can also abide (i.e., enjoy an intimate relationship with God and abundantly experience God's eternal life) now, not just after death, when we obey God.

"Just as Abraham through obedience to God obtained the title 'the friend of God' (cf. James 2:21-23), by which he is known today in three world religions and will be known forever, so too the obedient Christian can attain this same identity by obedience (John 15:14-15). Likewise, it would be reasonable to conclude that the Christian's identity in eternity will be determined by obedience to God in time. And since all lives of obedience are unique in their particulars, each eternal 'identity' will be as unique as the snowflakes that fall from heaven."[173]

Resisting the appeal of the world is difficult for every believer. John urged his readers, in view of its attractiveness, to understand the avenues of its temptation and to remember four things: (1) Love for the world indicates lack of love for God (v. 15). (2) It prevents intimate fellowship with God (v. 15). (3) It results in consequences that are not what our loving heavenly Father desires for our welfare (v. 17). And (4) It lasts only a short time (v. 17).

2.     Resisting the Antichrists 2:18-27

John needed to alert his readers to the special deceptions that they would encounter in order to enable them to identify, and to defend themselves against, these temptations. Previously John had been less direct in dealing with false teachers who perverted the truth about intimacy with God. Now he became more direct and labeled them "antichrists."

John again used a three-fold structure at the beginning of this section of the text. He described three signs or marks of the end (vv. 18-19), of the believer (vv. 20-23), and of living in the light (vv. 24-25). Verses 26 and 27 recapitulate and develop the revelation given in verses 18 through 25.

A sign of the end 2:18-19

2:18           John probably used the Greek word paidia ("children," also in v. 12) here because it implies a child who learns. His readers needed to learn what he now revealed.

In the drama of human history all of John's readers, including ourselves, play our part in the last act (though there are several scenes in the last act). Throughout the New Testament the writers regarded the present inter-advent age, after the Incarnation and before the Lord's return for His own, as "the last hour" or "the last days." This is the final period before the Lord Himself breaks into history again and raptures the church. Then the first stage of the new era will be judgment (the Tribulation), and the second stage, blessing. In the second stage, Jesus Christ will rule directly over human beings, first in the Millennium, and then in the new heavens and the new earth.

"The hour is a term repeatedly used in the Gospel of John for the crisis of the earthly course of Jesus, the supreme epoch of His death and return to the Father. This guides us to St John's meaning here. … The 'last hour' closes a succession of hours; it is the end of an expiring day."[174]

The revelation concerning the appearance of the world ruler ("antichrist") who will exalt himself against God was familiar to John's audience (Dan. 11:36-45; Matt. 24; Mark 13; 2 Thess. 2:3-5; 2 John 7; Rev. 12—13).[175] However, even as John wrote, many little "antichrists," people who exalt themselves against God, had arisen. "Antichrists" are those people who oppose Jesus Christ and His teachings and/or people who profess to be the Messiah.[176] The first "beast" in Revelation 13 will profess to be the Messiah, and the second "beast" in that chapter will oppose Christ.[177]

"Anti ["against"] can mean substitution or opposition, but both ideas are identical in the word antichristos (in N.T. only here, 2:22; 4:3; II John 7)."[178]

"The enemy of the young men [vv. 13-14] is the world, and the enemy of the babes in Christ [v. 18] is the false teacher."[179]

"The important advice to the babes in Christ is to feed on the Word of God [cf. Heb. 5:12-14; 1 Pet. 2:2]."[180]

2:19           Those who were opposing Christ had gone out from "us." "Us" may mean the apostolic eyewitnesses, as it often does elsewhere in this epistle (cf. 1:1-5; 4:6). This would mean that these false teachers had gone out from among the apostles, not that they were apostles themselves necessarily, claiming that their message was what the apostles endorsed (cf. Acts 15:1; 2 Cor. 11:5). "Us" elsewhere in this epistle refers to the believing community (cf. 1:6—2:2), and I think it probably means that here. Some false teachers evidently had been members of local house-churches and then left them because of doctrinal differences. The physical separation of these people from the apostles and the faithful eventually illustrated their doctrinal separation from them.

"From other references to 'antichrists' in this letter it is evident that when the writer uses this term he means the heterodox ex-members of his own community: those who, in one way or another, were denying the true identity of Jesus, and the fact of God's saving activity mediated to the world through him."[181]

"… it is possible, in this instance, that those who later allowed their heretical thought and actions to run away with them (when it could obviously be said, ouk esan ex emon, 'they were not of us') were in the first place believers with a genuine, if uninformed, faith in Jesus."[182]

"If you will investigate the history of the false cults and antichristian religious systems in today's world, you will find that in most cases their founders started out in a local church! They were 'with us' but not 'of us,' so they went out 'from us' and started their own groups."[183]

"… a person who makes a genuine confession can be expected to persevere in his faith, although elsewhere John warns his readers against the danger of failure to persevere [cf. v. 24; 2 John 8]."[184]

Perseverance in faith and good works is normal for a Christian, but it is not inevitable. Hence we have all the warnings and exhortations to continue in faith and good works in the New Testament.

Whereas divisions within Christendom create obvious problems, God causes some good to come out of them by using these divisions to clarify doctrinal differences and deviations from the truth.

A sign of the believer 2:20-23

2:20-21      In contrast to the heterodox secessionists (v. 19), the faithful believers within the community were keeping the faith. The "anointing" referred to is evidently the Holy Spirit, whom Jesus gives to each believer at conversion (Rom. 8:9; 1 Cor. 12:13; cf. Luke 4:18; John 6:69; 14:17, 26; 15:26; 16:13; Acts 4:27; 10:38; 2 Cor. 1:21-22). John said that this anointing abode in his readers to teach them ("you all know"), and that it was truthful (v. 27).

"Anointing designates something for sacred use."[185]

John referred to the Holy Spirit (sent "from the Holy One," i.e., from Christ) as the "anointing" (cf. John 14—16), and he ascribed a teaching role, which is a personal function, to Him. This seems preferable to the idea that the Word of God is the anointing.[186] John previously spoke of Jesus Christ as "the life" (1:2). The presence of the Holy Spirit in every believer enables him or her to perceive the truth of the gospel and to distinguish truth from error (John 14:26; 16:13).

Of course some Christians have more spiritual perception than others, due to God-given ability, Satanic blindness, the influence of human teachers, sin in the life, etc. The knowledge that John believed that his readers had was evidently the knowledge of "the truth" about the Person and work of Christ, in view of the context.

2:22-23      The antichrists lie because they deny "that Jesus is the Christ," God's Son and our Savior (cf. John 11:25-27). This would have been the position, not only of the Jews who rejected Jesus as the Messiah, but of other false teachers to whom John alluded elsewhere. Among these were the Gnostics, who believed that anything material was sinful, and therefore Jesus could not have been God's Son.[187] They considered "Jesus" and "the Christ" as two distinct entities.[188]

Docetists taught that Jesus was not truly a man and therefore could not be our Savior. Followers of Cerinthus, who was a Gnostic teacher, believed that Jesus was not fully God, but that God only came upon Him at His baptism and later departed from Him before His crucifixion.[189]

These false teachers all claimed to have the truth from God. However John pointed out that, since "the Son" and "the Father" are one, a person cannot deny the Son without denying the Father as well (cf. Matt. 10:32-33; Mark 8:38; John 12:44-45; 14:10-11).

"… anyone who claims to know God, but disobeys his orders, is 'a' liar (… 2:4); but the person who denies that Jesus is the Christ must be regarded as the—archetypal—liar …"[190]

"… we [also] deny God by denying him his proper relationship with us."[191]

Some readers have understood the first part of verse 23 to mean that it is impossible for a true Christian, one who has the Father, ever to deny the Son. This interpretation seems inconsistent with other Scripture (2 Tim. 2:12) as well as human experience. Some genuine Christians have denied Christ—in order to avoid martyrdom, for example. In the context, John wrote about an abiding relationship with God, not just a saving relationship.

So a second explanation is that John meant that whoever denies the Son does not have the Father abiding in him. According to this view one who denies the Son does not have an abiding relationship with the Father. This describes all unbelievers as well as those believers who are not abiding in God.

A third explanation is that John was describing what is typical. Typically those having the Father do not deny the Son, though there may be a few exceptions. However, the broad term "whoever" in this verse seems to imply that what John wrote is true of all. I prefer view two.

The second part of verse 23 is the positive corollary to the first part. Confessing "the Son" is the opposite of denying Him. Confessing the Son results in the Father abiding in the confessor ("has the Father also"). Confessing the Son involves a public profession of faith in Him, not just exercising saving faith in Him (cf. Rom. 10:9-10; 2 Cor. 4:13). Belief in the heart results in imputed righteousness, and confession with the mouth results in salvation, namely, deliverance from the consequences of being a secret, non-confessing, believer.

A non-abiding Christian might not confess Christ, even though he or she believes in Him. Both denying Christ and confessing Christ deal with giving personal testimony to one's faith in Him. These actions do not determine salvation. Thus denying Christ cannot result in the loss of eternal salvation, nor can confessing Him obtain it.

If John meant that no genuine Christian can deny the Son, the corollary is that every genuine Christian confesses the Son. That would make public confession of Christ a condition for salvation in addition to trusting in Him, but this lacks biblical support.

To summarize, John warned his readers of the danger to their intimate fellowship with God that the teaching of those who denied that Jesus is the Christ posed. If they rejected the Son they could not expect to have an intimate relationship with the Father.

"The principle source of confusion in much contemporary study of 1 John is to be found in the failure to recognize the real danger against which the writer is warning. The eternal salvation of the readership is not imperilled [sic]. It is not even in doubt as far as the author is concerned. But seduction by the world and its antichristian representatives is a genuine threat which must be faced."[192]

A sign of living in the light 2:24-25

John now called on his readers to abide in the true doctrine of Jesus Christ in order to enable them to abide in fellowship with God.

2:24           Christians should not reject the truth that they believed, which they "heard from the beginning" and that resulted in their salvation (cf. the warning passages in Hebrews). Such faithfulness enables us to continue to abide ("remain") in fellowship with God. John used "remains" (abides) in the same sense in which Jesus did in the Upper Room Discourse. Abiding refers to an intimate relationship with God that is determined by the extent to which we walk in the light of God's word that we have. Abiding, fellowship, and knowing God refer to the same thing, and we experience fellowship by degrees, rather than either completely or not at all (John 15:1-8). John's insistence that his readers really did know God and His truth would have strengthened them in their resolve to resist the false teachers (vv. 12-14, 21).

2:25           Our "eternal life" is not in question when we believe that Jesus is the Christ, as some of the antichrists then and now suggest that it is. It is secure because it rests on God's "promise": "The one who believes in the Son has eternal life" (John 3:36; cf. John 6:47; et al.). This is the only time that John used the Greek word epaggelia, "promise," in all of his writings.

The importance of keeping the faith 2:26-27

2:26           The "these things" in view probably refer primarily to what John had just written (vv. 18-25), though one of his concerns in the whole letter was to warn his readers about false teachers.

"The author concludes his attack on the false teachers with a warning and a word of encouragement for his followers."[193]

"You indicates that it is possible for believers to be deceived by false teaching."[194]

James Allman believed that this verse, along with 5:13, articulates John's purposes in writing this epistle: "to show readers how to identify reliable teachers, and to confirm believers in their faith."[195]

2:27           "The anointing" is the Holy Spirit (cf. v. 20). The readers had the Holy Spirit within them ("which you received from Him [Jesus]"), whose ministry it is to guide believers into all the truth and to "teach" them what God has revealed (John 14:26; 16:13). Consequently they were not dependent on other human teachers, especially the false teachers.

From this verse some Christians have concluded that we should not listen to any human teacher. That is not what John meant or was saying. He wanted his readers to remember that the Holy Spirit was their true Teacher, the ultimate source of spiritual illumination. He was not ruling out secondary teachers through whom the Holy Spirit works in teaching. If that had been his view he would not have written this epistle in which he himself taught his readers.

John's point was that we should not look to other human beings as the ultimate source of our learning, which is an attitude that the false teachers were encouraging. The Holy Spirit uses the Word of God as His textbook to teach us (John 16:14-15). So John was not saying that we can discard our Bibles. Since immature believers do need human teachers (Heb. 5:12), though they are not completely dependent on them, John's readers apparently were fairly mature in the faith. God has given human teachers as a gift to His church (Eph. 4:11; 1 Cor. 12:28; cf. Rom. 12:7).

"John obviously uses slight irony here ["you have no need for anyone to teach you"]. … John means that what he is urging on them is fairly self-evident …"[196]

The readers' anointing was real ("the anointing which you received"). The false teachers probably claimed that God had inspired them, but He had not. John was warning his readers about false teachers who claimed revelation beyond what Jesus Christ and the apostles had taught. We simply need to abide in God ("remain in Him") and to respond positively to the Holy Spirit's ministry to us (cf. John 15:4-7).

John's original readers were doing well in their walk with God. John began this section of his epistle (2:12-27) by affirming their healthful spiritual condition (2:12-14). He then warned them of their spiritual adversaries (2:15-27): the allurements of the world (2:15-17) and the enticements of false teachers (2:18-27).

There is a parallel between what John urged his readers to do in this section of his epistle and what Moses commanded the Israelites to do. In both cases the holiness of God demanded that those who came into the closest and most intimate contact with God, in the Tabernacle and in the church, be holy. Moses advocated renouncing sin, obeying God, rejecting worldliness, and keeping the faith in the Mosaic Law: in the Covenant Code (Exod. 20—23; 25—31), the Priestly Code (Exod. 35—Lev. 16), and the Holiness Code (Lev. 17:10—25:55). John similarly urged his readers to renounce sin (1:8—2:2), to obey God (2:3-11), to reject worldliness (2:12-17), and to keep the faith (2:18-27). In each case the prophet's concern was that those believers under their care would be holy as God is holy (Lev. 11:44-45; 19:2; 20:7; 1 Pet. 1:15-16). Holiness is imperative for God's people to know, see, and have fellowship with a holy God (cf. Heb. 12:10-14).

IV.    Living in Anticipation of Christ's Judgment Seat 2:28—4:19

"The warning against the antichrists or, as we have called them, the Revisionists, is now finished. The apostle's burden has been to affirm the high spiritual caliber of his readership and to urge them to continue to live the 'abiding' life, which they are currently doing. In the face of the false teaching of the Revisionists, they are to cling to the truth they have heard from the beginning and to allow that truth to shape them inwardly. To go the direction of the antichrists is to forfeit all the rich experience which abiding in the Son and in the Father makes possible. But what exactly is the abiding experience like? Although John has already pointed out that it involves a Christlike walk (2:6), he has said little about its exact character. Yet it is already clear that it involves obedience to the command to love one another (cf. 2:7-11). Beginning at this point in the epistle, love becomes a controlling and overriding theme."[197]

The section before us (2:28—4:19) constitutes the main part of this letter. That it is a unit is clear from the structural inclusio.[198] Note the statements, in 2:28, "that … we may have confidence … at His coming," and in 4:17, "that we may have confidence in the day of judgment," that bracket the unit.

"From 1.5 onwards to 2.27 St John has been working out and expanding his conception of the fellowship with God, and in God, that is realized through the message brought by Jesus Christ, under the conception of dwelling and walking 'in the light.' … But from this paragraph [2:28—3:3] forwards the fellowship of the soul and God takes on a more intimate character, a more vivid colour and a warmer tone, as it opens out into sonship toward God and brotherhood toward men."[199]

A.     Abiding to Face Christ Confidently 2:28

John introduced the new idea of the believer's meeting with Jesus Christ at death or the Rapture ("when He appears") in order to motivate his readers to continue to cultivate intimate fellowship with God. The prospect of meeting Jesus remained the basis for John's instruction through 4:19. Verse 28 is the theme verse, because it sets the agenda for what follows in this major portion of the epistle. This verse is also a Janus that looks in two directions: backward to summarize the preceding section,[200] and forward to introduce the following section. Janus was the Roman god of beginnings and endings who supposedly guarded portals. He had two faces, one on the front and the other on the back of his head. The month of January gets its name from him. It is the month in which we look backward on the past year and forward to the new year.

The Greek word translated "remain" (or abide, meno) appeared no less than seven times in 2:12 through 27. The exhortation to abide here, in verse 28, is the outworking of John's concern to abide in 2:12 through 27. The fact of the Lord's appearing is certain ("when He appears"), even though its time is indefinite. John implied that Christ's return for His own might be while his readers were still alive.[201]

Other passages that teach the imminence of Christ's return include 1 Corinthians 1:8; 4:5; 15:51 and 52; 16:22; Philippians 3:20; 4:5; 1 Thessalonians 1:10; 2 Thessalonians 1:10 through 12; Titus 2:13; James 5:7 through 9; and Revelation 3:11; 22:7, 12, 17, and 20. "Confidence" (Gr. parresia) is "freedom or boldness of speech" that comes as a result of a clear conscience. John's idea was that if we walk in fellowship with God now we will not feel embarrassed to meet Him whenever we see Him (cf. Mark 8:38). The prospect of seeing Jesus Christ one day—possibly soon—should motivate us to abide in Him now (cf. James 5:8).

"There is nothing that will affect your life as much as the knowledge that you are going to stand in the presence of Christ and give an account of your works."[202]

"We must work on from hour to hour with our eye upon the audit, that we may not be ashamed of the record which will be found in the volume of the book."[203]

"Even though eternal salvation is an entirely free gift which can never be lost, the New Testament makes plain that the believer must give an account of his or her Christian life in the presence of Christ (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:10; Romans 14:10-12). As is shown by the texts just cited, as well as by 1 Corinthians 3:11-15, this judgment is not merely a review of our good deeds, but a comprehensive review that embraces both 'good and bad' (2 Corinthians 5:10). Therefore, shame is decidedly possible at the Judgment Seat. This is all the more true since Christians at that time will have their eternal bodies. Thus sin will no longer inhibit appropriate regret and embarrassment about those things in one's earthly life that did not please the Lord."[204]

Does "we" in this verse refer to John and the other apostles or to all Christians generally? If John was referring to the apostles, he meant that the apostles would not be ashamed at the Judgment Seat of Christ—if the readers continued to abide in Christ.[205] If he was referring to all Christians generally, he meant that believers would not be ashamed if they continued to abide in Christ. In either case, the point is clear: abiding in Christ precludes "shame" when Christ appears.

B.     Learning to Recognize God's Children 2:29—3:10a

John began a new line of thought, within his discussion of abiding in Christ, in order to develop the theme of preparing to meet the Lord unashamed, which is indicated in the Greek text by the absence of a connective (a construction known as asyndeton). The theme of this section is the idea of manifestation, which begins it, in 2:28 ("appears"), and ends it, in 3:10a ("obvious"). This is another inclusio.

2:29           Because God is "righteous" every child of God will normally demonstrate righteous behavior ("everyone who practices righteousness also has been born of Him"). Righteous action is a mark (a telltale sign or family trait) of the Father that God reproduces in every abiding Christian, just as surely as every child does some things like the physical parent that he or she seeks to imitate. We intellectually know that God is righteous from Scripture. But we experientially come to know that certain people are Christians by the righteous works that they do. The fact that some unrighteous people behave righteously, and some righteous people behave wickedly, do not destroy this point.

"We must not make this verse say more than it does. John certainly does not say, 'Whoever does not do righteousness is not born of Him.' That would be an inference in no way justified by John's statement. He is not talking here about how we can decide if a person is saved. If we know that a person believes (cf. 1 John 5:1 …), we can know he is saved. But here, John is clearly concerned with the deduction which we can make if we know that God is righteous. If that is known, it follows that one who to any extent reproduces His righteous nature is actually manifesting that nature and can rightly be perceived as born of Him."[206]

"This verse does not say that everyone who is born of God practices righteousness. Believers can walk in darkness and sin (1:6, 8; 2:1). The point here is that when a child exhibits the nature of his or her father, he or she is perceived as the child of the father."[207]

Practicing righteousness is normal, but not inevitable, for one who is truly "born of" God. Such behavior identifies one as a Christian.[208] However not everyone who practices righteous behavior is a Christian, because non-Christians can behave righteously, and Christians can walk in darkness. Therefore we should not judge a person's salvation by his or her behavior.

3:1             The Holy Spirit's production of righteous behavior in Christians is evidence of God's "great … love" for us. John used "love" language more frequently in 1 John (46 times) and in his Gospel (44 times) than any other New Testament writer.[209] Scripture calls us God's "children" (Gr. tekna) because that is what He has made us. The name simply expresses the reality. This is the Christian's true identity.[210]

"The thought here is of the community of nature with the prospect of development (teknon, comp. 2 Pet. 1. 4), and not of the position of privilege (huios)."[211]

John never used the title huios, "son," to describe the relation of Christians to God. He reserved huios to describe the relation of Jesus to God (cf. 3:2, 10; 5:2).

Unbelievers cannot fully comprehend the children of God ("the world does not know us"). The reason for this lack of perception is their failure to comprehend God ("Him") fully. Since they do not know the Parent, they do not know the children either (cf. John 1:12-13; 5:37; 7:28; 16:3).

"The author wants his readers to know that approval by the world is to be feared, not desired. To be hated by the world may be unpleasant, but ultimately it should reassure the members of the community of faith that they are loved by God, which is far more important than the world's hatred."[212]

"… the world hates the children of God (3:13), just as it hated Jesus (Jn. 15:18f.), since they do not belong to the world. This very fact is a further proof that the readers are children of God: the way in which the world does not recognize them as being on its side is proof that they belong to God."[213]

Note that the antecedent of "Him" is "the Father." But what John wrote of the Father (the world "did not know Him") was also true of Jesus (cf. John 1:12).

3:2                      "Having spoken of our present dignity, the Apostle goes on to speak of our future destiny."[214]

Even though we are presently God's children, we do not yet fully reflect His image as we will. However "when" (not "if," another third class condition in Greek) Jesus Christ "appears" and "we … see Him," we will experience full transformation and "be like Him" (i.e., glorified). Evidently just seeing Jesus Christ will fully transform us physically and spiritually (cf. 1 Cor. 13:12).

"Can you think of anything more wonderful than seeing Jesus? We have sung about Him, talked about Him, studied about Him, communicated with Him, but the grand climax will be when we see Him."[215]

"A child of God is here and now, indeed, like a diamond that is crystal white within but is still uncut and shows no brilliant flashes from reflected facets."[216]

"He [the Christian] will not be anything essentially different hereafter, but he will be what he is now essentially more completely, though in ways wholly beyond our powers of imagination."[217]

John's references to Christ's appearing in 2:28 and 3:2 frame his references to the new birth in 2:29 and 3:1. Every true Christian will see Jesus Christ one day.

3:3             In the meantime, every Christian who anticipates seeing and knowing Jesus Christ fully—who "has this hope"—"purifies himself, just as He is pure" (cf. 2:1, 6, 29; 3:7, 16; 4:17; Matt. 5:8).[218] In the future, seeing and knowing Christ will have a completely purifying effect on us (cf. 2 Cor. 3:18).

"John states two reasons why the Christian ought to be pure. One is related to a past work of God [v. 1] and the second to a future work [v. 3]."[219]

3:4                      "In the preceding section John has been stressing the importance of continuing in Christ, doing what is right, and purifying oneself in anticipation of his coming. Now he deals more closely with the negative side of all this, the need for believers to abstain from sin and the possibility of their doing so."[220]

"The present vv, 3:4-9, form six strophes [sections], each of which divides … roughly into half. The two halves of the strophes balance one another; for the second part of the v provides a development of the first part (vv 4, 5, 7), or a parallel (vv 6, 9) or a contrast (v 8) to it."[221]

"Sin" stands in opposition to purity. Furthermore sin is very serious. The use of the Greek word translated "lawlessness" (anomia) carries a connotation of wickedness (cf. Matt. 7:23; 13:41; 24:12; 2 Thess. 2:7). It means rejection of law in its broadest extent, flagrant opposition to God, rather than just breaking specific laws.

"He [who acts lawlessly] acts without curb; for sin is the acting without the curb of law or restraint of another's authority, acting from our own will."[222]

Evidently the false teachers had a soft view of sin (cf. vv. 7-8).

3:5             Two more facts that believers "know" highlight the seriousness of sin: Jesus Christ became incarnate "in order to take away sins," and "in Him there is no sin." This is a strong assertion of Jesus' sinlessness (cf. 2:1; 3:3; Matt. 3:14; John 8:31-59; 10:30; 17:22; Acts 2:27; 3:14; 4:30; 7:52; 2 Cor. 5:21; Heb. 4:15; 1 Pet. 1:19; 2:22).

"Because Jesus was holy, and without sin, this can become the character of those who abide in him (cf. Heb 2:10—4:16; 5:9)."[223]

"The dominant thought here is not that of the self-sacrifice of Christ, but of His utter hostility to sin in every shape."[224]

3:6             If abiding (remaining) in God equals being a Christian, as many interpreters believe,[225] this verse appears to contradict what John wrote in 1:8 and 10. There he said that Christians sin (cf. 2:1; 15; 3:18; 5:16, 21). It also seems to contradict personal experience, since genuine Christians do indeed sin.

The key to understanding this statement, I believe, lies in the other terms that John used in the verse: "remains" (abides), "has seen," and "knows." John used these words throughout this epistle to refer to a believer who is walking in intimate fellowship with God (1:7; 2:3, 10). Still, does this view not contradict what John said about the depravity of sinners, even Christian sinners (1:8)?

I believe that John was claiming that while a Christian is walking in close fellowship with God, he does not sin. The abiding believer never repudiates God's authority over him by doing anything that resists God's law or will—while he is abiding in Christ. If he does, his fellowship with God suffers; He no longer "knows" God in that intimate sense. He no longer "sees" God because he has moved out of the light into darkness.

"John is thus saying that (translating the Gr. literally) 'everyone who lives in him (Jesus) does not sin'; and by this he means that an intimate and ongoing relationship with Christ (ho en auto menon, 'the one who lives in him,' using the present tense) precludes the practice of sin …"[226]

"In so far as he abides in Christ, so far is he free from all sin. The ideal of the Christian."[227]

"… he [John] shapes v. 6 to say that freedom from sin is the hallmark of those who are really in fellowship with Christ, and who have actually seen and know him."[228]

There was no sin whatsoever in Jesus Christ (v. 5). He consistently abode in (obeyed) the Father (cf. John 14:9). The Christian who consistently abides in a sinless Person does not sin (v. 6). If we could abide in Christ without interruption, we would be sinless. Unfortunately we cannot do that, because we continue to sin.

Some Christians have used this verse to support the theory that Christians are sinless and perfect. Scripture and experience contradict this position (e.g., 1:8-9; et al.). Others have used it to teach that a Christian does not habitually sin.[229] But this too is contrary to experience and the same Scripture. Advocates of this second view usually support it with the present tense of the Greek verb (harmartanei), which they take to mean "keeps on sinning" or "sins continually."

"In modern times a popular expedient for dealing with the difficulties perceived in 1 John 3:6, 9 is to appeal to the use of the Greek present tense. It is then asserted that this tense necessitates a translation like, 'Whoever has been born of God does not go on sinning,' or, 'does not continually sin.' The inference to be drawn from such renderings is that, though the Christian may sin somewhat (how much is never specified!), he may not sin regularly or persistently. But on all grounds, whether linguistic or exegetical, the approach is indefensible."[230]

"… this view is not free from difficulty. It involves translators in stressing the present continuous form of the verb in a way which they do not do elsewhere in the New testament."[231]

"As has been pointed out by more than one competent Greek scholar, the appeal to the present tense invites intense suspicion. No other text can be cited where the Greek present tense, unaided by qualifying words, can carry this kind of significance. Indeed, when the Greek writer or speaker wished to indicate that an action was, or was not, continual, there were special words to express this."[232]

"The perfect tense in Greek signifies a state of affairs. It is not concerned with the past occurrence of the event but with its reality, its existence."[233]

"The perfect tense here is not intended to categorize a person as either saved or unsaved, since even believers sin (1:8). Instead, the statement is intended to stigmatize all sin as the product, not only of not abiding, but also of ignorance and blindness toward God."[234]

If we were to translate 1:8 and 5:16, where the present tense also occurs: "do not continually have sin," and "continually sinning a sin," respectively, these verses would contradict 3:6. It would involve no self-deception to say that we do not continually have sin (1:8), since whoever is born of God does not continually sin (3:6). Furthermore if one born of God does not continually sin (3:1), how could a Christian see his brother Christian continually sinning (5:16)?

Suppose we translated the present tense in John 14:6 the same way: "no one continually comes to the Father except through Me." This would imply that occasionally someone might come to God in another way. No orthodox translator would offer that as an acceptable rendering of John 14:6, and it is not acceptable in 1 John 3:6 either.

"… it is not surprising that commentators have attempted to water down John's teaching to refer merely to the believer's freedom from habitual sin. But we must not misinterpret the text for pastoral reasons. Properly interpreted, the text remains a source of comfort."[235]

Other interpreters take John to mean that no one who abides in Christ has the power to sin, or, to put it positively: Christians who abide in Him have the power not to sin.[236] Yet this is an idea that the reader must import into the verse. While it is true that Christians who abide in Christ have the power not to sin, this does not seem to be what John meant here. He seemed to link abiding and not sinning in a more direct cause and effect relationship.

It seems to me that those who say that this verse means that true believers will not practice sin habitually are either naive or have very little appreciation of the depth of human depravity. Any sensitive Christian who is honestly trying to live a holy life will admit that he or she sins repeatedly every day. Every Christian is guilty of sins of omission, of motivation, and of ignorance, as well as deliberate sins.

Genuine Christians have even confessed to habitually practicing gross sins for extended periods of time. Every Christian is a habitual sinner, and we will be until the Lord takes us to glory. Obviously this does not mean that we should resign ourselves to sinning (cf. 2:1; Rom. 6:1). We should wage war against it (cf. Eph. 6:10-18). But we will never be completely free from its degrading influence in this life.

Verse 4 sets forth the essential character of sin, verse 5 relates it to the person and work of Christ, and verse 6 relates it to the whole human race.

3:7-8          Evidently the false teachers were in danger of deceiving John's readers by telling them the opposite of what the Apostle John taught here. John's point was two-pronged: conduct manifests spiritual relationship (cf. 2:29), and God hates sin (cf. v. 5). A sinner's sinning has its source in "the devil," not that he is its immediate source but its ultimate source.

"By saying that the person who is a determined sinner (in the sense suggested by v 6) 'belongs to the devil,' John is in the first place drawing on the background of Gen 3 (1-15), where the power of evil is represented as a serpent who tempts the woman (and, through her, the man) to disobey God (the reference to Cain and Abel in v 12 confirms the suggestion that this section of the OT is in mind here)."[237]

"John does not, however, say, 'born of the devil. [sic]' as he does 'born of God,' for 'the devil begets none, nor does he create any; but whoever imitates the devil becomes a child of the devil by imitating him, not by proper birth' [Augustine, Tract, 4. 10]."[238]

Obviously John did not mean that by sinning a person demonstrates that he or she is unsaved, since he earlier wrote that Christians sin (1:7-10).

3:9             Many English translations interpret the Greek present tense as saying that no Christian habitually or continually sins ("practices sin"), as in verse 6. However the Greek present tense does not always indicate habitual action, as pointed out above.[239] Frequently it describes absolute action. The New King James Version takes the Greek present tense this way and renders the clause: "Whoever had been born of God does not sin." The NET2 Bible is inconsistent: It translates verse 6, "does not sin," but verse 9, "does not practice sin." Since earlier John wrote that the Christian does sin habitually (1:6-10; cf. 2:1), the idea that the Christian does not sin habitually is unacceptable.[240]

"… the 'tense solution' in 1 John 3:9 is in the process of imploding in the current literature. It was shrewdly questioned by C. H. Dodd in his commentary in 1946 and dealt a major blow by S. Kubo in an article entitled, "1 John 3:9: Absolute or Habitual?" published in 1969.[241] It has since been given up by the three major critical commentaries published since Kubo's article; namely, I. Howard Marshall (1978), Raymond E. Brown (1982); and Stephen S. Smalley (1984). It seems quite clear that the 'tense solution' as applied to 1 John 3:9 is an idea whose time has come—and gone!"[242]

The reason that "no one who has been born of God" does not sin is that he has been born of God. John could say the Christian is sinless in this sense: because a sinless Parent has begotten the Christian. The Christian becomes a partaker of God's divine sinless nature when he or she experiences the new birth. The Christian sins because he also has a sinful human nature. However, in this verse, John was looking only at the sinless nature of the indwelling "God" that we possess. Jesus told Nicodemus that people need to experience a second birth (John 3:5-7). Every Christian has been born twice, once physically and once spiritually. John was looking at the consequence of our second birth in 1 John 3:9.

"As a total person, we do sin and can never claim to be free of it, but our 'inward self' that is regenerated does not sin."[243]

"Sin does exist in the Christian, but it is foreign and extraneous to his regenerated inner self, where Christ dwells in perfect holiness. Put into Johannine terms, since Christ is eternal life (1John 5:20), the one who possesses that life cannot sin because he is born of God."[244]

"A child of God is given a new nature, and that new nature does not and will not commit sin. The reason that the Prodigal Son could not stay in the pigpen is that he was not a pig. He was a son of the Father, and he longed for the Father's house."[245]

"The germ of the divine life has been implanted in our souls, and it grows—a gradual process and subject to occasional retardations, yet sure, attaining at length to full fruition. The believer's lapses into sin are like the mischances of the weather which hinder the seed's growth. The growth of a living seed may be checked temporarily; if there be no growth, there is no life."[246]

The "seed" probably refers to the Holy Spirit (cf. 2:27; 3:24).[247]

Again, if we were able to abide in Christ without interruption, we would never sin (cf. v. 6). The sinless nature of Christ controls the abiding Christian, whereas the sinful human nature controls the non-abiding Christian (cf. Rom. 6:16).

"That is, sin is never the product of our abiding experience. It is never the act of the regenerate self per se. On the contrary, sin is the product of ignorance and blindness toward God [cf. 3:6b]."[248]

"To view sin as intrinsically foreign to what we are as regenerate people in Christ is to take the first step toward spiritual victory over it."[249]

"There is obviously a certain idealism in the Apostle's sweeping assertions. His dictum in verse 9 applies in its absolute truth to the 'perfect man' in Christ Jesus."[250]

John was saying that when a Christian abides in God, he will behave as his heavenly Father, and others will recognize that he is a child of God.[251]

"If someone says, 'A priest cannot commit fornication,' one cannot deny that as a man he can commit it; but priests, functioning as priests, do not do those things. The Bible uses language in a similar way, 'A good tree cannot produce bad fruit' (Mt. 7:18). Of course a good tree can produce bad fruit, but not as a result of what it really is, a good tree. Also Jesus said, men 'cannot' fast while the bride groom is with them (Mk. 2:19). They can fast, but to do so is incongruous and unnatural."[252]

"Similar notions are found in Pauline thought. Paul says, 'I have been crucified with Christ; and it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and delivered Himself up for me' (Gal. 2:20). If a Christian sins, his sin cannot be expression [sic] of who he really is, because his true life is that of Christ in him [cf. Rom. 7:20-25]."[253]

"… when a Christian sins (and John believes he can and will, 1 Jn. 2:1), in that act he is behaving like a child of Satan. Who he really is is not being made evident. To use Paul's phrase, he is walking like a 'mere man' (1 Cor. 3:3)."[254]

"… no sin ever committed by a regenerate child of God has come from the new person inside who has been born of God. Instead every sin a regenerate person commits comes from his or her old sin nature."[255]

A different explanation, and one that is commonly held, though it is inconsistent with both what John wrote earlier (1:6-10; 2:1) and with experience, is the following.

"Only the unconverted and the counterfeit will practice a self-seeking, self-asserting life of sin."[256]

Note the chiastic structure of verse 9. Verses 6 and 9 also form an inclusio.

"A     No one who abides in Him sins (6a)

B       Everyone who sins … (v. 6b)

A       The one who acts righteously (v. 7)

B       The one who commits sin (v. 8)

A       No one who is born of God sins (v. 9)." [257]

John laid out five reasons why his readers should not sin: (1) because they needed to be ready to meet the Lord (v. 3); (2) because sin is illegal (v. 4); (3) because it is unchristian (vv. 5-7); (4) because it is diabolical (v. 8); and (5) because it is unnatural in a child of God (v. 9).[258]

3:10a          The absence or presence of sin in the believer's life gives evidence of his or her relationship to both God and Satan. It shows under whose authority we are living at any particular time in our lives. John divided the world into two classes: those whose parentage is either divine or diabolical. Those who are "of the devil," either saved or unsaved, do the devil's work by opposing the truth (cf. Matt. 13:38; 16:23; John 8:44; Acts 13:10; 2 John 9). One form of opposing the truth is disregarding it. Saved people are "of the devil" in the sense that sometimes they follow the devil's leading and do his work, though they no longer belong to the devil. An example of those who are "of the devil" is the antichrists (plural) that John previously warned about (2:22-23). Jesus called the unbelieving Jews the children of "your father the devil" (John 8:44).

"The key word here is 'manifest.' A sinning Christian conceals his true character when he sins and reveals it only through holiness. On the other hand, a child of Satan reveals his true character by sin."[259]

Christians can and do identify other Christians by their righteous behavior. This is not the same as saying that every true Christian without exception will produce good works (cf. John 15:1-8). Christians who are abiding in God will produce good works, and others can identify them as Christians by their "obvious" godly behavior. The sinless behavior produced and made apparent is a manifestation of God's love (v. 1). John was not suggesting that our behavior is a test of our salvation. His only test of salvation was faith in Jesus Christ (5:1, 9-13). He was talking here about how God's children manifest themselves and are perceived by others as such.

The first part of verse 10 concludes the preceding discussion about manifestation ("are obvious"). Verse 10 is another Janus verse (cf. 2:28): one that looks in two directions, backward and forward.

C.     Learning to Recognize Christian Love 3:10b-23

John has made clear that a Christian can be identified as such is by his or her righteous behavior. Christians are not identified by the absence of sin in them. John never said this. The next question that John proceeded to respond to is: How can we identify 'righteousness'? John's response was: It is not seen in morality—unbelievers can be moral—but in brotherly love. In this section, as in the one preceding it and in the one following it, the theme, brotherly love, opens and closes the section, forming another inclusio.

1.     What Love Is Not 3:10b-15

John began this part of his epistle by explaining what love is not.

3:10b         The absence of righteous behavior in a life indicates the absence of intimacy with God. Such a person is not manifesting the life of God but the life of the devil. Likewise the absence of "love" for one's "brother and sister" Christian shows that the individual who does not love has little fellowship with God. Love is the most important particular manifestation of righteous behavior (John 13:34-35; cf. Matt. 22:37-39). John proceeded to discuss this trait more fully.

"The whole aim of the Gospel is the creation and strengthening of love.[260]

"The NIV rendering here, 'Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God,' is a classic example of theologically motivated translation run amuck. It not only paraphrases the text but misinterprets it at the same time! There is nothing in this text about not being a child of God. How could there be? One must be a child of God before one could hate his brother. An unsaved man has no Christian brother to hate …"[261]

The unloving Christian is not "of God" in the sense that God is not animating what he is doing. This believer is not on God's side. He is doing the devil's work rather than God's work.

3:11           "The message" that John and his faithful followers had heard "from the beginning" was Jesus' command to His disciples "to love one another" as He had loved them (John 13:34-35; 15:12).

3:12           Cain's murder of "his brother" Abel evidenced control by Satan ("of the evil one") rather than control by God. As "of God" in verse 10 describes God as an animating force, and not as an indication of a saving relationship with God, so "of the evil one" in this verse describes Satan as an animating force. Cain was envious because of Abel's righteousness, and this motivated him to kill his brother (Gen. 4:3-8; cf. John 8:40, 42, 44).

"Let me give you a definition of envy: 'discontent or uneasiness at the sight of another's excellence or good fortune, accompanied with some degree of hatred and a desire to possess equal advantages.'"[262]

Often our pride tempts us to dislike those who are more righteous than we are, because they make us feel guilty by comparison. This is the only Old Testament reference in John's epistles, and the only proper name, except for names of God, in 1 John. Love and hatred are typical expressions of righteousness and sin, respectively.[263]

"When differences arise within a community, hard feelings can be the result."[264]

Saying that Cain was unsaved, and therefore an unsaved person must be in view here, will not work. The Bible does not say that Cain was unsaved. Furthermore, Christians have committed murder, as Cain did (cf. 1 Pet. 4:15). Christians are capable of any and every type of gross sin. It should be obvious that a true believer can hate his brother or sister Christian.

3:13           If we as Christians feel or demonstrate loving concern for one another, it should not surprise us if unrighteous people hate us for behaving more righteously than they do. Apparently John's first readers could not understand why the world hated them, because he wrote, "Do not be surprised." Christians are to the world what Abel was to Cain, namely, more righteous than they are, so we should not be surprised if the world hates us. Sometimes unbelievers who become angry with us, for example, are reacting more against God in us than against us personally.

"Of central importance for victory when a Christian is subjected to the world's hatred is the recognition that hatred is the natural response of the sinful world toward righteousness."[265]

"The author does not say that the world always hates believers. It did not always hate Jesus. But whenever the community of faith acts so as to expose the greed, the avarice, the hatred, and the wickedness of the world, it must expect rejection; and if it should go so far as to interfere with its evil practices, as Jesus did in the temple, it may expect suffering and brutal death (cf. John 15:18-19, 25; 17:14)."[266]

3:14           "Love" for other Christians shows the presence of the new (eternal) life of Christ in us. Love is a secondary ground for assurance that we have that life, after the promises of God (cf. 5:13). "Death" and "life" are two vastly different spheres of existence. The contrast shows the great change that has taken place in the believer's life as a result of being born again. "The one who does not love" at all is the person who is abiding in death rather than in eternal life. Obviously some unbelievers are very loving, but their behavior is contrary to their nature. John made the case extreme to make his point clear. His contrasts are death and life; hatred and love; darkness and light.

3:15           "Everyone" includes Christians. Murder is the ultimate outward expression of hatred (cf. Matt. 5:21-22). The key to the statement that concludes this verse is the phrase "remaining [abiding] in him." John evidently meant that no Christian whose eternal life (i.e., Jesus Christ; 1:2) has control of him and is walking in fellowship with God will commit murder. Some believers have committed murder, but they were not abiding believers when they did so (cf. John 15:4). The NIV paraphrase "no murderer has eternal life in him" is misleading because it implies that believers cannot commit murder.

2.     What Love Is 3:16-18

If hatred of a brother Christian is the antithesis of love, what does true Christian love look like? John proceeded to explain.

3:16           In contrast to the murderer Cain's act, we see love in Jesus Christ's laying down "His life for us" (cf. John 10:11). This is the opposite of taking another person's life, which Cain did. Jesus Christ laid down His life once, but we ought to lay down our lives "for the brothers and sisters" repeatedly in self-sacrificing love, as the tenses of the Greek verbs suggest.

"Most people associate Christianity with the command to love, and so they think that they know all about Christianity when they have understood its teaching in terms of their own concept of love. John found it necessary to explain clearly to his readers what he meant by love."[267]

"It is easy to 'lay down one's life': martyrdom is heroic and exhilarating; the difficulty lies in doing the little things, facing day by day the petty sacrifices and self-denials which no one notices and no one applauds."[268]

"Love means readiness to do anything for other people."[269]

3:17           We may not have the opportunity to save a brother's life by dying in his place. Nevertheless, we can and should do the next best thing, namely, sustain his life when he has material needs. When I give to a brother or sister in need what might keep me alive, I have followed the Lord Jesus' example of self-sacrificing love.

"Our love for God is manifested by obedience, but our love for other Christians is manifested by sacrifice."[270]

3:18           The evidence of genuine love is not verbal professions but vital performances: concrete acts rather than empty words (cf. 1 Cor. 13:1; James 2:15-16).

"The major concern of this passage is to encourage obedient and active love from all those who claimed allegiance to the Johannine church."[271]

3.     What Love Does for Believers 3:19-23

The practice of such self-sacrificing love for the brethren can give us boldness in God's presence now, as we pray, and in the future, when we stand before Him at His judgment seat.

3:19-20      "By this" refers to what John said in verses 17 and 18. Tangible demonstrations of love for the brethren show the believer's true character: his or her righteousness. These acts of love should be a comfort to us when we feel guilty that we have not met more needs, which is a condition that we can feel no matter how generous we may be.[272]

"Assurance is designed to be the ordinary experience and privilege of the believer."[273]

The Greek word peitho, translated "set … at ease," can also mean "to quiet."[274] The meaning is that by demonstrating love (vv. 17-18) we both gain assurance that we are walking in the truth, and we quiet our hearts when they accuse us of being guilty for not doing more.

We can overcome feelings of false guilt ("if our heart condemns us") by remembering that God, who "is greater than our [guilty] heart," "knows" our real motives ("all things"). He does not judge on the basis of appearance, like we may judge and condemn ourselves.

"This phrase ["before Him," v. 19] could refer to standing in the presence of God on the day of judgment (4:17), an occasion which might well fill the heart of a man with foreboding. But the context here is one of prayer: dare we approach God with our requests if we feel guilty before him? On the whole, it seems more likely that this is what is in John's mind (cf. 1 Thess. 1:3; 3:9[-10]). We then have a smooth transition to verse 21."[275]

3:21-22      True love for the brethren, demonstrated in deeds of self-sacrifice, enables the believer to face Jesus Christ unashamedly and with confidence, whenever He may appear (cf. 2:28). John here stressed again the importance of a clear conscience (cf. 1:7; 2:2; Heb. 9:9, 14; 10:2, 22; 1 Tim. 1:19). Shamelessness (a clear conscience) can give us an appropriate boldness ("confidence") to approach God's throne of grace in prayer even now (cf. John 8:28-29). We will receive our requests ("whatever we ask we receive from Him") if such is the will of God. John did not state this condition here, but he mentioned it later (5:14-15).

"There is nothing mechanical or magical about prayer. For it to be effective, the will of the intercessor needs to be in line with the will of God; and such a conformity of wills is brought about only as the believer lives in Christ."[276]

"Obedience is the first condition for answered prayer, when that prayer is offered by a child of God. The second, related condition is willing service: the determination to 'do' always (poioumen, present) what pleases God."[277]

3:23           Jesus taught the apostles to trust in Him and to love each other (John 14:1; 13:34; 15:12, 17). This is the distillation of His teaching. Specifically He taught them to trust in the effective power of His name when they prayed to His Father (John 14:12-15; 16:24). This is an added ground for confidence in prayer.

"There are frequent points of contact between this Epistle and the words of Jesus in John 13 to 17."[278]

"Believe" in this verse probably refers to believing for eternal salvation, rather than believing after we are Christians. The tense of the Greek verb (aorist) points to this, as does the object of belief, namely, "the name of His Son Jesus Christ."

"To believe in the name of Jesus Christ is to accept Jesus Christ for what He really is."[279]

"The Christian who hates his brother acts utterly out of touch with God, exemplifies the murderous spirit of Cain, and is 'abiding' in the sphere of death (verses 10b-15). By contrast, the loving Christian takes Christ's own self-sacrificing love as the model by which he himself should love in actual deeds and in accord with the truth (verses 16-18). If he does so, he can quiet a guilt-ridden heart, achieve a superb confidence before God in prayer, and expect answers to his prayers precisely because he is pleasing God (verses 19-23)."[280]

D.     Learning to Recognize the God of Love 3:24—4:16

Another inclusio helps us to identify the theme of this section: God's abiding in believers (3:24; 4:16). God abiding in us, as well as our abiding in Him, are essential to our having confidence as we anticipate the judgment seat of Christ (2:28; 4:17-18). Having confidence as we anticipate the judgment seat of Christ is the subject of the main part of this epistle (2:28—4:19).

1.     God's Indwelling Affirmed 3:24

Obedience results in mutual abiding: God in man and man in God. God abides ("remains") in every obedient believer with His presence, fellowship, power, and blessing (cf. John 15:10-11, 14), but He indwells (lives in) every believer (cf. Rom. 8:9; 1 Cor. 12:13). The evidence that God abides in us is the manifestation of His Spirit in and through us. This is the first explicit reference to the Holy Spirit in 1 John.

"Thus, the sentence is a definition of abiding. To abide is to keep his commandments."[281]

2.     God's Spirit Recognized 4:1-6

The mention of the Holy Spirit in 3:24 caused John to pause briefly to sound a warning. God's Spirit is not the only spirit manifested in the world. Some people naively think that any manifestation of a spiritual presence has to be an indication of the Holy Spirit. The apostle explained how to distinguish the Holy Spirit from other spirits that are at work in the world.

"In chapter 3 we studied the contrast between two families, the children of God and the children of the devil. Here we find a contrast between two spirits, the spirit of Christ and the spirit of antichrist."[282]

4:1             "Do not believe" has the force of "Stop believing" in the Greek text (pisteuete). Evidently some of his first readers were believing false teaching.

"Credulity means gullibility and some believers fall easy victims to the latest fads in spiritualistic humbuggery."[283]

It is necessary to distinguish the Spirit of God from false spirits (i.e., spirits that advocate falsehood), "because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (cf. 2:18-27).[284] False spirits (utterances or persons inspired by a spirit opposed to Christ) produce false teaching. John was speaking here of the "false prophets" as the mouthpieces of "the spirits" that inspired them, not as the foretellers of future things.[285]

"To 'test the spirits' is to make a choice from among competing claims."[286]

4:2-3          John's "test" question whereby one can determine whether "the Spirit of God" or "the spirit of the antichrist" possesses a person was this: What does the person believe about "Jesus Christ"? If a person denies the incarnation of Jesus Christ (that He "has come in the flesh")—which was a heresy that false teachers were promoting among John's original readers—he has "the spirit of the antichrist" (cf. 2:18-27). That is, a denial of the doctrine of Christ as the apostles taught it, deviation from orthodox Christology, evidences a spirit opposed to Jesus Christ.

"We are so accustomed by modern thought to regard evil as 'error', as the 'growing pains' of civilization, or simply as an inexplicable problem, that … the mind does not readily accept what is in effect God's own explanation—that there is a spirit of evil operating in the world."[287]

"The test of the presence of the Divine Spirit is the confession of the Incarnation, or, more exactly, of the Incarnate Saviour. The Gospel centres in a Person and not in any truth, even the greatest, about the Person."[288]

Notice that John did not say that we can tell false spirits by their works. He said that we can identify that they are false spirits by their words. This was the acid test of a false prophet under the Old Covenant as well (Deut. 13:1-5).

"According to the Lord Jesus, false prophets were to be tested 'by their fruits' (cf. Matthew 7:16-20). Contrary to popular interpretation, this does not mean that they were to be tested by their works. On the contrary, as Matthew 12:33-37 proves, their fruits are their words! Indeed, as the Lord Himself said, they 'come to you in sheep's clothing' so that they look like sheep when in reality they are 'ravenous wolves' (Matthew 7:15). Their behavior does not set them apart from the sheep, but their message does!"[289]

John did not say every spirit that "denies" Jesus, but every spirit that "does not confess" Jesus. Often heretical teaching masks its deviations from the truth by simply failing to affirm important biblical truth. Rather than proclaiming that Jesus is not the Christ, they fail to affirm that He is the Christ.

John had previously written "you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have appeared" in 2:18. He repeated that for emphasis here but wrote "the spirit of antichrist, which you have heard is coming, and now it is already in the world." John wanted to emphasize this warning by repeating it.

4:4             John's readers had so far "overcome" these opponents of Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit who indwelt them ("He who is in you;" cf. 3:24; 4:2, 13). The Holy Spirit is stronger ("greater") than Satan ("he who is in the world"). We overcome Satan, his agents, and his influence as we resist his temptations to doubt, deny, disregard, and disobey the Word of God (1 Pet. 5:9; cf. Gen. 3; Matt. 4).

"You are from God" is the center of a chiasm that embraces verses 2 through 6.[290] The center of a chiasm is usually its emphatic point, and that appears to be true of this chiasm.

4:5             The antichrists' teachings have an appeal to worldly minds because they come "from the world" and share the viewpoint of the world (cf. John 3:31). Heterodoxy has a greater appeal than orthodoxy because many religious movements are composed mainly of unsaved people who find false doctrine appealing.

"I do not care whether several thousand people come to your church—that is not the important thing. I am interested in the message. Is the Word of God being given out? Is it given out in the power of the Spirit so that the Spirit of God can take it and use it?"[291]

"How can a man whose watchword is competition even begin to understand an ethic whose key-note is service?"[292]

"The term 'world' (kosmos) is probably to be understood in two ways: as a system of thought antithetical to Christian belief and as a description of those members of the community who were led astray by the false teachers. That some members of the community were easily persuaded to forsake the truth of the gospel should not bewilder the faithful."[293]

"The word 'world' has several nuances of meaning; in verse 3 it means more the area inhabited by men, but in verse 4 it refers rather to sinful mankind, while in verse 5 the stress is more on the sinful principle found in such people"[294]

4:6             "We" and "us" probably refer to the apostolic eyewitnesses, as in 1:1 through 4, but it probably also includes all the faithful. The believer who "knows God" intimately responds positively to the teaching of the apostles ("listens to us"). The antichrist who "is not from God does not listen to us [apostles]."

"God did not give us the Bible merely to teach us something, but to make us something."[295]

By comparing teachings with apostolic doctrine (contained in the Bible) we can determine ("know") whether any teaching is "truth" or "error," namely, having its source in the Holy Spirit or Satan, who is the motivating spirit of the world. The way to distinguish truth from error is to compare the teaching with what the Scriptures teach. John is here comparing one set of teachers with another.[296]

"When people confess that Jesus came in the flesh, when they hear God speak to them in the gospel of his Son and are obedient to it, then the 'Spirit of truth' has been present and active. When people deny the gospel, when they will not hear it as God's Word and will not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh, then 'the spirit of falsehood' has been at work."[297]

"Since John issues warnings to his readers against being taken in by the false teachers (2:24; 2 Jn. 7-11), he appears to have reckoned with the possibility of true believers going astray."[298]

"The Apostle is giving a test to distinguish, not the children of God from those who are not children of God, but the spirit of truth from the spirit of error, as is clear from the words following. And this he does by saying that in the case of the teachers of the truth, they are heard and received by those who apprehend God, but refused by those who are not of God."[299]

3.     God's Indwelling Recognized 4:7-16

John now left behind his warning about "the spirit of error" that his readers might mistake as the Holy Spirit, namely, spirits that lure believers onto worldly paths. He returned to one of his central themes: love for the brethren. As 1 Corinthians 13 contains Paul's great statement on God's love, so 1 John 4:7 through 16 contains John's.

"All St John's arguments lead to one conclusion, all his appeals have one intent: 'Beloved, let us love one another.'"[300]

"… the present section spells out precisely the nature of the love which is demanded from every believer, and may thus be viewed as an extension of the teaching contained in 2:3-11 and 3:10-24. Earlier, John has related the love command to the 'real light' which is already shining (2:8, 10), and to the 'eternal life' of which love is the evidence (3:14-15). Now he relates the requirement of Christian love to the very nature of God himself. We are to love as a response to God's own love, and to his loving activity in Christ and in the Church."[301]

This pericope contains a comprehensive treatment of the nature of true love.

"There is considerable pastoral wisdom in John's summons to mutual love immediately after a warning to be on the alert against deceiving spirits. He knows he must anticipate possibly deleterious [harmful] effects of his own counsel as readers take it to heart."[302]

The source of love 4:7-10

4:7             "Love" as well as faith (i.e., acknowledging the true doctrine of Christ, vv. 1-6) is a product of God's Spirit ("is from God"). The believer (one "born of God") who also "knows God" (i.e., has intimate fellowship with Him) "loves" (cf. 2:3-5). "Us" and "we" in this verse and the following verses (vv. 8-14) again refer to the readers along with the apostles (cf. v. 6).

"The love which the New Testament enjoins involves a consuming passion for the well-being of others, and this love has its wellspring in God."[303]

"A little boy, upon returning from his first day in kindergarten, was asked by his mother what he learned. His reply was, 'We learned to play with kids we don't like.' Probably this is one of the most significant lessons this child will ever learn. … Would it not be advisable for some of our believers to return to kindergarten! They have not yet learned this invaluable lesson of how to love those they don't like."[304]

This verse is a concise summary of the argument of this whole epistle.

4:8             Absence of love shows that a person "who does not love does not know [have intimate fellowship with] God." It does not necessarily show that he was never born of God. Because God is light, those who abide in Him walk in His light (1:5, 7). Because God is righteous, those who abide in Him practice righteousness (2:29). Just so, "God is love," and those who abide in Him manifest His loving character. God is also spirit (John 4:24) and fire (Heb. 12:29). These are all metaphors that help us to appreciate certain characteristics of God.

"In asserting that 'God is love,' the Apostle does not mean that He is love and nothing more; this attribute does not make up the sum of the Infinite …"[305]

"All His activity is loving activity. If He creates, He creates in love; if He rules, He rules in love; if He judges, He judges in love. All that He does is the expression of His nature, is—to love."[306]

"'God is love' is rightly recognized as one of the high peaks of divine revelation in this Epistle. Logically the statement stands parallel with 'God is light' (1:5) and 'God is spirit' (Jn. 4:24) as one of the three great Johannine expressions of the nature of God. … 'God is spirit' describes his metaphysical nature, while 'God is light' and 'God is love' deal with his character, especially as he has revealed himself to men."[307]

"The absence of the article (God is the love) indicates that love is not simply a quality which God possesses, but love is that which he is by his very nature. Further, because God is love, love which he shows is occasioned by himself only and not by any outside cause. The word God is preceded by an article, which means that the statement is not reversible; it cannot read, 'Love is God.'"[308]

"John does not say that love is God, but only that God is love."[309]

4:9             The proof of God's "love" for people is that "He sent His only [Gr. monogene] Son" in order to provide eternal life for us (cf. John 1:14, 18; 3:16).[310] "Was revealed in us [Gr. ephanerothe … en hemin]" makes better sense if interpreted "was revealed among us." I take it that "so that we might live through Him" includes both the fullness of life now (cf. John 10:10) and eternal life forever. If we ever doubt God's love for us, we need to meditate on this great verse.

4:10           God's love for us was not a response to man's love for God. God took the initiative in reaching out to us. Jesus Christ became "an atoning sacrifice" (NIV), "the propitiation for our sins."

The inspiration of love 4:11-16

4:11           God's demonstration of love is our motivation and model for showing love to others. As God manifested love among us then, by sending Jesus Christ, so He manifests His love among us now as we love one another (vv. 12-13).

"Since no one in all humanity is beyond the reach of our Savior's sacrificial death, no brother or sister should be beyond our sacrificial love."[311]

4:12           "No one has ever seen God" in His pure essence without some kind of filter (cf. John 1:18). Instances in which the biblical writers said that people saw God were theophanies: manifestations of God in human or angelic form (e.g., Gen. 18:1-22; Exod. 33:18-23; et al.).[312] The incarnation of Christ was likewise a manifestation of God veiled in flesh (John 1:14).

Whenever Christians love one another we make it possible for God to abide ("God remains") in close fellowship with us. Furthermore, God's love reaches a fullness and depth ("is perfected") in us that is possible only when "we love one another." It attains its full strength then.

There are three stages of God's love in 1 John. These stages are: love manifested to the world (4:9), love given to the family of God (3:1), and love perfected in a smaller group within this family (i.e., those who abide in God, 4:12). The love of God does not reach perfection until it finds objects of love beyond itself. When it does, God, whom no one has seen, will be apparent in this demonstration of love.

"God's love for us is perfected only when it is reproduced in us or (as it may mean) 'among us' in the Christian fellowship."[313]

The same phenomenon occurs in human families. When a child says or does something just like one of his or her parents, we see the parent in the child's behavior (cf. 3:9).

"The love of God displayed in His people is the strongest apologetic [defense] that God has in the world."[314]

John insisted that Christians need to love their brethren. One reason for this emphasis was undoubtedly his pastoral concern for the welfare of his readers—that they love one another rather than hating one another. Another was that, as believers love one another, we make the invisible God visible to the world.

4:13           A believer's abiding in God and God's abiding in him or her become evident by the demonstration of love that comes from "His Spirit." The Holy Spirit is the source of the abiding believer's love, just as He is the source of our obedience (cf. 3:23-24).

"Him [God] we cannot see: has He given us any testimony of His presence in us? He has given us such a testimony, in making us partakers of His Holy Spirit."[315]

4:14           John and his fellow apostles had "seen" (as eyewitnesses of Jesus' life and ministry), and they bore witness ("testify"), "that the Father has sent the Son to be the Savior of the world." This is the gospel message in a nutshell.

Most of John's readers had not, and all of us modern readers have not, seen Jesus Christ in the flesh as the apostles did. However we can see God too, and can bear witness with the apostles, that God sent Jesus Christ into the world "to be the Savior." We can share the apostles' experience, which John said was his goal in writing this epistle (1:3-4). We can see God, both in the manifestation of His love, and in God's life behind that love, as we observe Christians loving one another. This verse then is a high point in John's argument.

This is the only place in John's epistles where he used the term "Savior" (Gr. sotera). It also appears only once in his Gospel (John 4:42).

"The Church has no more effective way to testify to the world about the Saviorhood of Jesus than by the re-display of the Savior's love in the fellowship of His disciples."[316]

"No verse in 1 John is more critical to understanding the epistle than this one."[317]

4:15           If a person "confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God remains [abides] in him, and he in God." Confessing "that Jesus is the Son of God" is necessary if one wants to have an intimate relationship with God. Confessing Christ is another step on the path to intimacy with God, the step of bearing witness ("testify," v. 14; cf. 1:9; 2:23; 4:3; Rom. 10:9-10).

"The notion of God 'abiding' in someone has rich associations with John's Gospel, where meno occurs more than three dozen times. The word can mean simply to dwell somewhere; one's domicile is where one 'abides' (John 1:38, 39a; 2:12; 4:40 [2x]; 7:9; 8:35 [2x]; 10:40; 11:6, 54). But there is a fuller sense. God's Spirit descended and 'remained' on Jesus, according to John the Baptist (1:32, 33). The Spirit was Jesus's constant companion. To 'remain' or 'abide' in Jesus's teaching is to be his true disciple (8:31). A disciple will be informed and steered by all that Jesus commanded and taught. God the Father 'remained' or 'abode' with Jesus during his earthly days (14:10). The Father was the source of the very words he spoke, and Jesus 'remained' continually in the Father's love (15:10b). 'Abiding' describes a reality involving Father, Son, and Spirit."[318]

4:16           This verse summarizes this section of the book (3:24—4:16; cf. John 6:69). John was speaking of intimate knowledge ("come to know") and intimate fellowship ("remains"). "We" probably includes the readers with the apostles. "For us" should be "among (or in) us," as in verse 9. Another condition for intimacy with God is remaining "in love."

"No body of believers will really be any stronger than the extent to which they manifest God's love by loving one another."[319]

"The stages in John's thought at this point have now emerged clearly. Faith (acknowledging Jesus as God's Son, v 15; and trusting in the love which God has for us, v 16a) leads to mutual indwelling between God and the believer. Such a personal relationship is consequently expressed in and perpetuated by 'living in love' (v 16b). The believer's love, for God and for other people (or for God in other people, cf. v 12), is to be active and sustained."[320]

John's point was that his readers had personally seen God in a sense similar to how the apostles had seen Him. The apostles had seen God in that they had seen Him in His Son, Jesus Christ, during His earthly ministry. God had revealed His love to the apostles through Jesus Christ. The readers had seen God in that they had seen Him in His Spirit-indwelt abiding believers who loved one another and confessed Christ publicly. Consequently John's readers could bear witness to the truth as the apostles did, and they could enjoy the same intimate fellowship with God that the apostles did.

"Too much 'witnessing' today is a mere mouthing of words. People need an [audio and visual] expression of love."[321]

E.     Having Boldness at Christ's Judgment Seat 4:17-19

John drew a conclusion from what he had written about the importance of believers abiding in God. It is the conclusion that he introduced in the theme verse of the body of the epistle: "Now, little children, remain in Him, so that when He appears, we may have confidence and not draw back from Him in shame at His coming" (2:28).

"How can a believer know that his love for the Father is being perfected? This paragraph of 1 John [4:17—5:5] suggests four evidences [namely, confidence (4:17-19), honesty (4:20-21), joyful obedience (5:1-3), and victory (5:4-5)]."[322]

4:17           "By this" refers back to our mutual abiding (v. 16). Our love becomes complete ("is perfected") by our mutual abiding. Consequently we can now "have confidence" as we anticipate our "day of judgment" (i.e., the evaluation of our works at Christ's judgment seat; 1 Cor. 3:12-15; 2 Cor. 5:10; Rom. 14:10-12). The characteristic of God and Christians ("as He is, we also are in this world") in view here is our love. Christians do not need to fear the judgment seat of Christ if we have demonstrated love to others. By loving God and others we demonstrate our likeness to Jesus Christ, who is our righteous Judge. Therefore to give love is to gain boldness ("confidence," Gr. parresian).

Here John said that God's love reaches perfection "with us" (Gr. meth hamon), whereas in 4:12 he wrote that His love reaches perfection "in us" (Gr. en hamin). When it reaches perfection "in us," a proper relationship to other people exists, namely, no hate. When it reaches perfection "with us," a proper relationship to God exists, namely, no fear.

As Jesus abode in His Father, and consequently had confidence in the face of trials and death, so we can abide in Christ and have confidence in spite of present trials (the world's hostility) and future death and judgment. Abiding in God gave Jesus confidence, and it gives us confidence as well.

"Jesus is in the world unseen, and our office is to make Him visible. We are to Him what He was to the Father in the days of His flesh—'Dei inaspecti aspectabilis imago' ["the visible image of the invisible God"]."[323]

4:18           When we love others we have no reason to "fear" as we anticipate the judgment seat of Christ (cf. Rom. 8:15; Heb. 2:15). If we had "perfect love" we would have "no fear." The person who loves is, of course, the person over whom God is exercising His controlling influence (i.e., an abiding Christian). A believer who does not love others feels guilty and fears (dreads) meeting his Judge, perhaps subconsciously if not consciously. This fear is a "punishment." His guilty conscience punishes him.

"Fear, by anticipating punishment, has it even now; bears about a foretaste of it and so partakes of it …"[324]

"… fear is the product of the observation that Christians have in fact not yet realized all the potential of their fellowship with God. There is still much of the unredeemed state about them."[325]

Christ's death for us frees us from the fear of condemnation at the Great White Throne judgment (Rom. 8:1). Our abiding life frees us from the fear of shame at the judgment seat of Christ (cf. 2:28).

A Christian who loves others may have other fears, but he need not fear (dread) the judgment seat of Christ. The fact that he loves others demonstrates that his relationship with God is essentially what it should be.

John was using love for God and other people here as he did elsewhere in this epistle (e.g., 2:3-11). He meant that it is the most important manifestation of a proper relationship with God, not the only manifestation. Throughout this section of his letter John used the Greek word agape ("love," i.e., doing what is best for the other person).

On the human level only total acceptance of another person will remove the fear in love. For example, in marriage a love relationship that is free of fear is one in which there is a commitment to demonstrate total acceptance of the mate. Total forgiveness is also necessary for a transparent relationship (Eph. 4:31-32).

4:19           Our ability to love, and our practice of love, both come from God's love for us ("He first loved us"). We need not fear standing before our Judge, because we love Him and He loves us. This verse is the climax of the body of this epistle.

"The ultimate ground of Christian assurance (including confidence on the judgment day, v 17) is not to be found in our loving, however 'complete' (v 18), but in God's prior love for us …"[326]

"God always makes the first move in the game of love."[327]

Someone has said that humans were made to run on love, just like cars with internal combustion engines were made to run on gasoline, and they do not function well on anything else but love.

John used various forms of the word "love" a total of 46 times in this short epistle.[328]

Confidence is one of the great consequences of having intimate fellowship with God. We can have confidence both now, and confidence to meet Jesus Christ when He returns for us or when we die (2:28). We can have confidence in prayer (3:21-22) on earth, and confidence when we stand before His judgment seat to give account of our stewardship (4:17-19).

V.     Learning how to live obediently 4:20—5:17

"John no doubt intended his letter to be read publicly to all the members of each congregation—even if the addressed readers of First John were the elders, or leaders, of the church or churches to which this letter went. This public reading would have a twofold effect. First, it would buttress the authority of the local leadership so that they could stand more effectively against the Revisionists. Since the author was an apostle, his endorsement both of their doctrine and personal qualifications (cf. 2:12-14) was vital. But second, it would make the letter a teaching vehicle to all the Christians who heard it, and later to untold millions who would read, study, and hear it preached."[329]

"Since the apostle John was unquestionably one of the greatest teachers the church has ever had, he must have known perfectly well that the level of experience he described might seem hard to some of the less mature in his audience. In the final segment of his epistle, which serves as a conclusion to all that has gone before, the writer addresses the practical concerns that his teaching on Christian experience might raise."[330]

A.     The Meaning of Brotherly Love 4:20—5:3a

John proceeded to clarify how to love our brethren. In the process, he dealt with potential excuses for not loving them.

4:20           The person who claims to love God but hates his fellow believer is "a liar." Verse 19 left open the possibility of such a claim. In John's hyperbolic language, failing to love means to "hate." Genuine love for the unseen "God" will find expression in love for our brethren whom we can see. It is easier to love someone that we can see than it is to love someone that we cannot see. Here is another false claim (cf. 1:6, 8, 10; 2:4, 6, 9, 22).

"The eye is wont to affect the heart; things unseen less catch the mind, and thereby the heart."[331]

This is the last of seven tests in this epistle.

"In the first [1:6] the religious professionalist is not honest with others. In the second [1:8] he is not honest with himself. In the third [1:10] he is not honest with God. In the fourth [2:4] he is not honest with Christ. In the fifth [2:6] he is not honest with the world. In the sixth [2:9] he is not honest with his Christian brother. In the seventh [4:20] he is by implication (ponder it and see) false to all."[332]

4:21           Furthermore, God commanded us to love both Himself and our brothers and sisters, not just Himself (2:3; 3:11, 23-24; 5:3; Lev. 19:18; Matt. 5:43-44; 22:37-40; John 13:34).

"Much verbal expression of devotion for the person of Christ can co-exist with remarkably un-Christian attitudes toward the people of Christ …"[333]

"It is easy to have a kind of love for God which does not recognize the obligation to love one another. Such love for God falls short of being real love for him, since it fails to obey his commandments."[334]

5:1             The first part of this verse is one of the clearest statements in Scripture of what a person has to do to be saved (cf. John 20:31). There is no other way that John ever defined a Christian. We must believe that "Jesus" of Nazareth "is the Christ" (i.e., the Anointed One whom God promised to provide as a substitute sacrifice for the sins of the world; cf. John 1:29). What defines a Christian is his or her faith ("believes") in Jesus Christ, not lifestyle, good works, or obedience to God.

Our brothers and sisters in the faith are those who believe that Jesus is the Christ. Even though we may have little in common with some Christians, we can still love them because we share the same Parent and are members of the same family ("has been born of God").

How can we love another Christian when we do not particularly like the person? The key is the meaning of love. Loving our brethren means doing what is best for them (Gr. agape). It does not mean feeling affection for them, though feelings of affection frequently follow a commitment to do what is best for another person. God does not require us to feel equally affectionate toward all of our brethren, but He does require us to do what is best for them—with the proper attitude.

5:2             We must love other Christians in obedience to God's "commandments." Those who genuinely love God will obey His commandments. This love expresses itself in action, not just emotion. We love other Christians best when we obey God. When we obey God we will love "the children of God," because He has commanded us to do so.

5:3a            The fundamental proof that we love God and people is obedience to the Word of God. This must include willingness to sacrifice for our brethren (cf. 3:10-17). It is very easy to test our love for God. How committed are we to being completely obedient to His will? That is the measure of our love.[335] "Love of God" here refers to our love of God (objective genitive in Greek), not the love of God for us (subjective genitive).

Love for God and God's children, in this verse, is essentially defined by obedience to God's commands. It is not so much how we feel about God and other believers as how we choose to relate to them that is crucial.

B.     The Empowerment of Brotherly Love 5:3b-15

If love for our brethren really boils down to keeping God's commandments, how can we do that? It sounds difficult, even impossible. John proceeded to respond to this concern.

5:3b           God's commands "are not burdensome" (oppressive, so as to crush love), because every believer has already exercised the faith in God that is essential for obedience (cf. Matt. 11:30; 1 John 4:4).

"The reason why God's commandments are not heavy is the power that comes with the new birth from God."[336]

5:4             Every Christian ("whoever has been born of God") "overcomes the world" by his or her initial "faith" in Jesus Christ. This is the positive side of 3:9, which says that no one who has been born of God sins. To continue to overcome the world, the flesh, and the devil, all we need to do is continue to exercise "faith" in God (cf. Rom. 8:37; 1 Cor. 15:57). Thus God's commandments are not oppressive (v. 3) because the Holy Spirit enables us to obey God.

"It is striking that John does not say 'whoever' but 'whatever' [in the AV] (Greek: to gegennemenon, neuter gender). This suggests that there is something inherently world-conquering in the very experience of being born of God. We are now immediately told what this is: 'and this is the victory that has overcome the world—our faith.'"[337]

5:5             Continuing to overcome is not automatic for the Christian. Not all Christians continue to overcome the world (cf. 2 Tim. 4:10). Only those who continue to live by "faith" (i.e., who trust and obey God day by day) do. However, no one can overcome the world unless he or she "believes that Jesus is the Son of God." It is in this sense that John refers to overcomers here; every Christian overcomes essentially because he or she believes in Jesus Christ (cf. Rom. 8:1).

5:6             The "water" in this verse probably refers to John the Baptist's baptism of Jesus in water. The "blood" probably refers to His atoning death by crucifixion.[338]

"Apparently the heretics attached a certain importance to Jesus' baptism."[339]

"John is correcting the false teacher Cerinthus, who claimed that the Spirit came on Jesus at His baptism but left Him before His death (see 4:2, 3)."[340]

Another view is that the "water" refers to the Word of God, and the "blood" refers to Christ's death.[341] A third view is that the "water" refers to the reception of divine life and moral cleansing through the Word, and the "blood" refers to judicial cleansing that gives the Christian his or her standing before God through the shed blood of Christ.[342] A fourth view is that the "water" refers to Jesus' ministry of baptism and the "blood" to His ministry of saving.[343] Still other views are that the "water" and "blood" refer to Christ's incarnation, to what flowed from Jesus' side when He was crucified, and to baptism and the Lord's Supper.

"… baptism attests to us that we have been cleansed and washed; the Eucharistic Supper, that we have been redeemed. In water, washing is represented; in blood, satisfaction. These two are found in Christ '… who,' as John says, 'came in water and blood' [I John 5:6]; that is, to wash and to redeem."[344]

Some false teachers in the early church taught that the divine Christ descended on the human Jesus at His baptism but left Him before His crucifixion, for example, Cerinthus and other Gnostics.[345] John referred to this teaching in this verse. He considered this teaching untrue. Jesus Christ, one Person, came at His first advent not just to experience baptism in water but also to die.

"The true identity of Jesus, the writer appears to be saying, is only to be discovered by looking at the whole of his life, including its end."[346]

The Holy "Spirit" is an additional witness, along with those just mentioned. He testified to the identity of Jesus as God's Son at His baptism (Matt. 3:17). Cerinthus taught that the Spirit was the divine Christ, or God's anointing, which descended on Jesus then.[347] John corrected this error by pointing out that the Spirit was a witness to Jesus' identity; He was not the Christ. John further stressed the reliability of the Spirit's witness by reminding his readers that He is "the truth." The Spirit's testimony about Jesus' identity at His baptism was true because the Spirit Himself "is truth"—and is even God Himself (cf. John 14:6; 15:26; 16:14). As God is love personified, the Spirit is truth personified.

5:7-8          Actually there are three witnesses to the truth (cf. Deut. 19:15; Matt. 18:16; John 8:17-18). These witnesses are: "the Spirit" at Jesus' baptism, and subsequently through the apostles and prophets; "the water" of Jesus' baptism; and "the blood" of His crucifixion. John personified the latter two in this verse as witnesses. "The water" of Jesus' baptism witnessed to His true humanity and His identification with humankind. "The blood" of Jesus' crucifixion witnessed to His complete obedience to His Father. The testimony of eyewitnesses and prophets, as well as that of the historical events, affirmed the divine and human character of Jesus Christ. "The three are in agreement."

"In the water and the blood we have testimony of cleansing and redemption. But the Spirit, the primary witness, makes us certain of such testimony. This lofty mystery has been admirably shown us in the cross of Christ, when water and blood flowed from his sacred side [John 19:34]."[348]

A few late manuscripts of 1 John insert other witnesses between the words "testify" (v. 7) and "the Spirit" (v. 8). Erasmus included these witnesses in his edition of the Greek New Testament, and the translators of the AV followed his example.[349] The addition (in italics to highlight) reads: "… testify in heaven—the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit—and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit "

"Not a single manuscript contains the Trinitarian addition before the fourteenth century, and the verse is never quoted in the controversies over the Trinity in the first 450 years of the church era."[350]

5:9             God gave His "testimony" "concerning His Son" at Jesus' baptism (Matt. 3:17), at His crucifixion (Matt. 27:51-53), and through His apostles (John 19:35-37). The apostles' "testimony" ultimately came from God.

5:10           Having spoken of the character of the divine testimony to Jesus (vv. 6-9), John moved on to discuss the results of that witness (vv. 10-12). The witness ("the testimony that God has given") is the truth about Jesus Christ that the indwelling Holy Spirit gives. This may be the objective witness of Scripture, or it may be the objective presence of the Spirit in the believer's heart ("the testimony in himself"). The Spirit witnesses in both ways, though I think the second explanation is preferable. If someone does not believe the Spirit's testimony, he is saying that God has lied (cf. 1:10). John clarified the implications of rejecting the gospel in stark terms.

"The writer, then, cannot allow that one can profess belief in God, as did his opponents, and yet reject God's testimony to his own Son. Such rejection cannot be excused on the basis of ignorance. The evidence is too clear and too weighty. Rather, it is deliberate unbelief, the character of which in the end impugns the very being and character of God. If Jesus is not God's own Son in the flesh, then God is no longer the truth. He is the liar."[351]

Believing "in the Son of God" is the same as believing that Jesus is the Christ (cf. v. 1; John 3:15-16, 18; 20:30-31).

"There is nothing here about 'head or heart belief,' or about a 'faith that yields to God as over against mere intellectual assent,' etc. The Bible does not complicate faith like that. Once we have understood the message, the issue is: Is it true or false? Do we believe it, or do we not?"[352]

5:11-12      The content of God's "testimony" is this: "Eternal life" is a gift from "God" and it is inseparable from the person of Jesus Christ ("His Son"). Some of the false teachers seem to have tried to separate eternal life from Christ (cf. 2:25-26). Jesus Christ and eternal life together are one gift given from God.

"'Eternal' life is qualitative, not quantitative; it is the highest kind of spiritual and moral life, irrespective of time, which God enables the believer to share in relationship with Jesus."[353]

"Some years ago, a blood specimen was taken from an African national in Lagos, West Africa. As a result, ever since, millions of people all over the world have been protected from yellow fever. All of the yellow fever vaccine produced has been derived from this original strain of virus obtained from this one African. It has given immunity to millions of people in many countries. To be saved from yellow fever, one must receive an application of the vaccine that originated from one man. To be saved from the judgment of God, one must receive an application of the unique precious blood that was shed by the Son of God alone."[354]

Verse 12 is not an offer of eternal life, such as John 20:30 and 31, but a confirmation of what God had done for the readers, as the next verse verifies.

5:13           The words "these things" evidently refer to what John had just written about God's testimony (vv. 6-12) rather than to his whole epistle. The "these things" in 1:4 refer to what was previously written in 1:1 through 3, the "these things" in 2:1, likewise, refer to what immediately precedes in 1:5 through 10, and the "these things" in 2:26 refer to what immediately precedes in 2:18 through 25.[355] John stated the purpose of the whole epistle in 1:3 and 4.[356]

"This assertion [i.e., v. 13] is very frequently, and wrongly, taken as a statement of purpose for the entire epistle. … But this is contrary to the writer's usage."[357]

Our assurance of salvation rests on the testimony of God: His promise (v. 12). It does not rest on the presence of spiritual fruit in our lives (cf. John 15:8). It rests on God's Word, not on man's works. Therefore we can be sure ("know that") we have eternal life, if we have believed on Jesus Christ.[358]

Some interpreters believe that the Christian's assurance of salvation rests on both God's objective promises in Scripture and on the subjective evidence of the believer's works.[359] The following quotation from one commentator seems to ground our assurance only on subjective evidence:

"Those who cling to the promise of eternal life but care nothing for Christ's holiness have nothing to be assured of. Such people do not really believe. Either their professed 'faith' in Christ is an utter sham, or they are simply deluded. If they did truly have their hope fixed on Christ, they would purify themselves, just as He is pure (3:3)."[360]

"Those who are willing to look at themselves with complete honesty will find more grounds to doubt their salvation than to be assured of it. Some even teach that this uncertainty is healthy! But this does not reckon with the fact that the apostle John expected his readers to know that they had eternal life. The irony is that once Christian experience is made the grounds for assurance, as some hold First John does, John's statement in this verse about knowing becomes a complete impossibility!"[361]

"But if we have eternal life, it is certainly well that we should know it; that is the normal and fitting experience of those who are in Christ."[362]

5:14-15      Prayer is another expression of the believer's trust in Jesus Christ and "confidence" before God (cf. 3:21). To do something in the name of another means to act on the authority of that person (cf. John 5:43; 10:25).

"Prayer is not a battle, but a response; its power consists in lifting our wills to God, not in trying to bring his will down to us …"[363]

"Jesus teaches us to pray: 'Thy will be done,' not, 'Thy will be changed.'"[364]

In the preceding context the subject is mainly obedience to the will of God (vv. 3b-13). John's point was that whenever we need help, but particularly help in obeying God, we can ask for it in prayer confidently (cf. 2:28; 3:21; 4:17). He conditioned the promise "whatever" (v.15) with "according to His will" (v. 14). God hears all prayers, of course, because He knows everything. However He hears them in the sense that He hears them favorably because we are His children asking for help to do His will. He will always grant that kind of request.[365]

"He always hearkens; He is not like man, often occupied so that he cannot listen, or careless so that he will not."[366]

"The fact that we as true believers and God's children will never come face to face with him and ask what is against his will is in a way self-evident; hence it is not mentioned in so many of the promises of Jesus regarding prayer nor in 3:21, 22."[367]

"We know" the most important aspects of the will of God through Scripture.

"In so far as God's will is not our will, we are not abiding in faith, and our prayers are not accepted."[368]

"But, if prayer is to be made according to God's will, why pray at all? Surely his will is going to be accomplished, whether or not we pray for it to be done? To speak in such terms is to assume that God's will must be understood in a static kind of way, as if God has made a detailed plan beforehand of all that is going to happen—including the fact that we are going to pray in a particular way and at a particular time. But while the Bible does speak of God's plan and purpose for the world, to speak in such deterministic terms is inconsistent with the freedom which the Bible itself assigns to God's children, and it wreaks havoc upon the biblical idea of the personal relationship which exists between God and his children."[369]

Trust in Jesus Christ is therefore as basic to success in living the Christian life as it is to obtaining eternal life.

C.     The Consequences of Brotherly Love 5:16-17

Although as believers in Jesus Christ we have every right and obligation to be concerned about our own obedience, we cannot truly love our brethren unless we have concern for their obedience too. Prayer according to God's will is not only a resource for us that helps us love one another, but prayer is also a resource whereby we can obtain help for our brothers and sisters in the faith and their needs.

"Join together the confidence concerning prayer just expressed, and the all-essential Christian principle of brotherly love, and we have following, as matter of course, the duty, and the practice, of intercession for an erring brother."[370]

5:16           John explained that prayer should extend to the needs of others (cf. 1 Tim. 2:1). He did this in order to clarify further what loving one's brethren involves. The general subject of this verse is prayer for a sinning Christian. We can clarify the sense of this verse, and the next one, by inserting the words "premature physical" before each instance of the word "death."

Some writers wrote that the assumed modifier of "death" should be "eternal."[371] This interpretation may result in concluding, erroneously I believe, that the brethren in view were either never saved in the first place or lost their salvation.

Other interpreters believe that "What God does when He gives life for these sinners is to strengthen their damaged, declining spiritual life …"[372] In this case it seems that the "death" would be spiritual death. But how could a "brother" Christian die spiritually (eternally)? He might get sick spiritually, but he would not die spiritually. Lenski, the writer just quoted, as an Arminian, believed that believers can lose their salvation.

I believe this verse is teaching that some sins bring God's swift judgment and result in the premature physical "death" of the sinner (e.g., Acts 5:1-11; 1 Cor. 5:5; 11:30). Other sins do not have this drastic result. "There is sin not leading to death" (v. 17). The fact that it is very difficult, if not impossible, for us today to distinguish these types of sins should not lead us to conclude that a distinction does not exist (cf. Heb. 6:4-6; 10:26-29).

"The Old Testament already recognizes a difference between lesser (unpremeditated) and greater (deliberate) sins (see Lev. 4:2ff.; 5:1ff.; Num. 15:22ff., in contrast to Num. 15:30f.). Mortal sin originally meant a sin incurring the penalty of physical death (see Num. 18:22; Isa. 22:14)."[373]

 According to the eternal death view, the sin unto death is a reference to failure to believe in Christ (cf. John 3:18-19; 8:24; 9:39).[374] Sins not leading to eternal death are those that will not result in a person's damnation, because God will give eternal life to that sinner in answer to the prayer offered by the intercessor. Sins not leading to eternal death could also refer to sins that do not irrevocably separate the believer from God, for which forgiveness is possible. It is true that failure to believe in Christ results in eternal death, but that does not seem to me to be the sin unto death that is in view in this verse.

"There are two ways of killing the soul: (1) The benumbing and hardening practice of disregarding spiritual appeals and stifling spiritual impulses … (2) A decisive apostasy, a deliberate rejection. This was the case of those heretics. They had abjured [renounced] Christ and followed Antichrist."[375]

Under the Old Mosaic Covenant sinners who abandoned that covenant died physically, because their abandonment represented a major rejection of Yahweh's authority. The writer to the Hebrews warned his readers that abandonment of the New Covenant would result in inevitable severer judgment (physical death plus some form of spiritual death, such as loss of reward for believers, or the second death for unbelievers)—with no possibility of repentance (Heb. 6:4-6; 10:26-27). Repudiation of the New Covenant involves rejecting Jesus Christ. That could be the sin leading to death that John meant here.

"The early church took much more seriously than we do the possibility that a person may sin beyond hope of redemption."[376]

In the case of sin "leading to" premature physical "death," John revealed that prayer will not avert the consequences of that sin. Therefore praying in these situations will not help. However John did not say that we should refrain from praying about these situations.[377] We do not know if a sin is one that God will judge with premature death. In such cases we can pray that God will bring His will to pass for a sinning Christian.[378]

"We are to do the praying, and God will do the sorting."[379]

Jeremiah, out of love for his brethren, continued to pray for the rebellious unbelieving Israelites, even though God told him that his prayers would not change His mind, because their doom was sealed (Jer. 7:16; 11:14; 14:11-12).

"… John's warning against sin, and the failure to maintain orthodox faith (2:24; 2 John 8-9), shows that while he expected his readers to walk in the light as sons of God (1:7; vv 18-19), he did not ignore the possibility that some believing but heretically inclined members of his community might become apostate."[380]

Many Christians have failed to realize that sin always leads to some type of dying, even among Christians (Rom. 6:23). While it is true that no Christian will ever experience the second death (eternal separation from God), we do normally experience the physical and spiritual (loss of fellowship) consequences of our sinning. The exception is Christians whom God will translate when the Lord Jesus returns for His own (1 Cor. 15:51-57; 1 Thess. 4:17).

"A further question is whether the sin that leads to death can be committed by those who are truly God's children. … A number of scholars have tried to show that this could not have been John's meaning. Thus it has been argued that the people in question had merely masqueraded as believers but had never at any point truly believed in Jesus. Consequently, the sin that leads to death is to be understood as a sin of unbelievers which believers cannot in principle commit.[381] However, this point must remain doubtful. The fact that John needed to warn his readers against the possibility of sinning and failing to continue in the truth and in the doctrine of Christ (2:24; 2 Jn. 7-11) suggests that he did not altogether exclude the possibility that a person might fall away from his faith into apostasy [cf. Heb. 6:4-6; 10:26-31]. Nevertheless, it was his clear expectation that his readers would continue in their faith without falling away from it."[382]

"I think that if a child of God goes on disgracing the Lord down here, the Lord will either set him aside or take him home by death. God doesn't mind doing that. I think He does it in many instances."[383]

5:17           When a brother or sister has committed a sin "not leading to" premature physical "death," we in the church should pray for that individual (cf. 1:9). Prayer for a sinning Christian is a concrete demonstration of love for that brother or sister (3:23).

These verses are not distinguishing between mortal (unpardonable) and venial (pardonable) sins, as Roman Catholic theology uses these terms. All sins are pardonable except the sin of refusing to accept God's gift of eternal life.

"So long as a man in his heart of hearts hates sin and hates himself for sinning, so long as he knows that he is sinning, he is never beyond repentance, and, therefore, never beyond forgiveness; but once a man begins to revel in sin, and to make sin the deliberate policy of his life, and loses all sense of the terror and the awfulness of sin and also the feeling of self-disgust, he is on the way to death, for he is on the way to a state where the idea of repentance will not, and cannot, enter his head."[384]

The following chart summarizes the two views just discussed:


Spiritual death is in view.


Physical death is in view.

The offender is a brother.

The offender is a brother.

The sin not unto death is any sin other than unbelief in Christ.

The sin not unto death is any sin that does not shorten one's life.

God will grant spiritual life to the guilty in answer to prayer. (Prayer is never a guarantee of eternal life.)

God will grant extended physical life to the guilty in answer to prayer. (God did this for King Hezekiah; cf. James 5:15.)

The sin unto death is unbelief.

The sin unto death is any serious sin that shortens physical life.

John did not commend prayer for the person who commits the sin of unbelief. (One would think that he would commend it; cf. Rom. 10:1.)

John did not commend prayer for the person who commits sin that shortens physical life. (Evidently he believed such praying would be useless; cf. Jer. 7:16.)


We should demonstrate concern about the obedience of others as well as our own obedience by praying for them. When we become truly concerned about our own obedience, we will also become concerned about the obedience of our brethren. God gives us eternal life, but we who are believers can give extended physical life to others, in some cases, when we ask God in prayer to be merciful to them.

VI.    Christian Certainties 5:18-21

John concluded this epistle by summarizing the major thoughts that he had presented in order to reinforce and review them for his readers. "We know" many things as a result of what Jesus taught and what John taught. Three of these follow.

"The writer's fundamental thought here is that if the readers perceive the truths he mentions, they will be fortified against the allurements of the idolatrous pagan practices around them."[385]

5:18           "We know" introduces this verse and the following two verses. John probably meant: We apostles know, and now you readers also know, what I have written in this epistle.

As in 3:9, John affirmed that the basic nature of one who has God for his spiritual Parent is not to sin.[386] The regenerate person as such is incapable of any sin.[387]

"That new man cannot sin because it is born of God. God is righteous, and that which is born of God cannot sin, nor can the wicked one touch that which is begotten of God."[388]

One interpretation of the second part of this verse is that because the new man in Christ possesses the sinless nature of the indwelling Christ, John could say that Christ ("one who has been born of God") keeps him from sin (cf. John 17:12; Rev. 3:10). Another better view is that "one who has been born of God" refers to the believer who keeps himself from sin.[389] Elsewhere in this epistle the phrase "born of God" refers to the believer (3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4).

In addition, Satan cannot ("the evil one does not") touch him. This does not mean that Satan cannot attack or physically hurt a spiritual and abiding Christian (cf. Job). It means that he cannot destroy the spiritual and abiding Christian in his or her faith and testimony. Evidently John restated this fundamental truth because people normally behave in harmony with what they believe themselves to be (cf. Prov. 23:7). Our behavior as Christians will be more holy when we view ourselves as children of God rather than as children of the devil (cf. 3:10).

5:19           Moreover, believers are distinct from the world system that Satan controls since we are God's children (5:9-13). We need not accept the worldly teachings of antichrists (3:7-8) nor capitulate to worldly lusts (2:15-17).

5:20           Finally, we have spiritual understanding as a result of our anointing with the Holy Spirit. Consequently we can come to "know" God intimately and can abide in God and "in His Son Jesus Christ," who is "the true God and eternal life" (cf. John 14:6). Darby considered the last part of this verse as the key to this epistle.[390] The full title "His Son Jesus Christ" appears only at 1:3 and here in this epistle, and it provides bookends for what John wrote (another inclusio). This verse contains one of the clearest announcements of the deity of Jesus Christ in the New Testament.

"Eternal life, for John, is a relationship with the Father and the Son. It begins in the present when a person comes to faith in Jesus Christ, but it continues uninterrupted into the age to come."[391]

Findlay summarized the three things that we know, in verses 18 through 20, as "the apostolic creed": "I believe in holiness." "I believe in regeneration." "I believe in the mission of the Son of God."[392]

5:21           John closed with a final admonition. Departure from the true God and His teaching constitutes idolatry. As contradicting God is the same as calling Him a liar (1:10), so departing from God amounts to idolatry.

"What is an idol? It I anything more important to you than God, anything that absorbs your heart and imagination more than God, anything you seek to give you what only God can give."[393]

Departing from God includes leaving apostolic teaching and practice, and behaving like a child of Satan rather than like a child of God.

"False teaching is ultimately 'apostasy from the true faith.' To follow after it is to become nothing better than an idol worshiper, especially if it is a matter of the truth of one's conception of God. The author is blunt. The false teachers propose not the worship of the true God, made known in his Son Jesus, but a false god—an idol they have invented."[394]

This verse is a New Testament restatement for Christians of the first commandment that God gave the Israelites in the Decalogue (Exod. 20:3-5; Deut. 5:7-9).

"High birth demands high bearing [Noblesse oblige.]"[395]


Alford, Henry. The Greek Testament. 4 vols. New ed. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co., 1883, 1881, 1880, 1884.

Allman, James E. "First John 1:9: Confession as a Test, but of What?" Bibliotheca Sacra 172:686 (April-June 2015):203-21.

_____. "hilaskesthai: To Propitiate or to Expiate?" Bibliotheca Sacra 172:687 (July-September 2015):335-55.

_____. "Suffering in the Non-Pauline Epistles." In Why, O God? Suffering and Disability in the Bible and the Church, pp. 195-205. Edited by Larry J. Waters and Roy B. Zuck. Wheaton: Crossway, 2011.

Archer, Gleason L. An Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1982.

Bailey, Mark L., and Thomas L. Constable. The New Testament Explorer. Nashville: Word Publishing Co., 1999. Reissued as Nelson's New Testament Survey. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1999.

Baker's Dictionary of Theology. Edited by Everett F. Harrison. 1960 ed. S.v. "Theophany," by Wick Broomall, pp. 520-21.

Barclay, William. The Letters of John and Jude. The Daily Study Bible series. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press, 1962.

Barker, Glenn W. "1 John." In Hebrews-Revelation. Vol. 12 of The Expositor's Bible Commentary. 12 vols. Edited by Frank E. Gaebelein and J. D. Douglas. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1981.

Baxter, J. Sidlow. Explore the Book. 1960. One vol. ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1980.

Baylis, Charles P. "The Meaning of Walking 'in the Darkness' (1 John 1:6)." Bibliotheca Sacra 149:594 (April-June 1992):214-22.

Bigalke, Ron J. "Identity of the First Epistle of John: Context, Style, and Structure." Journal of Dispensational Theology 17:50 (Spring 2013):7-44.

Blair, J. Allen. The Epistles of John: Devotional Studies on Living Confidently. Neptune, N.J.: Loizeaux Brothers, 1982.

Boice, James Montgomery. The Epistles of John. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1979.

Brindle, Wayne A. "Biblical Evidence for the Imminence of the Rapture." Bibliotheca Sacra 158:630 (April-June 2001):138-51.

Brooke, A. E. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Johannine Epistles. International Critical Commentary series. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1912.

Brown, Raymond. The Epistles of John. Anchor Bible series. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1982.

Bruce, F. F. The Epistles of John. London: Pickering & Inglis Ltd., 1970; reprint ed., Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1986.

Calvin, John. The First Epistle of John. Calvin's New Testament Commentaries series. Translated by T. H. L. Parker. Reprint ed. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1959-61.

_____. Institutes of the Christian Religion. The Library of Christian Classics series, volumes 20 and 21. Edited by John T. McNeill. Translated by Ford Lewis Battles. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1960.

Candlish, Robert S. The First Epistle of John. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, n.d.

Carson, Donald A., and Douglas J. Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005.

Chafer, Lewis Sperry. Systematic Theology. 8 vols. Dallas: Dallas Seminary Press, 1947-48.

Colson, Charles W. Loving God. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1983.

Constable, Thomas L. Talking to God: What the Bible Teaches about Prayer. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1995; reprint ed., Eugene, Oreg.: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2005.

_____. "What Prayer Will and Will Not Change." In Essays in Honor of J. Dwight Pentecost, pp. 99-113. Edited by Stanley D. Toussaint and Charles H. Dyer. Chicago: Moody Press, 1986.

Cook, W. Robert. "Harmartiological Problems in First John." Bibliotheca Sacra 123:491 (July-September 1966):249-60.

Crain, C. Readings on the First Epistle of John. New York: Loizeaux Brothers, n. d.

Darby, John Nelson. Synopsis of the Books of the Bible. 5 vols. Revised ed. New York: Loizeaux Brothers Publishers, 1942.

Deissmann, Adolf. Light from the Ancient East. 4th ed. Translated by Lionel R. M. Strachen. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1965.

Derickson, Gary W. "What Is the Message of 1 John?" Bibliotheca Sacra 150:597 (January-March 1993):89-105.

Dillow, Joseph C. The Reign of the Servant Kings. Miami Springs, Fla.: Schoettle Publishing Co., 1992.

Dodd, C. H. The Johannine Epistles. Moffatt New Testament Commentary series. New York: Harper and Row, 1946.

Eaton, Michael. No Condemnation: A New Theology of Assurance. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1995.

Ehrman, Bart D. A Brief Introduction to the New Testament. New York and Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2004.

_____. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. 3rd ed. New York and Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2000, 2004.

Eusebius. The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus. Twin Brooks series. Popular ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1974.

Findlay, George G. Fellowship in the Life Eternal. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1909.

Fruchtenbaum, Arnold. "Who Is the Antichrist?" In The Gathering Storm: Understanding Prophecy in Critical Times, pp. 210-39. Edited by Mal Couch. Springfield, Mo.: 21st Century Press, 2005.

Gaebelein, Arno C. The Annotated Bible. 4 vols. Reprint ed. Chicago: Moody Press, and New York: Loizeaux Brothers, 1970.

Gaster, Theodor H. The Dead Sea Scriptures. Revised and enlarged edition; Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Co., Anchor Books, 1964.

Gillquist, Peter E. Love Is Now. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1970.

Glasscock, Ed. "Forgiveness and Cleansing in 1 John 1:9." Bibliotheca Sacra 166:662 (April-June 2009):217-31.

Goodman, G. The Epistle of Eternal Life. London: Pickering & Inglis, 1936.

Graystone, Kenneth. The Johannine Epistles. New Century Bible Commentary series. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., and London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1984.

A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. By C. G. Wilke. Revised by C. L. Wilibald Grimm. Translated, revised and enlarged by Joseph Henry Thayer, 1889.

Guthrie, Donald. New Testament Introduction: Hebrews to Revelation. 2nd ed. reprinted. London: Tyndale Press, 1962, 1966.

Hanna, Kenneth G. From Gospels to Glory: Exploring the New Testament. Bloomington, Ind.: CrossBooks, 2014.

Harris, W. Hall. "A Theology of John's Writings." In A Biblical Theology of the New Testament, pp. 167-242. Edited by Roy B. Zuck. Chicago: Moody Press, 1994.

Henry, Matthew. Commentary on the Whole Bible. One volume ed. Edited by Leslie F. Church. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing Co., 1961.

Hiebert, D. Edmond. "An Expositional Study of 1 John." Bibliotheca Sacra 145:578 (April-June 1988):197-210; 579 (July-September 1988):329-42; 580 (October-December 1988):420-35; 146:581 (January-March 1989):76-93; 582 (April-June 1989):198-216; 583 (July-September 1989):310-19; 584 (October-December 1989):420-36; 147:585 (January-March 1990):69-88; 586 (April-June 1990):216-30; 587 (July-September 1990):309-28.

_____. An Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 3: The Non-Pauline Epistles and Revelation. Chicago: Moody Press, 1977.

Hodges, Zane C. "1 John." In The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament, pp. 881-904. Edited by John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck. Wheaton: Scripture Press Publications, Victor Books, 1983.

_____. The Epistles of John: Walking in the Light of God's Love. Irving, Tex.: Grace Evangelical Society, 1999.

_____. "Fellowship and Confession in 1 John 1:5-10." Bibliotheca Sacra129:513 (January-March 1972):48-60.

_____. "The First Epistle of John." In The Grace New Testament Commentary, 2:1191-1229. Edited by Robert N. Wilkin. 2 vols. Denton, Tex.: Grace Evangelical Society, 2010.

_____. The Gospel Under Siege. Dallas: Redencion Viva, 1981.

_____. "Is God's Truth in You? 1 John 2:4b." Grace Evangelical Society News 5:7 (July 1990):2-3.

The Holy Bible: New International Version. Colorado Springs, et al.: International Bible Society, 1984.

The Holy Bible: New King James Version. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1982.

Houlden, J. L. A Commentary on the Johannine Epistles. Harper's New Testament Commentaries series. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.

Jamieson, Robert; A. R. Fausset; and David Brown. Commentary Practical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. Reprint ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1961.

Keller, Timothy. Counterfeit Gods: The Empty Promises of Money, Sex, and Power, and the Only Hope that Matters. New York: Penguin Random House, 2009.

Kendall, R. T. Calvin and English Calvinism to 1649. Studies in Christian History and Thought series. First ed. Milton Keyes, G.B.: Paternoster, 1997; New ed. Eugene, Oreg.: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2006.

Kennedy, George A. New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.

King, Guy H. The Fellowship. London: Marshall, Morgan & Scott, 1954.

Kistemaker, Simon J. Exposition of the Epistle of James and the Epistles of John. New Testament Commentary Series. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1986.

Koch, Kurt E. Between Christ and Satan. Translated by Yolanda N. Entz. Berghausen Bd., Germany: Evangelization Publishers, 1961.

Kruse, Colin G. The Letters of John. The Pillar New Testament Commentary series. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., and Leicester, Eng.: Apollos, 2000.

Kubo, Sakae. "1 John 3:9: Absolute or Habitual?" Andrews University Seminary Studies 7 (1969):47-56.

Ladd, George Eldon. A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1974, 1979.

Lange, John Peter, ed. Commentary on the Holy Scripture. 12 vols. Reprint ed. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1960. Vol 12: James—Revelation, by J. P. Lange, J. J. Van Oosterzee, G. T. C. Fronmuller, and Karl Braune. Enlarged and edited by E. R. Craven. Translated by J. Isidor Mombert and Evelina Moore.

Law, Robert. The Tests of Life: A Study of the First Epistle of St. John. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark, 1909.

Lenski, Richard C. H. The Interpretation of the Epistles of St. Peter, St. John and St. Jude. 1945. Reprint ed. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House, 1961.

Lloyd-Jones, Martyn. Fellowship With God: Studies in 1 John. Vol. 1 of Life in Christ series. Wheaton: Crossway Books, 1993.

Louw, J. P. "Verbal Aspect in the First Letter of John." Neotestamentica 9 (1975):98-104.

MacArthur, John F., Jr. Faith Works: The Gospel According to the Apostles. Dallas: Word Publishing, 1993.

_____. The Gospel according to Jesus. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1988.

Malatesta, E. Interiority and Covenant. A Study of einai en and menein en in the First Letter of Saint John. Anchor Bible 69. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1978.

Marshall, I. Howard. The Epistles of John. New International Commentary on the New Testament series. Reprint ed. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1984.

McGee, J. Vernon. Thru the Bible with J. Vernon McGee. 5 vols. Pasadena, Calif.: Thru The Bible Radio; and Nashville: Thomas Nelson, Inc., 1983.

McLean, John A. "An Exegetical Study of 1 John 5:18-21." Bibliotheca Sacra 169:673 (January-March 2012):68-78.

McNeile, Alan Hugh. An Introduction to the Study of the New Testament. 2nd ed. revised by C. S. C. Williams. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1927, 1953.

Nouwen, Henri J. M. Here and Now: Living in the Spirit. New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1994, 2003.

Merkle, Benjamin L. "What Is the Meaning of 'Idols' in 1 John 5:51?" Bibliotheca Sacra 169:675 (July-September 2012):328-40.

Mitchell, John G. An Everlasting Love. Portland: Multnomah Press, 1982.

_____. Fellowship: Three Letters from John. Portland: Multnomah Press, 1974.

Morgan, G. Campbell. An Exposition of the Whole Bible. Westwood, N.J.: Fleming H. Revell, 1959.

_____. Living Messages of the Books of the Bible. 2 vols. New York: Fleming H. Revell Co., 1912.

_____. The Unfolding Message of the Bible. Westwood, N.J.: Fleming H. Revell Co., 1961.

Morris, Leon. The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1965.

The Nelson Study Bible. Edited by Earl D. Radmacher. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1997.

The NET2 (New English Translation) Bible. N.c.: Biblical Press Foundation, 2019.

The New American Standard Bible. La Habra, Cal.: The Lockman Foundation, 2020.

The New Scofield Reference Bible. Edited by Frank E. Gaebelein, William Culbertson, et al. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.

Olson, C. Gordon. Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism: An Inductive Mediate Theology of Salvation. 3rd ed. Lynchburg: Global Gospel Publishers, 2012.

Pentecost, J. Dwight. The Joy of Fellowship. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1977.

Pfeiffer, Robert H. History of New Testament Times With an Introduction to the Apocrypha. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1949, 1963.

Philips, J. B. Your God Is Too Small. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1952.

Plummer, Alfred. The Epistles of S. John. Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges series. 1883. Reprint ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938.

Pond, Eugene. "1 John." In Surveying Hebrews through Revelation, pp. 85-104. 2nd ed. Edited by Paul D. Weaver. Learn the Word Bible Survey series. N.c.: Learn the Word Publishing, 2019.

Radmacher, Earl D. Salvation. Swindoll Leadership Library series. Nashville: Word Publishing, 2000.

Richardson, Alan. An Introduction to the Theology of the New Testament. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.

Roberts, J. W. The Letters of John. Living Word Commentary series. Austin, Tex.: R. B. Sweet, 1968.

Robertson, Archibald Thomas. Word Pictures in the New Testament. 6 vols. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1931.

Ross, A. The Epistles of James and John. New International Commentary series. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1954.

Ryrie, Charles Caldwell. Biblical Theology of the New Testament. Chicago: Moody Press, 1959.

_____. "The First Epistle of John." In The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, pp. 1463-78. Edited by Charles F. Pfeiffer and Everett F. Harrison. Chicago: Moody Press, 1962.

Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Johannine Epistles. Translated from the 7th ed. of Die Johannesbriefe (1984) by Reginald and Ilse Fuller. New York: Crossroad Publishing Co., 1992.

Sloyan, G. S. Walking in the Truth: Perseverers and Deserters: The First, Second, and Third Letters of John. Valley Forge, Penn.: Trinity, 1995.

Smalley, Stephen S. 1, 2, 3 John. Word Biblical Commentary series. Waco: Word Books, 1984.

Smith, David. "The Epistles of St. John." In The Expositor's Greek Testament, 5 (1910):151-208. 4th ed. Edited by W. Robertson Nicoll. 5 vols. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1900-12.

Spurgeon, Charles Haddon. 12 Sermons on the Second Coming of Christ. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1976.

_____. An All Round Ministry. Reprint ed. London and Carlisle, Pa.: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1900, 1972.

Stanton, Gerald B. Kept from the Hour. Fourth ed. Miami Springs, Fla.: Schoettle Publishing Co., 1991.

Storms, C. Samuel. Reaching God's Ear. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1988.

Stott, John R. W. Basic Introduction to the New Testament. 1st American ed. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1964.

_____. The Epistles of John. Tyndale New Testament Commentaries series. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1964.

Swindoll, Charles R. Come before Winter … and Share My Hope. Portland: Multnomah Press, 1985.

_____. The Swindoll Study Bible. Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers, 2017.

Tan, Randall K. J. "Should We Pray for Straying Brethren? John's Confidence in 1 John 5:16-17." Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 45:4 (December 2002):599-609.

Tenney, Merrill C. The New Testament: An Historical and Analytic Survey. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1953, 1957.

Thiessen, Henry Clarence. Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1943, 1962.

Tozer, A. W. The Knowledge of the Holy. New York, et al.: Harper & Row Publishers, 1961.

Westcott, Brooke Foss. The Gospel According to St. John: The Authorised Version with Introduction and Notes. 1880. London: James Clarke & Co., Ltd., 1958.

_____. The Epistles of St. John. 1883. Reprint ed. England: Marcham Manor Press, 1966.

Wiersbe, Warren W. The Bible Exposition Commentary. 2 vols. Wheaton: Scripture Press Publications, Victor Books, 1989.

Wilkin, Robert N. "'Assurance: That You May Know' (1 John 5:11-13a)." Grace Evangelical Society News 5:12 (December 1990):2, 4.

_____. "Do Born Again People Sin? 1 John 3:9." Grace Evangelical Society News 5:3 (March 1990):2-3.

_____. "Knowing God By Our Works?" Grace Evangelical Society News 3:10 (October-November 1988):3-4.

_____. Secure and Sure: Grasping the Promises of God. Irving, Tex.: Grace Evangelical Society, 2005.

Wuest, Kenneth S. Word Studies in the Greek New Testament. Reprint ed. 16 vols. in 4. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966.

Yarbrough, Robert W. 1—3 John. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament series. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.

Yarid, John R., Jr. "Reflections of the Upper Room Discourse in 1 John." Bibliotheca Sacra 160:637 (January-March 2003):65-76.

[1]E.g., Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian.

[2]See Charles C. Ryrie, "The First Epistle of John," in The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, pp. 1464-65, for a concise discussion of views of authorship; and see Henry Alford, The Greek Testament, 4:1:159-65, for a longer discussion.

[3]Robert W. Yarbrough, 1—3 John, pp. 16-21. See also Alford, 4:1:169.

[4]Colin G. Kruse, The Letters of John, pp. 4, 8, 15.

[5]Gnostics believed that the world was created and ruled by a lesser divinity, the demiurge, and that Christ was an emissary of the remote supreme divine being, esoteric knowledge (Gr. gnosis) of whom enabled the redemption of the human spirit. Docetists believed that Christ's body was not human but either a phantasm or of real but celestial substance, and that therefore his sufferings were only apparent.

[6]Rudolf Schnachenburg, The Johannine Epistles, p. 23.

[7]Stephen S. Smalley, 1, 2, 3 John, p. xxiv.  Paragraph division omitted.

[8]See Zane C. Hodges, "1 John," in The Bible Knowledge Commentary: New Testament, p. 882; idem, The First Epistle of John," in The Grace New Testament Commentary, 2:1192.

[9]E.g., B. F. Westcott, The Epistles of St. John, pp. xxx-xxxii; F. F. Bruce, The Epistles of John, p. 31; and Yarbrough, p. 17.

[10]Cf. Smalley, pp. xxii, xxxii; Donald A. Carson and Douglas J. Moo, An Introduction to the New Testament, pp. 676-77; and G. G. Findlay, Fellowship in the Life Eternal, p. 49.

[11]David Smith, "The Epistles of St. John," in The Expositor's Greek Testament, 5:154.

[12]See also Donald Guthrie, New Testament Introduction, 3:205-6.

[13]See D. Edmond Hiebert, An Introduction to the New Testament, 3:191-97.

[14]A. T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament, 6:200. Cf. Findlay, pp. 59, 69.

[15]J. Sidlow Baxter, Explore the Book, 6:321.

[16]Ibid., 6:324.

[17]Adolf Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, p. 401.

[18]Kruse, p. 31.

[19]See Zane C. Hodges, The Epistles of John, pp. 31-33, who followed George A. Kennedy, New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism.

[20]A chiasmus is a rhetorical or literary figure in which words, grammatical constructions, or concepts are repeated in reverse order, in the same or a modified form.

[21]Ron J. Bigalke, "Identity of the First Epistle of John: Context, Style, and Structure," Journal of Dispensational Theology 17:50 (Spring 2013):43.

[22]Baxter, 6:329.

[23]See the tables of corresponding expressions in John's Gospel and his First Epistle in B. F. Westcott, The Gospel According to St. John: The Authorised [sic] Version with Introduction and Notes, pp. lxi-lxiii.

[24]Quotations from the English Bible in these notes are from the New American Standard Bible (NASB), 2020 edition, unless otherwise indicated.

[25]Adapted from G. Campbell Morgan, Living Messages of the Books of the Bible, 2:2:177-93.

[26]I. Howard Marshall, The Epistles of John, p. 99. Cf. Carson and Moo, p. 669.

[27]William Barclay, The Letters of John and Jude, p. 17.

[28]Kruse, p. 53.

[29]Schnachenburg, p. 57.

[30]Findlay, p. 86.

[31]J. Vernon McGee, "The First Epistle of John," in Thru the Bible with J. Vernon McGee, 5:757.

[32]Bruce, pp. 16-17.

[33]Ryrie, p. 1464. Cf. Robertson, 6:200.

[34]Findlay, p. 70.

[35]D. Edmond Hiebert, "An Expositional Study of 1 John," Bibliotheca Sacra 145:578 (April-June 1988):203.

[36]Westcott, The Epistles …, pp. 6-7; C. H. Dodd, The Johanine Epistles, pp. 3-6; J. L. Houlden, A Commentary on the Johanine Epistles, pp. 50- 52; Findlay, p. 83.

[37]G. Goodman.

[38]Smalley, p. 10.

[39]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 4.

[40]Glenn W. Barker, "1 John," in Hebrews-Revelation, vol. 12 of The Expositor's Bible Commentary, p. 307.

[41]John G. Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 14. Cf. Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset, and David Brown, Commentary Practical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, p. 1495; G. Campbell Morgan, The Unfolding Message of the Bible, p. 363-64; idem, An Exposition of the Whole Bible, p. 527; Kenneth S. Wuest, Word Studies in the Greek New Testament, 4:1:59-60;  Hodges, The Epistles …, pp. 34, 50; idem, "The First …," 2:1192, 1194; Ryrie, p. 1466; Schnachenburg, pp. 63-64; Kenneth G. Hanna, From Gospel to Glory, p. 451; Eugene Pond, "1 John," in Surveying Hebrews through Revelation, p. 88.

[42]Schnachenburg, pp. 63-64.

[43]D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Fellowship With God: Studies in 1 John, p. 77. Cf. Findlay, p. 134.

[44]Alfred Plummer, The Epistles of S. John, p. 20.

[45]Hodges, "1 John," p. 883. See 3:24.

[46]Yarbrough, p. 29.

[47]Findlay, p. 91.

[48]Marshall, p. 107-8.

[49]Ibid., p. 105.

[50]Yarbrough, p. 46. See also Smalley, p. 15; and Gary W. Derickson, "What Is the Message of 1 John?" Bibliotheca Sacra 150:597 (January-March 1993):89-105.

[51]Mitchell, p. 21. Cf. Hodges, "1 John," pp. 883-84.

[52]Idem, The Epistles …, p. 57.

[53]An antinomian believes that Christians are released by grace from the obligation of observing the moral law.

[54]Richard C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of the Epistles of St. Peter, St. John and St. Jude, p. 382.

[55]Barker, p. 309.

[56]Baxter, 6:323.

[57]Schnachenburg, p. 71.

[58]Yarbrough, p. 46.

[59]Findlay, p. 97.

[60]Lenski, p. 384.

[61]Dodd, pp. 18-19; John R. W. Stott, The Epistles of John, p. 70; Theodor H. Gaster, The Dead Sea Scriptures, pp. 46, 49-51; Schnachenburg, p. 73.

[62]Hiebert, "An Expositional …," 145:331.

[63]Barker, p. 310. See Westcott, The Epistles …, pp. 16-17 for a good discussion of God being "light."

[64]Jamieson, et al., p. 1497.

[65]Marshall, p. 110. Cf. Barker, p. 310.

[66]Smith, 5:171.

[67]Yarbrough, p. 59.

[68]E.g., Lloyd-Jones, pp. 130, 142.

[69]Charles P. Baylis, "The Meaning of Walking 'in the Darkness' (1 John 1:6)," Bibliotheca Sacra 149:594 (April-June 1992):214-22.

[70]Zane C. Hodges, "Fellowship and Confession in 1 John 1:5-10," Bibliotheca Sacra 129:513 (January-March 1972):52.

[71]Idem, The Epistles …, pp. 60-61. Paragraph division omitted.

[72]Lewis S. Chafer, Systematic Theology, 3:101.

[73]Barker, p. 310; Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 20.

[74]Smalley, p. 24.

[75]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 21.

[76]Ryrie, p. 1467. A metonymy is a figure of speech in which a writer uses the name of one thing for that of another associated with it or suggested by it.

[77]Bruce, p. 44.

[78]McGee, 5:762.

[79]Perfectionism is the belief that the Christian does not sin after he or she has been born again.

[80]E.g., Smalley, p. 29.

[81]Robert Law, The Tests of Life: A Study of the First Epistle of St. John, p. 130; Robertson, 6:208.

[82]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 23

[83]A. Ross, The Epistles of James and John, p. 146.

[84]E.g., Peter E. Gillquist, Love Is Now, p. 64.

[85]The New Scofield Reference Bible, p. 1342.

[86]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 67. For further discussion of this verse see Ed Glasscock, "Forgiveness and Cleansing in 1 John 1:9," Bibliotheca Sacra 166:662 (April-June 2009):217-31.

[87]Robertson, 6:208.

[88]Mitchell, p. 42. Italics omitted.

[89]See James Allman, "First John 1:9: Confession as a Test, but of What?" Bibliotheca Sacra 172:686 (April-June 2015):203-21.

[90]Hodges, "Fellowship and …," p. 48.

[91]Ibid., p. 60. Cf. Warren W. Wiersbe, The Bible Exposition Commentary, p. 482.

[92]Matthew Henry, Commentary on the Whole Bible, p. 1956.

[93]Smith, 5:173.

[94]Yarbrough, p. 70.

[95]McGee, 5:765.

[96]See John R. Yarid Jr., "Reflections of the Upper Room Discourse in 1 John," Bibliotheca Sacra 160:637 (January-March 2003):65-76.

[97]Lenski, p. 398.

[98]McGee, 5:766.

[99]Smalley, pp. 35-36.

[100]Smith, 5:173.

[101]See Leon Morris, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, pp. 125-85; W. Hall Harris, "A Theology of John's Writings," in A Biblical Theology of the New Testament, p. 215; Yarbrough, pp. 77-81; and James E. Allman, "hilaskesthai: To Propitiate or to Expiate?" Bibliotheca Sacra 172:687 (July-September 2015):335-55.

[102]See Kruse, p. 74.

[103]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 71. See also Yarbrough, p. 80.

[104]See R. T. Kendall, Calvinism and English Calvinism to 1649.

[105]Smalley, p. 42.

[106]Law, p. 209.

[107]Barker, p. 315.


[109]J. Allen Blair, The Epistles of John, p. 59. Paragraph division omitted.

[110]Barclay, p. 64.

[111]Hodges, The Epistles …, pp. 75-76. Paragraph division omitted.

[112]Ibid., p. 77. See also idem, "The First …," 2:1198.

[113]Marshall, p. 122.

[114]Smalley, p. 45.

[115]See Zane C. Hodges, "Is God's Truth in You? 1 John 2:4b," Grace Evangelical Society News 5:7 (July 1990):2-3.

[116]Mitchell, p. 84.

[117]Yarbrough, p. 85.

[118]Robert N. Wilkin, "Knowing God By Our Works?" Grace Evangelical Society News 3:10 (October-November 1988):3.

[119]Alford, 4:2:434.

[120]Smalley, p. 59.

[121]Bruce, p. 51; Stott, p. 91; Dodd, p. 31; Kruse, p. 80.

[122]Alford, 4:2:435.

[123]Hodges, "The First …," 2:1198.

[124]Smalley, p. 52.

[125]Stott, p. 92.

[126]Mitchell, p. 60.

[127]Yarbrough, p. 90.

[128]See Hodges, "The First …," 2:1199.

[129]Ryrie, p. 1468.

[130]Hiebert, "An Expositional …," 145:422.

[131]Barker, p. 317; Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 86.

[132]Ibid., p. 87.

[133]Hyperbole is exaggeration to make a point but not meant to be taken literally.

[134]Smalley, p. 62.

[135]Jamieson, et al., p. 1500.

[136]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 56.

[137]Yarbrough, p. 105.

[138]Smith, 5:176.

[139]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 93.

[140]Idem, The First …, 2:1200.

[141]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 57.

[142]Bruce, p. 58; McGee, 5:772.

[143]Smalley, pp. 69-70. Cf. Barker, p. 319;  ll, p. 64; Yarbrough, p. 114-21; Findlay, p. 178-91; Kruse, p. 93.

[144]Marshall, p. 138; Dodd, pp. 37-39; Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 59; James M. Boice, The Epistles of John, pp. 72-73; Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 94.

[145]Smalley, p. 71; Marshall, pp. 136-37; Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 95.

[146]Mitchell, p. 66.

[147]Hodges, "The First …," 2:1201.

[148]Bruce, p. 59.

[149]See Smalley, p. 75; Jamieson, et al., p. 1500; and E. Malatesta, Interiority and Covenant. A Study of einai en and menein en in the First Letter of Saint John, pp. 168-69.

[150]See, for example, Raymond Brown, The Epistles of John; John Calvin, The First Epistle of John; D. Edmond Hiebert, The Non-Pauline Epistles and Revelation; idem, "An Expositional Study of 1 John," Bibliotheca Sacra (April 1988-July 1990); Law; John F. MacArthur Jr., The Gospel according to Jesus; Marshall; Stott; Westcott; Dodd; Boice; Bruce; Barker; and Wiersbe.

[151]Zane C. Hodges, The Gospel Under Siege, pp. 47-48. Paragraph division omitted. Other commentators who hold that 1 John offers tests of fellowship rather than tests of life are J. Dwight Pentecost, The Joy of Fellowship; Mitchell; idem, An Everlasting Love; Joseph C. Dillow, The Reign of the Servant Kings, pp. 156-75; Guy H. King, The Fellowship; Charles C. Ryrie, Biblical Theology of the New Testament; idem, "The First …," p. 1466; J. W. Roberts, The Letters of John; and Karl Braune, The Epistles General of John, in Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, 12:15.

[152]Findlay, p. 195.

[153]Schnachenburg, p. 119.

[154]Smalley, p. 89.

[155]Findlay, p. 197.

[156]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1469. See also Schnachenburg's excursus on "the world" in verses 15-17, pp. 125-28.

[157]Smalley, p. 87.

[158]Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 69.

[159]Yarbrough, pp. 128-37.

[160]Robertson, 6:214; Schnachenburg, p. 120.

[161]Kenneth Grayston, The Johannine Epistles, p. 75.

[162]Henry, p. 1957.

[163]Hodges, "The First …," 2:1202.

[164]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 62.

[165]Schnachenburg, p. 122.

[166]Barker, p. 322.

[167]Findlay, p. 207. Cf. Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1470.

[168]Jamieson, et al., p. 1501.

[169]Schnachenburg, p. 123.

[170]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 49. Cf. Eph. 4:1; Col. 3:12-13.

[171]The Nelson Study Bible, p. 2148.


[173]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 105.

[174]Findlay, p. 215.

[175]See Kruse, pp. 99-100, for a chart of the major New Testament antichrist passages.

[176]Stott, pp. 104-5; Plummer, p. 107; Barclay, p. 73.

[177]Cf. McGee, 5:776.

[178]Robertson, 6:215.

[179]Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 71. Cf. Findlay, p. 218.

[180]Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 72.

[181]Smalley, p. 101.

[182]Ibid., p. 103. Cf. Hodges, The Epistles …, pp. 109-10.

[183]Wiersbe, p. 499.

[184]Marshall, p. 152.

[185]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1470.

[186]This is a view proposed by Dodd, p. 63, but refuted by Hodges, "1 John," p. 892, and Simon Kistemaker, Exposition of the Epistle of James and the Epistles of John, p. 279, footnote 55. Marshall, p. 155, proposed a similar view, namely, that the Word applied by the Spirit constitutes the anointing, which Smalley, pp. 106-7, followed. Yarbrough, p. 149, viewed the anointing as the effect of the apostolic message that the readers had received (i.e., the truth).

[187]For summaries of Gnostic teaching, see Dillow, pp. 158-61; and Barclay, pp. 8-15.

[188]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1471.

[189]See Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius Pamphilus, 3:28:113-14; Barker, p. 295; and Brown, p. 112.

[190]Smalley, pp. 110-11. Cf. Stott, p. 111. See Arnold Fruchtenbaum, "Who Is the Antichrist?" in The Gathering Storm, pp. 210-39.

[191]Barker, p. 326.

[192]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 55.

[193]Barker, p. 327.

[194]The Nelson …, p. 2143.

[195]Allman, p. 220.

[196]Yarbrough, pp. 166-67.

[197]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 123. Paragraph division omitted.

[198]An inclusio is a literary device based on a concentric principle, also known as bracketing, bookending, or an envelope structure, which consists of creating a frame by placing similar material at the beginning and end of a section.

[199]Findlay, p. 231.

[200]Alford, 4:2:457.

[201]See Gerald B. Stanton, Kept from the Hour, ch. 6: "The Imminency of the Coming of Christ for the Church," pp. 108-37; Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 81. See also A. E. Brooke, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Johannine Epistles, p. 65; C. H. Spurgeon, 12 Sermons on the Second Coming of Christ, p. 134; Findlay, pp. 232-33; and Robert S. Candlish, The First Epistle of John, p. 213.

[202]McGee, 5:785.

[203]C. H. Spurgeon, An All Round Ministry, p. 278.

[204]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 125.

[205]Arno C. Gaebelein, The Annotated Bible, 4:2:146-47.

[206]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 127.

[207]The Nelson …, p. 2144.

[208]See Lenski, p. 447.

[209]See Yarbrough, pp. 174-75 for a graph and a table of the occurrences of "love" in all the New Testament books.

[210]See Henri J. M. Nouwen, Here and Now, chapter 11: "Who We Are," pp. 188-200.

[211]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 96.

[212]Barker, p. 330.

[213]Marshall, p. 171.

[214]Smith, 5:183.

[215]Blair, p. 92.

[216]Lenski, p. 452.

[217]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 97.

[218]See Wayne A. Brindle, "Biblical Evidence for the Imminence of the Rapture," Bibliotheca Sacra 158:630 (April-June 2001):149-50.

[219]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1472.

[220]Marshall, p. 175.

[221]Smalley, p. 152.

[222]J. N. Darby, Synopsis of the Books of the Bible, 5:511.

[223]Smalley, p. 158.

[224]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 103.

[225]E.g., Lenski, p. 429.

[226]Smalley, pp. 158-59. Cf. John 15:5.

[227]Jamieson, et al., p. 1504.

[228]Schnachenburg, p. 172.

[229]E.g., Lenski, p. 458.

[230]Hodges, The Gospel …, pp. 58-59.

[231]Marshall, p. 180.

[232]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 59. See also Smalley, pp. 159-60; Yarbrough, p. 183; Kruse, p. 131.

[233]J. P. Louw, "Verbal Aspect in the First Letter of John," Neotestamentica 9 (1975):101.

[234]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 136.

[235]Marshall, p. 187.

[236]Smalley, pp. 161-62, 164, 172.

[237]Ibid., p. 168.

[238]Jamieson, et al., p. 1504.

[239]See also Marshall, p. 180; Dodd, p. 79.

[240]See Robert N. Wilkin, "Do Born Again People Sin? 1 John 3:9," Grace Evangelical Society News 5:3 (March 1990):2-3.

[241]Footnote 16: Sakae Kubo, "1 John 3:9: Absolute or Habitual?" Andrews University Seminary Studies 7 (1969):47-56.

[242]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 144.

[243]Ibid., p. 141.


[245]McGee, 5:792. See also Gaebelein, 4:2:149.

[246]Smith, 5:185. See also Jamieson, et al., p. 1505.

[247]Findlay, p. 266; Schnachenburg, p. 175.

[248]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 60.

[249]Ibid., p. 61.

[250]Findlay, p. 267. Cf. Schnachenburg, p. 175.

[251]See Harris, p. 221.

[252]Dillow, p. 168.

[253]Ibid., p. 169.

[254]Ibid., p. 172.

[255]Earl D. Radmacher, Salvation, p. 109. Italics omitted.

[256]Gleason L. Archer, An Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties, p. 429.

[257]Smalley, p. 171.

[258]Findlay, pp. 254-67.

[259]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 62.

[260]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 109.

[261]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 152. NIV refers to The Holy Bible: New International Version.

[262]McGee, 5:794.

[263]Dodd, p. 82.

[264]Yarbrough, p. 197.

[265]Hiebert, "An Expositional …," 146:302.

[266]Barker, p. 335.

[267]Marshall, p. 192.

[268]Smith, 5:186.

[269]Marshall, p. 192.

[270]Mitchell, Fellowship, pp. 128 and 136.

[271]Smalley, p. 199.

[272]See James E. Allman, "Suffering in the Non-Pauline Epistles," in Why, O God? Suffering and Disability in the Bible and Church, pp. 195, 198-200.

[273]Jamieson, et al., p. 1506.

[274]Schnachenburg, p. 185.

[275]Marshall, p. 199.

[276]Smalley, p. 205.

[277]Ibid., p. 206.

[278]Robertson, 6:228.

[279]Barclay, p. 104.

[280]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 169.

[281]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1474.

[282]Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 113.

[283]Robertson, 6:229.

[284]See Kurt E. Koch, Between Christ and Satan, pp. 183-99.

[285]Alford, 4:2:484.

[286]Yarbrough, p. 192.

[287]J. B. Philips, Your God Is Too Small, p. 90.

[288]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 140.

[289]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 176.

[290]Smalley, p. 216.

[291]McGee, 5:803.

[292]Barclay, p. 113.

[293]Barker, p. 341.

[294]Marshall, p. 209, footnote 18.

[295]Blair, p. 126.

[296]Alford, 4:2:487.

[297]Barker, p. 341.

[298]Marshall, p. 210.

[299]Alford, 4:2:487.

[300]Findlay, p. 327.

[301]Smalley, p. 235.

[302]Yarbrough, p. 234.

[303]Bruce, p. 107.

[304]Blair, pp. 132-33. Paragraph division omitted.

[305]Findlay, p. 331.

[306]Dodd, p. 110.

[307]Marshall, p. 212.

[308]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1475. Bold emphasis omitted.

[309]Robertson, 6:232. See also A. W. Tozer, The Knowledge of the Holy, pp. 104-9.

[310]For a good explanation of why a loving God allows people to go to hell, see Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 184.

[311]Ibid., p. 187.

[312]See Baker's Dictionary of Theology, s.v. "Theophany," by Wick Broomall, pp. 520-21.

[313]Stott, p. 164. Cf. Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 152.

[314]Bruce, p. 109.

[315]Alford, 4:2:492.

[316]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 192.

[317]Idem, The First …, 2:1218.

[318]Yarbrough, p. 252.

[319]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 197.

[320]Smalley, p. 256.

[321]Wiersbe, p. 520.

[322]Ibid., p. 521.

[323]Smith, 5:192.

[324]Alford, 4:2:495.

[325]Schnachenburg, p. 224.

[326]Smalley, p. 261. Cf. Dodd, pp. 122-23.

[327]G. S. Sloyan, Walking in the Truth, p. 49.

[328]The Nelson …, p. 2144.

[329]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 209.


[331]Henry, p. 1961.

[332]Baxter, 6:328.

[333]Bruce, p. 115.

[334]Marshall, p. 226.

[335]See Charles W. Colson, Loving God, p. 40.

[336]Robertson, 6:238.

[337]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 216.

[338]See Alford, 4:2:501-2; Smith, 5:195; Jamieson, et al., p. 1509; Morgan, An Exposition …, p. 529; Lenski, p. 526; Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1476; Blair, p. 174.

[339]Schnachenburg, p. 233.

[340]The Nelson …, p. 2147.

[341]McGee, 5:816.

[342]Mitchell, Fellowship, pp. 144-45.

[343]Kruse, p. 178.

[344]John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, 4:14:22.

[345]See Barclay, p. 10.

[346]Marshall, p. 278.

[347]See Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 219, footnote 10.

[348]Calvin, Institutes of …, 4:14:22. Cf. Findlay, pp. 382-88.

[349]Hodges, "The First …," 2:1224.

[350]Ryrie, "The First …," p. 1477. Cf. Alford, 4:2:504.

[351]Barker, p. 352.

[352]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 224.

[353]Smalley, p. 287.

[354]Blair, p. 175. Paragraph division omitted.

[355]See Robert N. Wilkin, "'Assurance: That You May Know' (1 John 5:11-13a)," Grace Evangelical Society News 5:12 (December 1990):2, 4.

[356]Westcott, The Epistles …, p. 188.

[357]Hodges, The Gospel …, p. 51. Cf. Wilkin, "Knowing God …," p. 3.

[358]See Radmacher, pp. 203-18; Robert N. Wilkin, Secure and Sure; Michael Eaton, No Condemnation; C. Gordon Olson, Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism, pp. 175-87.

[359]E.g., Calvin, Institutes of …, 3:24:4; and John MacArthur, Faith Works, pp. 162-66.

[360]Ibid., p. 171. The emphasis is his.

[361]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 229.

[362]Findlay, p. 398. See Kruse, pp. 198-200, for "A Note on the Bases of Assurance" in 1 John.

[363]Smalley, p. 295. Cf. Law, p. 301.

[364]Barclay, p. 136.

[365]See Thomas L. Constable, "What Prayer Will and Will Not Change," in Essays in Honor of J. Dwight Pentecost, pp. 99-113; and idem, Talking to God: What the Bible Teaches about Prayer, p. 170.

[366]Darby, 5:537.

[367]Lenski, pp. 532-33.

[368]Jamieson, et al., p. 1510.

[369]Marshall, p. 244.

[370]Alford, 4:2:509.

[371]Randall K. J. Tan, "Should We Pray for Straying Brethren? John's Confidence in 1 John 5:16-17," Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 45:4 (December 2002):599-609; and Yarbrough, pp. 306-13.

[372]Lenski, p. 535.

[373]Schnachenburg, p. 249.

[374]E.g., Findlay, p. 406.

[375]Smith, 5:198.

[376]Marshall, p. 249. See also Westcott, The Epistles …, pp. 209-14.

[377]Robertson, 6:244.

[378]See W. Robert Cook, "Hamartiological Problems in First John," Bibliotheca Sacra 123; 491 (July-September 1966):257-59; and C. Samuel Storms, Reaching God's Ear, pp. 241-53.

[379]Blair, p. 190.

[380]Smalley, p. 299. An apostate is a person who has departed from a position or truth that he or she formerly held. Apostates can be believers or unbelievers.

[381]Footnote 27: Stott, pp. 186-91.

[382]Marshall, pp. 249-50.

[383]McGee, 5:820.

[384]Barclay, p. 143.

[385]Hodges, The Epistles …, p. 241.

[386]See John A. McLean, "An Exegetical Study of 1 John 5:18-21," Bibliotheca Sacra 169:673 (January-March 2012):68-78.

[387]See my previous discussion of 3:9.

[388]Mitchell, Fellowship, p. 163.

[389]See Marshall, p. 252, footnote 37, for further discussion of the options.

[390]Darby, 5:510.

[391]Harris, p. 232.

[392]Findlay, p. 415.

[393]Timothy Keller, Counterfeit Gods, p. xix.

[394]Barker, p. 357. Cf. Lenski, p. 545; Benjamin L. Merkle, "What Is the Meaning of 'Idols' in 1 John 5:51?" Bibliotheca Sacra 169:675 (July-September 2012):328-40.

[395]Findlay, p. 425. See also Charles R. Swindoll, Come before Winter, "Idols," pp. 80-82.